我发现它更方便访问字典键作为obj。foo而不是obj['foo']，所以我写了这个片段:
class AttributeDict(dict):
def __getattr__(self, attr):
return self[attr]
def __setattr__(self, attr, value):
self[attr] = value
然而，我认为一定有一些原因，Python没有提供开箱即用的功能。以这种方式访问字典键的注意事项和缺陷是什么?
当前回答
这个答案摘自Luciano Ramalho的《流利的Python》一书。这要归功于那个家伙。
class AttrDict:
"""A read-only façade for navigating a JSON-like object
using attribute notation
"""
def __init__(self, mapping):
self._data = dict(mapping)
def __getattr__(self, name):
if hasattr(self._data, name):
return getattr(self._data, name)
else:
return AttrDict.build(self._data[name])
@classmethod
def build(cls, obj):
if isinstance(obj, Mapping):
return cls(obj)
elif isinstance(obj, MutableSequence):
return [cls.build(item) for item in obj]
else:
return obj
in the init we are taking the dict and making it a dictionary. when getattr is used we try to get the attribute from the dict if the dict already has that attribute. or else we are passing the argument to a class method called build. now build does the intresting thing. if the object is dict or a mapping like that, the that object is made an attr dict itself. if it's a sequence like list, it's passed to the build function we r on right now. if it's anythin else, like str or int. return the object itself.
其他回答
这个答案摘自Luciano Ramalho的《流利的Python》一书。这要归功于那个家伙。
class AttrDict:
"""A read-only façade for navigating a JSON-like object
using attribute notation
"""
def __init__(self, mapping):
self._data = dict(mapping)
def __getattr__(self, name):
if hasattr(self._data, name):
return getattr(self._data, name)
else:
return AttrDict.build(self._data[name])
@classmethod
def build(cls, obj):
if isinstance(obj, Mapping):
return cls(obj)
elif isinstance(obj, MutableSequence):
return [cls.build(item) for item in obj]
else:
return obj
in the init we are taking the dict and making it a dictionary. when getattr is used we try to get the attribute from the dict if the dict already has that attribute. or else we are passing the argument to a class method called build. now build does the intresting thing. if the object is dict or a mapping like that, the that object is made an attr dict itself. if it's a sequence like list, it's passed to the build function we r on right now. if it's anythin else, like str or int. return the object itself.
以这种方式访问字典键的注意事项和缺陷是什么?
正如@Henry所指出的，在dict中不能使用点访问的一个原因是，它将dict键名限制为python有效变量，从而限制了所有可能的名称。
下面是一些例子，说明为什么在给定字典d的情况下，点点访问通常没有帮助:
有效性
以下属性在Python中是无效的:
d.1_foo # enumerated names
d./bar # path names
d.21.7, d.12:30 # decimals, time
d."" # empty strings
d.john doe, d.denny's # spaces, misc punctuation
d.3 * x # expressions
风格
PEP8约定将对属性命名施加软约束:
A.保留关键字(或内置函数)名称:
d.in
d.False, d.True
d.max, d.min
d.sum
d.id
如果函数参数的名称与保留关键字冲突，通常最好在后面添加一个下划线…
B.方法和变量名的大小写规则:
变量名遵循与函数名相同的约定。
d.Firstname
d.Country
使用函数命名规则:小写字母，单词之间用下划线分隔，以提高可读性。
有时，在pandas这样的库中会出现这些问题，这些库允许按名称点访问DataFrame列。解决命名限制的默认机制也是数组表示法——括号中的字符串。
如果这些约束不适用于您的用例，那么在点访问数据结构上有几个选项。
product怎么样，我写了一个小小的Python类来统治它们:)
此外，您还可以获得自动代码完成、递归对象实例化和自动类型转换!
你完全可以做到你所要求的:
p = Prodict()
p.foo = 1
p.bar = "baz"
例1:类型提示
class Country(Prodict):
name: str
population: int
turkey = Country()
turkey.name = 'Turkey'
turkey.population = 79814871
例2:自动类型转换
germany = Country(name='Germany', population='82175700', flag_colors=['black', 'red', 'yellow'])
print(germany.population) # 82175700
print(type(germany.population)) # <class 'int'>
print(germany.flag_colors) # ['black', 'red', 'yellow']
print(type(germany.flag_colors)) # <class 'list'>
最简单的方法是定义一个类，我们称之为Namespace。在字典上使用对象dict.update()。然后，字典将被视为一个对象。
class Namespace(object):
'''
helps referencing object in a dictionary as dict.key instead of dict['key']
'''
def __init__(self, adict):
self.__dict__.update(adict)
Person = Namespace({'name': 'ahmed',
'age': 30}) #--> added for edge_cls
print(Person.name)
这就是我用的
args = {
'batch_size': 32,
'workers': 4,
'train_dir': 'train',
'val_dir': 'val',
'lr': 1e-3,
'momentum': 0.9,
'weight_decay': 1e-4
}
args = namedtuple('Args', ' '.join(list(args.keys())))(**args)
print (args.lr)
