鉴于这是谷歌上“静态类java”的最高结果，最好的答案不在这里，我想我应该添加它。我将OP的问题解释为c#中的静态类，这些类在Java世界中被称为单例。对于那些不知道的人，在c#中“static”关键字可以应用于类声明，这意味着生成的类永远不能被实例化。

摘自Joshua Bloch的“Effective Java - Second Edition”(被广泛认为是最好的Java风格指南之一):

As of release 1.5, there is a third approach to implementing singletons. Simply make an enum type with one element: // Enum singleton - the preferred approach public enum Elvis { INSTANCE; public void leaveTheBuilding() { ... } } This approach is functionally equivalent to the public field approach, except that it is more concise, provides the serialization machinery for free , and provides an ironclad guarantee against multiple instantiation, even in the face of sophisticated serialization or reflection attacks. While this approach has yet to be widely adopted, a single-element enum type is the best way to implement a singleton. (emphasis author's)

约书亚•布洛赫(2008-05-08)。Effective Java (Java系列)(第18页)。培生教育。

我认为实现和证明是不言自明的。

好吧，Java有“静态嵌套类”，但它们与c#的静态类完全不一样，如果你是从那里来的的话。静态嵌套类只是一个没有隐式引用外部类实例的类。

静态嵌套类可以有实例方法和静态方法。

在Java中没有顶级静态类这种东西。

有一个静态嵌套类，这个[静态嵌套]类不需要一个外围类的实例来实例化自己。

这些类[静态嵌套类]只能访问外围类的静态成员[因为它没有任何对外围类实例的引用…]

代码示例:

public class Test { 
  class A { } 
  static class B { }
  public static void main(String[] args) { 
    /*will fail - compilation error, you need an instance of Test to instantiate A*/
    A a = new A(); 
    /*will compile successfully, not instance of Test is needed to instantiate B */
    B b = new B(); 
  }
}

Java中的类可以是静态的吗?

答案是肯定的，我们可以在java中有静态类。在java中，我们有静态实例变量、静态方法和静态块。在Java中，类也可以是静态的。

在java中，我们不能使顶级(外部)类是静态的。只有嵌套类可以是静态的。

静态嵌套类vs非静态嵌套类

1)嵌套静态类不需要外部类的引用，但是 非静态嵌套类或内部类需要外部类 参考。

2)内部类(或非静态嵌套类)既可以访问静态 和Outer类的非静态成员。静态类不能访问Outer类的非静态成员。它只能访问静态 外层阶级的成员。

请看这里:https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/nested.html

静态方法意味着可以在不创建类对象的情况下访问它，这与public方法不同:

public class MyClass {
   // Static method
   static void myStaticMethod() {
      System.out.println("Static methods can be called without creating objects");
   }

  // Public method
  public void myPublicMethod() {
      System.out.println("Public methods must be called by creating objects");
   }

  // Main method
  public static void main(String[ ] args) {
      myStaticMethod(); // Call the static method
    // myPublicMethod(); This would output an error

    MyClass myObj = new MyClass(); // Create an object of MyClass
    myObj.myPublicMethod(); // Call the public method
  }
}

Java有静态嵌套类，但听起来像是在寻找顶级静态类。Java没有办法让顶级类成为静态的，但是你可以像这样模拟一个静态类:

Declare your class final - Prevents extension of the class since extending a static class makes no sense Make the constructor private - Prevents instantiation by client code as it makes no sense to instantiate a static class Make all the members and functions of the class static - Since the class cannot be instantiated no instance methods can be called or instance fields accessed Note that the compiler will not prevent you from declaring an instance (non-static) member. The issue will only show up if you attempt to call the instance member

以上建议的简单例子:

public class TestMyStaticClass {
     public static void main(String []args){
        MyStaticClass.setMyStaticMember(5);
        System.out.println("Static value: " + MyStaticClass.getMyStaticMember());
        System.out.println("Value squared: " + MyStaticClass.squareMyStaticMember());
        // MyStaticClass x = new MyStaticClass(); // results in compile time error
     }
}

// A top-level Java class mimicking static class behavior
public final class MyStaticClass {
    private MyStaticClass () { // private constructor
        myStaticMember = 1;
    }
    private static int myStaticMember;
    public static void setMyStaticMember(int val) {
        myStaticMember = val;
    }
    public static int getMyStaticMember() {
        return myStaticMember;
    }
    public static int squareMyStaticMember() {
        return myStaticMember * myStaticMember;
    }
}

What good are static classes? A good use of a static class is in defining one-off, utility and/or library classes where instantiation would not make sense. A great example is the Math class that contains some mathematical constants such as PI and E and simply provides mathematical calculations. Requiring instantiation in such a case would be unnecessary and confusing. See the Math class and source code. Notice that it is final and all of its members are static. If Java allowed top-level classes to be declared static then the Math class would indeed be static.