你也可以有这样的东西:

class Entity {
    id: number;

    constructor(id: number) {
        this.id = id;
    }

    clone(): this {
        return new (this.constructor as typeof Entity)(this.id) as this;
    }
}

class Customer extends Entity {
    name: string;

    constructor(id: number, name: string) {
        super(id);
        this.name = name;
    }

    clone(): this {
        return new (this.constructor as typeof Customer)(this.id, this.name) as this;
    }
}

只是要确保在所有Entity子类中覆盖clone方法，否则最终会得到部分克隆。

它的返回类型将始终与实例的类型匹配。

如果你已经有了目标对象，所以你不想重新创建它(就像更新一个数组一样)，你必须复制属性。 如果这样做:

Object.keys(source).forEach((key) => {
    copy[key] = source[key]
})

赞美是应得的。(请看标题“版本2”)

下面是deepCopy在TypeScript中的实现(代码中不包含任何内容):

const deepCopy = <T, U = T extends Array<infer V> ? V : never>(source: T ): T => {
  if (Array.isArray(source)) {
    return source.map(item => (deepCopy(item))) as T & U[]
  }
  if (source instanceof Date) {
    return new Date(source.getTime()) as T & Date
  }
  if (source && typeof source === 'object') {
    return (Object.getOwnPropertyNames(source) as (keyof T)[]).reduce<T>((o, prop) => {
      Object.defineProperty(o, prop, Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(source, prop)!)
      o[prop] = deepCopy(source[prop])
      return o
    }, Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(source)))
  }
  return source
}

自从TypeScript 3.7发布以来，现在支持递归类型别名，它允许我们定义一个类型安全的deepCopy()函数:

// DeepCopy type can be easily extended by other types,
// like Set & Map if the implementation supports them.
type DeepCopy<T> =
    T extends undefined | null | boolean | string | number ? T :
    T extends Function | Set<any> | Map<any, any> ? unknown :
    T extends ReadonlyArray<infer U> ? Array<DeepCopy<U>> :
    { [K in keyof T]: DeepCopy<T[K]> };

function deepCopy<T>(obj: T): DeepCopy<T> {
    // implementation doesn't matter, just use the simplest
    return JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(obj));
}

interface User {
    name: string,
    achievements: readonly string[],
    extras?: {
        city: string;
    }
}

type UncopiableUser = User & {
    delete: () => void
};

declare const user: User;
const userCopy: User = deepCopy(user); // no errors

declare const uncopiableUser: UncopiableUser;
const uncopiableUserCopy: UncopiableUser = deepCopy(uncopiableUser); // compile time error

操场上

在typeScript中，我用angular进行了测试，结果还不错

deepCopy(obj) {


        var copy;

        // Handle the 3 simple types, and null or undefined
        if (null == obj || "object" != typeof obj) return obj;

        // Handle Date
        if (obj instanceof Date) {
            copy = new Date();
            copy.setTime(obj.getTime());
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Array
        if (obj instanceof Array) {
            copy = [];
            for (var i = 0, len = obj.length; i < len; i++) {
                copy[i] = this.deepCopy(obj[i]);
            }
            return copy;
        }

        // Handle Object
        if (obj instanceof Object) {
            copy = {};
            for (var attr in obj) {
                if (obj.hasOwnProperty(attr)) copy[attr] = this.deepCopy(obj[attr]);
            }
            return copy;
        }

        throw new Error("Unable to copy obj! Its type isn't supported.");
    }

我的看法是:

Object.assign(…)只复制属性，我们丢失了原型和方法。

Object.create(…)不是为我复制属性，只是创建一个原型。

对我有用的是使用Object.create(…)创建一个原型，并使用Object.assign(…)将属性复制到它:

因此对于对象foo，像这样进行克隆:

Object.assign(Object.create(foo), foo)