我有一个这样的测试:
[TestCase("~/page/myaction")]
public void Page_With_Custom_Action(string path) {
// Arrange
var pathData = new Mock<IPathData>();
var pageModel = new Mock<IPageModel>();
var repository = new Mock<IPageRepository>();
var mapper = new Mock<IControllerMapper>();
var container = new Mock<IContainer>();
container.Setup(x => x.GetInstance<IPageRepository>()).Returns(repository.Object);
repository.Setup(x => x.GetPageByUrl<IPageModel>(path)).Returns(() => pageModel.Object);
pathData.Setup(x => x.Action).Returns("myaction");
pathData.Setup(x => x.Controller).Returns("page");
var resolver = new DashboardPathResolver(pathData.Object, repository.Object, mapper.Object, container.Object);
// Act
var data = resolver.ResolvePath(path);
// Assert
Assert.NotNull(data);
Assert.AreEqual("myaction", data.Action);
Assert.AreEqual("page", data.Controller);
}
GetPageByUrl在我的DashboardPathResolver运行两次,我怎么能告诉Moq第一次返回null和pageModel。反对第二个?
接受的答案,以及SetupSequence答案,处理返回的常量。
Returns()有一些有用的重载,您可以根据发送给模拟方法的参数返回一个值。基于已接受答案中给出的解决方案,下面是针对这些重载的另一种扩展方法。
public static class MoqExtensions
{
public static IReturnsResult<TMock> ReturnsInOrder<TMock, TResult, T1>(this ISetup<TMock, TResult> setup, params Func<T1, TResult>[] valueFunctions)
where TMock : class
{
var queue = new Queue<Func<T1, TResult>>(valueFunctions);
return setup.Returns<T1>(arg => queue.Dequeue()(arg));
}
}
不幸的是,使用该方法需要指定一些模板参数,但结果仍然是可读的。
repository
.Setup(x => x.GetPageByUrl<IPageModel>(path))
.ReturnsInOrder(new Func<string, IPageModel>[]
{
p => null, // Here, the return value can depend on the path parameter
p => pageModel.Object,
});
如果需要的话,用多个参数(T2、T3等)为扩展方法创建重载。
在某些情况下,需要让被调用的函数返回不同类型的数据,这些数据基于你不能通过函数本身施加的条件。如果函数接受参数,那么这些参数可以作为条件来获得不同的数据。
在我的情况下,我有一个webapi调用,我需要mock;早些时候,它基于输入参数很好地工作,然而有一天,这些参数被转换为请求头。因此,由于我不能提供回调(没有函数参数),所以提出了另一种方法如下
[早些时候,API有参数时]
this.mockedMasterAPICalls.Setup(m => m.GetCountries(It.Is<int>(ou => ou == 2), It.Is<int>(lan => lan == 1))).Returns(Task.FromResult(countryResponse));
[新的,当API有头…报头被注入到API调用者的另一个字典中]
this.mockedMasterAPICalls.Setup(m => m.RequestHeaders).Returns(new Dictionary<string, string>());
this.mockedMasterAPICalls.Setup(m => m.GetCountries()).Returns(() =>
{
if (this.mockedMasterAPICalls.Object.RequestHeaders[GlobalConstants.HeaderOUInstance] == "2")
return Task.FromResult(countryResponse);
else return Task.FromResult(new GetCountryResponse() { Countries = null });
});
注意使用模拟对象本身来做出所需的任何决定
添加回调对我来说不起作用,我使用这种方法代替http://haacked.com/archive/2009/09/29/moq-sequences.aspx,我最终得到了这样的测试:
[TestCase("~/page/myaction")]
[TestCase("~/page/myaction/")]
public void Page_With_Custom_Action(string virtualUrl) {
// Arrange
var pathData = new Mock<IPathData>();
var pageModel = new Mock<IPageModel>();
var repository = new Mock<IPageRepository>();
var mapper = new Mock<IControllerMapper>();
var container = new Mock<IContainer>();
container.Setup(x => x.GetInstance<IPageRepository>()).Returns(repository.Object);
repository.Setup(x => x.GetPageByUrl<IPageModel>(virtualUrl)).ReturnsInOrder(null, pageModel.Object);
pathData.Setup(x => x.Action).Returns("myaction");
pathData.Setup(x => x.Controller).Returns("page");
var resolver = new DashboardPathResolver(pathData.Object, repository.Object, mapper.Object, container.Object);
// Act
var data = resolver.ResolvePath(virtualUrl);
// Assert
Assert.NotNull(data);
Assert.AreEqual("myaction", data.Action);
Assert.AreEqual("page", data.Controller);
}