你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

在游戏中,这个物体可以被踩到,或者:

stepOff(); //bitch

其他回答

Control + A,重写

这是在以前的项目中作为签入注释添加到源代码控制中的注释。

/*

 ____________________
/                    \
| Jean-Michel Bechet |
| 2002-2009          |
\___  _______________/
    |/
 (o_
 //\
 V_/_


*/
//Dave chapelle reports errors.
function reporterror() {
  davechapelle.trace("FUCK!");
}

我曾经在一个用Paradox 3.5 -编写的大型预算系统工作多年后接到一个客户的电话

“我们在调试中遇到了一些注释”-

// This shouldn't happen, if it does, then the bits that automagically 
// worked when I wrote it have stopped working

... !

I was doing a database in Access, very simple thing - at least it was supposed to be at the start or I would have done it in Delphi. The client wanted to be able to get the customer info out of the database but they would not enter enough information to reliably identify the customer. I told them to use the phone number as the key as each customer (the way they worked, not for everyone) would have a different number. After a few frantic calls from them, (It's not working we can't enter the customer) I discovered that they were too lazy to look up the phone numbers from their old system and were trying to enter all the numbers they did not know as "n/a". In trying to sort this out for them I ended up with a lot of checking loops in the code and had the comment beside one outcome "This should never be reached if they do what they are supposed to do!!!!!!!!!"

他们还曾经问过我:“即使我们输入了错误的地址,我们如何才能找到正确的客户?”而这一切都是为了花生。