我看到有人对代码的评论:

// This comment is self explanatory.

我猜他是想说“可变的”，但这个错误造成了一个有趣的评论……想想这里的循环逻辑，以及写它的徒劳。

// drunk, fix later

真希望我是在开玩笑。根据编写代码的开发人员的了解，我认为他是认真的。

aComment = 'this is not aComment' # this is aComment
class T(object):
    def f(this):
        this is not aComment

$dnstime = time() + 60 * 60 * 24 * 7 * 2; //how long are you staying for vacation on mars? twooo weeeeeks. give dees people air

在几年前编写Perl时，我在顶部和底部添加了这些注释:

# <magic type="voodoo">

...

# </magic>

下一个研究它的人在Perl中并不是那么热门，他花了一段时间搜索文档，看看“魔法”和“巫毒”是怎么做的。从那以后，我试着添加更多有用的评论……

用VB写的很好。我今天早上跑进了NET，得到了一个笑声…

''' <summary>
''' Represents an exception that was logged.  Since System.Exception implements IDictionary, it can't be
''' serialized, so I had to write this.  Pretty fucking stupid thing to have to do, System.Exception should
''' be serializable right out of the box, IMHO.
''' </summary>
''' <remarks></remarks>
Public Class LogException