你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

在js代码中:

// hack for ie browser (assuming that ie is a browser)

其他回答

// (c) 2000 Applied Magic, Inc.
// Unauthorized use punishable by torture, mutilation, and vivisection.

啊,我一直很喜欢这个……

   // Some wanker in ISO got rid of ifstream(int), ofstream(int), and
   // fstream(int).  Twit.

这一点对其他人来说很有趣,但对我来说就不那么有趣了。我从一个开发人员那里继承了代码(ASP),而他自己也继承了它。第一个程序员编写了一些很难理解的代码。第二个开发者添加了如下评论(为了保护不那么无辜的人,名字被隐藏了):

'This code was written by **************.
'I haven't a clue what it does. He hasn't a clue what it does.
'Nobody else has a clue what it does or how it does it.
'It is something to do with data but **** knows what.
'The ******* still works so please do not change this code,
'even though it is a complete pile of ****.

那我为什么不觉得有趣呢?嗯,这是一个客户内部网的ASP代码。

...正是那位顾客向我强调了这条评论。

:-(

// This condition can't happen. Call the police or something.

在OLTP数据库事务的主要触发代码中找到:

-- This line negates the @inverseqty, which is the
-- negative of the @insertedquantity.  This works through the
-- magic of the trigger.  In fact, this code is a lot like
-- the bermuda triangle!
@negquantity = -1 * @inverseqty