你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

我所见过的最好的评论是

/* 
  There is no accounting for pointers 
*/

其他回答

# dont question, i just felt like throwing some globals in
# this is actually quite pointless as youll soon see

稍后在代码中

#draw the circles (complicated)...dont question

更晚…

# complicated process of drawing the circles in a
# somewhat symmetrical, 3-d pattern
# dont question again

甚至以后……

# will determine if user clicks on die
# i determined these values...dont worry about them

在linux 1.0内核调度器(schedule .c)中:

Dijkstra可能讨厌我。

/*
 *  'schedule()' is the scheduler function. It's a very simple and nice
 * scheduler: it's not perfect, but certainly works for most things.
 * The one thing you might take a look at is the signal-handler code here.
 *
 *   NOTE!!  Task 0 is the 'idle' task, which gets called when no other
 * tasks can run. It can not be killed, and it cannot sleep. The 'state'
 * information in task[0] is never used.
 *
 * The "confuse_gcc" goto is used only to get better assembly code..
 * Dijkstra probably hates me.
 */
asmlinkage void schedule(void)

(…)

# absolutely foul heuristic code.
# ..it's dirty, but you want it.

and:

# VERY USEFUL DEBUGGING AID, for when the above all goes pearshaped:
// Added because boss changed his mind : 20020111,20020501,20020820, ...
// Commented out because boss changed his mind : 20020201,20020614,20020908, ...

在ETL脚本之间的主要黑客RPG数据库和SQL Server一个。我大概有10到20次这样的评论……

int Q13Factor = 8125; // 2^13 for Q13