一个与类型无关的变体（已更新-感谢Volley实例化T）：

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public static <T> T[] join(T[]...arrays) {

    final List<T> output = new ArrayList<T>();

    for(T[] array : arrays) {
        output.addAll(Arrays.asList(array));
    }

    return output.toArray((T[])Array.newInstance(
        arrays[0].getClass().getComponentType(), output.size()));
}

算法爱好者的另一个答案是：

public static String[] mergeArrays(String[] array1, String[] array2) {
    int totalSize = array1.length + array2.length; // Get total size
    String[] merged = new String[totalSize]; // Create new array
    // Loop over the total size
    for (int i = 0; i < totalSize; i++) {
        if (i < array1.length) // If the current position is less than the length of the first array, take value from first array
            merged[i] = array1[i]; // Position in first array is the current position

        else // If current position is equal or greater than the first array, take value from second array.
            merged[i] = array2[i - array1.length]; // Position in second array is current position minus length of first array.
    }

    return merged;

用法：

String[] array1str = new String[]{"a", "b", "c", "d"}; 
String[] array2str = new String[]{"e", "f", "g", "h", "i"};
String[] listTotalstr = mergeArrays(array1str, array2str);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(listTotalstr));

结果：

[a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i]

我认为泛型的最佳解决方案是：

/* This for non primitive types */
public static <T> T[] concatenate (T[]... elements) {

    T[] C = null;
    for (T[] element: elements) {
        if (element==null) continue;
        if (C==null) C = (T[]) Array.newInstance(element.getClass().getComponentType(), element.length);
        else C = resizeArray(C, C.length+element.length);

        System.arraycopy(element, 0, C, C.length-element.length, element.length);
    }

    return C;
}

/**
 * as far as i know, primitive types do not accept generics 
 * http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2721546/why-dont-java-generics-support-primitive-types
 * for primitive types we could do something like this:
 * */
public static int[] concatenate (int[]... elements){
    int[] C = null;
    for (int[] element: elements) {
        if (element==null) continue;
        if (C==null) C = new int[element.length];
        else C = resizeArray(C, C.length+element.length);

        System.arraycopy(element, 0, C, C.length-element.length, element.length);
    }
    return C;
}

private static <T> T resizeArray (T array, int newSize) {
    int oldSize =
            java.lang.reflect.Array.getLength(array);
    Class elementType =
            array.getClass().getComponentType();
    Object newArray =
            java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance(
                    elementType, newSize);
    int preserveLength = Math.min(oldSize, newSize);
    if (preserveLength > 0)
        System.arraycopy(array, 0,
                newArray, 0, preserveLength);
    return (T) newArray;
}

我最近一直在与过度的记忆循环作斗争。如果已知a和/或b通常是空的，这里是silvertab代码的另一种修改（也被通用化）：

private static <T> T[] concatOrReturnSame(T[] a, T[] b) {
    final int alen = a.length;
    final int blen = b.length;
    if (alen == 0) {
        return b;
    }
    if (blen == 0) {
        return a;
    }
    final T[] result = (T[]) java.lang.reflect.Array.
            newInstance(a.getClass().getComponentType(), alen + blen);
    System.arraycopy(a, 0, result, 0, alen);
    System.arraycopy(b, 0, result, alen, blen);
    return result;
}

编辑：这篇文章的前一个版本指出，像这样的数组重用应该清楚地记录下来。正如Maarten在评论中指出的那样，一般来说，最好删除if语句，这样就不需要文档了。但话说回来，那些if语句首先就是这个特定优化的要点。我会在这里留下这个答案，但要小心！

您可以尝试将其转换为ArrayList，然后使用addAll方法将其转换回数组。

List list = new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(first));
  list.addAll(Arrays.asList(second));
  String[] both = list.toArray();

使用Java集合

好吧，Java没有提供连接数组的助手方法。然而，自Java5以来，Collections实用程序类引入了addAll（Collection＜？super T＞c，T…elements）方法。

我们可以创建一个List对象，然后调用该方法两次，将这两个数组添加到列表中。最后，我们将生成的List转换回数组：

static <T> T[] concatWithCollection(T[] array1, T[] array2) {
    List<T> resultList = new ArrayList<>(array1.length + array2.length);
    Collections.addAll(resultList, array1);
    Collections.addAll(resultList, array2);

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    //the type cast is safe as the array1 has the type T[]
    T[] resultArray = (T[]) Array.newInstance(array1.getClass().getComponentType(), 0);
    return resultList.toArray(resultArray);
}

Test

@Test
public void givenTwoStringArrays_whenConcatWithList_thenGetExpectedResult() {
    String[] result = ArrayConcatUtil.concatWithCollection(strArray1, strArray2);
    assertThat(result).isEqualTo(expectedStringArray);
}