我知道我在这方面非常晚，但我提出了一个相当灵活的模式，应该允许一些真正有趣和通用的实现。

像往常一样设置类，使用您喜欢的任何变量。

class MyClass{ protected $myVar1; protected $myVar2; public function __construct($obj = null){ if($obj){ foreach (((object)$obj) as $key => $value) { if(isset($value) && in_array($key, array_keys(get_object_vars($this)))){ $this->$key = $value; } } } } } When you make your object just pass an associative array with the keys of the array the same as the names of your vars, like so... $sample_variable = new MyClass([ 'myVar2'=>123, 'i_dont_want_this_one'=> 'This won\'t make it into the class' ]); print_r($sample_variable); The print_r($sample_variable); after this instantiation yields the following: MyClass Object ( [myVar1:protected] => [myVar2:protected] => 123 ) Because we've initialize $group to null in our __construct(...), it is also valid to pass nothing whatsoever into the constructor as well, like so... $sample_variable = new MyClass(); print_r($sample_variable); Now the output is exactly as expected: MyClass Object ( [myVar1:protected] => [myVar2:protected] => ) The reason I wrote this was so that I could directly pass the output of json_decode(...) to my constructor, and not worry about it too much. This was executed in PHP 7.1. Enjoy!

你可以像下面这样做，非常简单明了:

public function __construct()    
{
   $arguments = func_get_args(); 

   switch(sizeof(func_get_args()))      
   {
    case 0: //No arguments
        break; 
    case 1: //One argument
        $this->do_something($arguments[0]); 
        break;              
    case 2:  //Two arguments
        $this->do_something_else($arguments[0], $arguments[1]); 
        break;            
   }
}

我知道我在这方面非常晚，但我提出了一个相当灵活的模式，应该允许一些真正有趣和通用的实现。

像往常一样设置类，使用您喜欢的任何变量。

class MyClass{ protected $myVar1; protected $myVar2; public function __construct($obj = null){ if($obj){ foreach (((object)$obj) as $key => $value) { if(isset($value) && in_array($key, array_keys(get_object_vars($this)))){ $this->$key = $value; } } } } } When you make your object just pass an associative array with the keys of the array the same as the names of your vars, like so... $sample_variable = new MyClass([ 'myVar2'=>123, 'i_dont_want_this_one'=> 'This won\'t make it into the class' ]); print_r($sample_variable); The print_r($sample_variable); after this instantiation yields the following: MyClass Object ( [myVar1:protected] => [myVar2:protected] => 123 ) Because we've initialize $group to null in our __construct(...), it is also valid to pass nothing whatsoever into the constructor as well, like so... $sample_variable = new MyClass(); print_r($sample_variable); Now the output is exactly as expected: MyClass Object ( [myVar1:protected] => [myVar2:protected] => ) The reason I wrote this was so that I could directly pass the output of json_decode(...) to my constructor, and not worry about it too much. This was executed in PHP 7.1. Enjoy!

Kris的回答很好，但正如Buttle Butku评论的那样，新的static()将在PHP 5.3+中被首选。

所以我会这样做(根据克里斯的回答修改):

<?php

class Student
{
    public function __construct() {
        // allocate your stuff
    }

    public static function withID( $id ) {
        $instance = new static();
        $instance->loadByID( $id );
        return $instance;
    }

    public static function withRow( array $row ) {
        $instance = new static();
        $instance->fill( $row );
        return $instance;
    }

    protected function loadByID( $id ) {
        // do query
        $row = my_awesome_db_access_stuff( $id );
        $this->fill( $row );
    }

    protected function fill( array $row ) {
        // fill all properties from array
    }
}

?>

用法:

<?php

$student1 = Student::withID($id);
$student2 = Student::withRow($row);

?>

我还在php.net OOP文档中找到了一个有用的例子。

另一种选择是像这样在构造函数中使用默认参数

class Student {

    private $id;
    private $name;
    //...

    public function __construct($id, $row=array()) {
        $this->id = $id;
        foreach($row as $key => $value) $this->$key = $value;
    }
}

这意味着你需要实例化一行像这样:$student = new student ($row['id']， $row)，但保持你的构造函数漂亮和干净。

另一方面，如果你想利用多态性，那么你可以创建两个类，像这样:

class Student {

    public function __construct($row) {
         foreach($row as $key => $value) $this->$key = $value;
    }
}

class EmptyStudent extends Student {

    public function __construct($id) {
        parent::__construct(array('id' => $id));
    }
}

这个问题已经用非常聪明的方法回答了，但我想知道为什么不退一步，问一个基本的问题，为什么我们需要一个有两个构造函数的类? 如果我的类需要两个构造函数，那么我设计类的方式可能需要更多的考虑，以提出一个更干净、更可测试的设计。

我们正在尝试混合如何实例化一个类与实际的类逻辑。

如果一个学生对象是在一个有效的状态，那么它是否从一个DB或从一个web表单或cli请求的数据行构造?

现在回答这个问题,可能出现的,如果我们不添加从db行创建一个对象的逻辑,那么我们如何创建一个对象从数据库数据,我们可以简单地添加另一个类,称之为StudentMapper如果你熟悉数据映射模式,在某些情况下,您可以使用StudentRepository,如果没有适合你的需要你可以StudentFactory处理所有类型的对象建设任务。

当我们在处理领域对象时，底线是不要考虑持久化层。