我不知道这在您的设置中是否可能是一个问题，但根据您的RDBMS，列的值可能是区分大小写的。PostgreSQL文档说:“如果你声明一个列为UNIQUE或PRIMARY KEY，隐式生成的索引是区分大小写的”。换句话说，如果您在一个以email为主键的表中接受用户输入进行搜索，并且用户提供“John@Doe.com”，那么您将找不到“john@doe.com”。

不要使用电子邮件地址为主键，保持电子邮件的唯一性，但不要使用它为主键，使用用户id或用户名为主键

如果你有一个非int值作为主键，那么在大数据上插入和检索将会非常慢。

您应该使用整数主键。如果你需要电子邮件列是唯一的，为什么不简单地在该列上设置一个唯一索引呢?

我知道这有点晚了，但我想补充的是，人们放弃电子邮件帐户和服务提供商恢复地址，允许其他人使用它。

正如@HLGEM指出的那样，“Jsmith@somecompany.com很容易在一年后属于约翰·史密斯，两年后属于朱莉娅·史密斯。”在这种情况下，如果约翰·史密斯想要你的服务，你要么拒绝使用他的电子邮件地址，要么删除所有与朱莉娅·史密斯有关的记录。

如果你必须根据当地法律删除与企业财务历史有关的记录，你可能会发现自己陷入困境。

所以我永远不会使用电子邮件地址、车牌等数据作为主键，因为无论它们看起来多么独特，它们都不受你的控制，并且可能会提供一些你可能没有时间处理的有趣挑战。

使用电子邮件地址作为主键的缺点:

Slower when doing joins. Any other record with a posted foreign key now has a larger value, taking up more disk space. (Given the cost of disk space today, this is probably a trivial issue, except to the extent that the record now takes longer to read. See #1.) An email address could change, which forces all records using this as a foreign key to be updated. As email address don't change all that often, the performance problem is probably minor. The bigger problem is that you have to make sure to provide for it. If you have to write the code, this is more work and introduces the possibility of bugs. If your database engine supports "on update cascade", it's a minor issue.

使用电邮地址作主键的优点:

You may be able to completely eliminate some joins. If all you need from the "master record" is the email address, then with an abstract integer key you would have to do a join to retrieve it. If the key is the email address, then you already have it and the join is unnecessary. Whether this helps you any depends on how often this situation comes up. When you are doing ad hoc queries, it's easy for a human being to see what master record is being referenced. This can be a big help when trying to track down data problems. You almost certainly will need an index on the email address anyway, so making it the primary key eliminates one index, thus improving the performance of inserts as they now have only one index to update instead of two.

在我看来，这两种情况都不是十拿九稳的。当有实用的键时，我倾向于使用自然键，因为它们更容易使用，而且在大多数情况下，缺点并不太重要。