我使用的是Json。将类序列化为JSON。
我的课程是这样的:
class Test1
{
[JsonProperty("id")]
public string ID { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("label")]
public string Label { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("url")]
public string URL { get; set; }
[JsonProperty("item")]
public List<Test2> Test2List { get; set; }
}
我想仅当Test2List为空时才向Test2List属性添加JsonIgnore()属性。如果它不是空的,那么我想包括它在我的json。
正如James Newton King所述:如果你自己创建序列化器,而不是使用JavaScriptConvert,那么你可以将NullValueHandling属性设置为忽略。
下面是一个例子:
JsonSerializer _jsonWriter = new JsonSerializer {
NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore
};
或者,按照@amit的建议
JsonConvert.SerializeObject(myObject,
Newtonsoft.Json.Formatting.None,
new JsonSerializerSettings {
NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore
});
这里有一个类似的选项,但提供了另一种选择:
public class DefaultJsonSerializer : JsonSerializerSettings
{
public DefaultJsonSerializer()
{
NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore;
}
}
然后,我这样使用它:
JsonConvert.SerializeObject(postObj, new DefaultJsonSerializer());
不同之处在于:
Reduces repeated code by instantiating and configuring JsonSerializerSettings each place it's used.
Saves time in configuring every property of every object to be serialized.
Still gives other developers flexibility in serialization options, rather than having the property explicitly specified on a reusable object.
My use-case is that the code is a 3rd party library and I don't want to force serialization options on developers who would want to reuse my classes.
Potential drawbacks are that it's another object that other developers would need to know about, or if your application is small and this approach wouldn't matter for a single serialization.
@Mrchief / @amit的答案的改编,但适用于使用VB的人
Dim JSONOut As String = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(
myContainerObject,
New JsonSerializerSettings With {
.NullValueHandling = NullValueHandling.Ignore
}
)
看到的:
对象初始化器:命名和匿名类型(Visual Basic)
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb385125.aspx