你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?


当前回答

int Q13Factor = 8125; // 2^13 for Q13 

其他回答

一个可怕的解码补丁(意大利语翻译):

/**
*@return the value 
*@param key: the id of the list of instruments
*@PS this function is a violation of all the laws of the 
*software engineering, 
*commons sense, highway code 
*and ONU decision about the coding.
That sh*t...
*/
/////////////////////////////////////// this is a well commented line
// Oh crap, i think i'm gonna yack

随后不久又有:

// TODO: end this lunacy

我在COBOL程序中看到的一些东西让我感到恐惧

* All comments pertain to the lines which follow.

这是什么意思?

有人对评论感到不舒服,以至于不得不写一个元评论? 有人习惯将注释放在相关代码的下面,而被告知要将注释放在上面?这是怎么发生的?

这一点对其他人来说很有趣,但对我来说就不那么有趣了。我从一个开发人员那里继承了代码(ASP),而他自己也继承了它。第一个程序员编写了一些很难理解的代码。第二个开发者添加了如下评论(为了保护不那么无辜的人,名字被隐藏了):

'This code was written by **************.
'I haven't a clue what it does. He hasn't a clue what it does.
'Nobody else has a clue what it does or how it does it.
'It is something to do with data but **** knows what.
'The ******* still works so please do not change this code,
'even though it is a complete pile of ****.

那我为什么不觉得有趣呢?嗯,这是一个客户内部网的ASP代码。

...正是那位顾客向我强调了这条评论。

:-(