// if the resultMap size is less than or equal to zero
// then the product is added
if (resultMap.size() <= 0)

我曾经在一个项目中发现了这样的评论:

// Cabbage fart?

我不知道那是什么意思。还好我的魔方不在写它的人旁边。

几年前，我在一个没有单元测试可言的大型代码库中工作。

代码中隐藏了一个执行一些日历计算的方法。它有点坏了，由于一些不幸的情况，不得不以一种非常笨拙的方式处理夏令时。

我们不得不修了几次，每一次，我们都会在几个月后发现一些东西坏了。

在花了一整天的时间修复和分析之后，我把代码放到了源代码控制中，并附上了这样的评论:

// this code was written after a version trying to do {this} failed because of {reason},
// previously we were doing {this} which failed because of {reason}. This is 
// now written {this} way so that {lots of reasons here}. If you want to touch
// this code, please make sure that it produces the right answers when tested with:
//
// {some sort of unit test}

最终，我的团队被外包了。有时我想知道这段代码发生了什么:)

在某些汇编程序中，在包含&h723的行末尾

' RIP LVB

(明白吗?)

不是代码注释，而是SVN在同一个文件上提交注释:

第一次提交(在测试人员返回结果后，再进行数十次提交):

Squashed some IPR mod bugs. The were big and juicy ones, too.

2日提交:

Squashed some more mod bugs. Those are some nasty bugs, them mod bugs...

3rd:

Squashed some more mod bugs. They are like cockroaches: they'll live through a nuclear war.

4th:

Squashed some more John bugs. They too are like cockroaches: they appear anywhere John goes. Wait. That doesn't sound right.

5:

Same John bug. It didn't die, just played 'possum.

是的，我厌倦了"修复bug"

来自c#中的单元测试类:

#region quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

[Fact]
public void TestPositive()
{
    Assert.Equal(4, 2 + 2);
}

[Fact]
public void TestNegative()
{
    Assert.Equal(5, 2 + 2);
}

#endregion