从Python / ceval.c:

/* This is gonna seem *real weird*, but if you put some other code between
   PyEval_EvalFrame() and PyEval_EvalCodeEx() you will need to adjust
   the test in the if statements in Misc/gdbinit (pystack and pystackv). */

// error codes
#define ERROR_SUCESS 0
#define ERROR_SUCCESS_IS_MISSPELLED 1

没有定义其他错误代码。

我猜它被病毒式传播了，我在一个守护进程(Linux)中发现了以下防止OOM杀手选择它:

/*
 * Don't OOM me, bro!
 */

这紧跟在mlockall()之后，以防止进程交换，注释如下:

/*
 * Don't swap me, bro!
 */

-- Comment this later

这是一个4000多行的PL/SQL过程的第2行。唯一的评论。手术已经进行了4年了，后来还是没来…

对于我编写的memcache包装器/处理程序接口模式类，我实现了以下方法。

/**
*  Do not use, ever - left in place for testing purposes
*/
function  I_David_WillHuntYouDownAndHurtYou_Badly_IfIFindThisUsedAnyWhereInTheAppLibrary(){
...
}

这基本上是一个超级核函数，它告诉所有单独的memcache服务完全刷新自己，并从我用于键的单个名称空间计数器(例如{_counter_key value}_)重新开始。{_counter_key value})

Another minor novella I wrote was for an automated downloader for a data vendor, detailing how much I hated this vendor and went to great lengths of postulating that their infrastructure's batch system was run by a gerbil, running on a wheel and after so many revolutions of the wheel the next queued task would be started. It was written over the course of 6 months of adding additional exception handling, estoric checks like ( if we got 768 Bytes of \s characters, that means the query to their DB timed out and the spaces are the result of empty failure print statements.

//I am not sure why this works but it fixes the problem. 

这是之前的一组代码，技术上确实解决了问题，它的意思是，但打破了其他3个东西....