你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

简单但有效的注释,在一些不太安全的c++代码之前

// yikes

其他回答

<!-- THIS IS THE MAIN CONFIGURATION FILE FOR THE ENTIRE BLOODY DIRECTORY    -->
<!--    WHATEVER YOU DO, DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE WITHOUT TALKING TO ME FIRST  -->
<!--                                I'M SERIOUS                             -->
<!-- (scroll down) -->

这一点对其他人来说很有趣,但对我来说就不那么有趣了。我从一个开发人员那里继承了代码(ASP),而他自己也继承了它。第一个程序员编写了一些很难理解的代码。第二个开发者添加了如下评论(为了保护不那么无辜的人,名字被隐藏了):

'This code was written by **************.
'I haven't a clue what it does. He hasn't a clue what it does.
'Nobody else has a clue what it does or how it does it.
'It is something to do with data but **** knows what.
'The ******* still works so please do not change this code,
'even though it is a complete pile of ****.

那我为什么不觉得有趣呢?嗯,这是一个客户内部网的ASP代码。

...正是那位顾客向我强调了这条评论。

:-(

我只是在我自己的代码中遇到了这个问题。它在一个用于类别选择的洋红色管理模板中:

        /*
         * OK; before you read the following code know what I am trying to do.
         * I needed to get the list of child catagories from the root node so that
         * the root node didn't appear in the selection box. But for some stupid
         * fucking reason the stupid fucking DBA wont let me access the items using
         * indicies and I instead have to use their stupid fucking Iterator
         * implementation. So there.
         */
        $firstList = $this->getRootNode()->getChildren();
        foreach ($firstList as $node)
        {
            $nodes = $node->getChildren();
            break;          // wtf?
        }

我要把语言从我们的旗舰产品中移除;但我记得我非常沮丧。如果我没有留下评论,我会试着修改它,但会遇到和以前一样的问题。

我没有亲身经历过这种情况,但这是一个很好的故事(详见我的评论中的解释):

#define MSGTAG_B33R     0x723 /* RIPLVB */

不是一个评论,而是一个goto标签

ICantBelieveImUsingAGoto: