我通常使用以下习语来检查String是否可以转换为整数。

public boolean isInteger( String input ) {
    try {
        Integer.parseInt( input );
        return true;
    }
    catch( Exception e ) {
        return false;
    }
}

是我的错觉,还是你觉得这有点粗俗?还有什么更好的办法吗?


看看我的回答(带有基准,基于CodingWithSpike之前的回答),看看为什么我改变了立场,接受了Jonas Klemming对这个问题的回答。我认为大多数人都会使用这个原始代码,因为它实现起来更快,也更易于维护,但是当提供非整数数据时,它就慢了几个数量级。


当前回答

对于那些像我一样多年后才来到这里的读者,对于这个问题,我有一个更通用的解决方案。

/**
 * Checks, if the string represents a number.
 *
 * @param string the string
 * @return true, if the string is a number
 */
public static boolean isANumber(final String string) {
    if (string != null) {
        final int length = string.length();
        if (length != 0) {
            int i = 0;
            if (string.charAt(0) == '-') {
                if (length == 1) {
                    return false;
                }
                i++;
            }
            for (; i < length; i++) {
                final char c = string.charAt(i);
                if ((c <= PERIOD) || ((c >= COLON))) {
                    final String strC = Character.toString(c).toUpperCase();
                    final boolean isExponent = strC.equals("E");
                    final boolean isPeriod = (c == PERIOD);
                    final boolean isPlus = (c == PLUS);

                    if (!isExponent && !isPeriod && !isPlus) {
                        return false;
                    }
                }
            }
            return true;
        }
    }
    return false;
}

其他回答

这只适用于正整数。

public static boolean isInt(String str) {
    if (str != null && str.length() != 0) {
        for (int i = 0; i < str.length(); i++) {
            if (!Character.isDigit(str.charAt(i))) return false;
        }
    }
    return true;        
}

做了一个快速的基准测试。异常实际上并没有那么昂贵,除非您开始弹出多个方法,JVM必须做大量工作才能使执行堆栈就位。如果保持相同的方法,他们就不会表现不好。

 public void RunTests()
 {
     String str = "1234567890";

     long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
         IsInt_ByException(str);
     long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     System.out.print("ByException: ");
     System.out.println(endTime - startTime);

     startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
         IsInt_ByRegex(str);
     endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     System.out.print("ByRegex: ");
     System.out.println(endTime - startTime);

     startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
         IsInt_ByJonas(str);
     endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
     System.out.print("ByJonas: ");
     System.out.println(endTime - startTime);
 }

 private boolean IsInt_ByException(String str)
 {
     try
     {
         Integer.parseInt(str);
         return true;
     }
     catch(NumberFormatException nfe)
     {
         return false;
     }
 }

 private boolean IsInt_ByRegex(String str)
 {
     return str.matches("^-?\\d+$");
 }

 public boolean IsInt_ByJonas(String str)
 {
     if (str == null) {
             return false;
     }
     int length = str.length();
     if (length == 0) {
             return false;
     }
     int i = 0;
     if (str.charAt(0) == '-') {
             if (length == 1) {
                     return false;
             }
             i = 1;
     }
     for (; i < length; i++) {
             char c = str.charAt(i);
             if (c <= '/' || c >= ':') {
                     return false;
             }
     }
     return true;
 }

输出:

ByException: 31 ByRegex: 453(注意:每次都重新编译模式) ByJonas: 16

我也同意Jonas K的解决方案是最稳健的。看起来他赢了:)

如果你正在使用Android API,你可以使用:

TextUtils.isDigitsOnly(str);

我不喜欢方法与regex,因为regex不能检查范围(整数。MIN_VALUE Integer.MAX_VALUE)。

如果你希望在大多数情况下使用int值,而不是int值是不常见的,那么我建议使用Integer。valueOf或Integer。parseInt与NumberFormatException捕获。这种方法的优点-你的代码有很好的可读性:

public static boolean isInt(String s) {
  try {
    Integer.parseInt(s);
    return true;
  } catch (NumberFormatException nfe) {
    return false;
  }
}

如果你需要检查String是否为整数,并且关心性能,那么最好的方法是使用java jdk实现的integer。parseInt,但很少修改(用return false替换throw):

该功能性能良好,保证正确的结果:

   public static boolean isInt(String s) {
    int radix = 10;

    if (s == null) {
        return false;
    }

    if (radix < Character.MIN_RADIX) {
        return false;
    }

    if (radix > Character.MAX_RADIX) {
        return false;
    }

    int result = 0;
    boolean negative = false;
    int i = 0, len = s.length();
    int limit = -Integer.MAX_VALUE;
    int multmin;
    int digit;

    if (len > 0) {
        char firstChar = s.charAt(0);
        if (firstChar < '0') { // Possible leading "+" or "-"
            if (firstChar == '-') {
                negative = true;
                limit = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
            } else if (firstChar != '+')
                return false;

            if (len == 1) // Cannot have lone "+" or "-"
                return false;
            i++;
        }
        multmin = limit / radix;
        while (i < len) {
            // Accumulating negatively avoids surprises near MAX_VALUE
            digit = Character.digit(s.charAt(i++), radix);
            if (digit < 0) {
                return false;
            }
            if (result < multmin) {
                return false;
            }
            result *= radix;
            if (result < limit + digit) {
                return false;
            }
            result -= digit;
        }
    } else {
        return false;
    }
    return true;
}

I recently (today) needed to figure out a quick way to do this and of course I was going to use the exception approach for ease when the monkey on the shoulder (conscience) woke up so it took me down this old familiar rabbit hole; no exceptions are not that much more expensive in fact sometimes exceptions are faster (old AIX multiprocessor systems) but regardless it’s to elegant so I did something that the younger me never did and to my amazement nobody here did either (apologize if someone did and I missed it I honestly did not find) : so what did I think we all missed; taking a look at how the JRE implemented it, yes they threw an exception but we can always skip that part.

10年前年轻的我可能会觉得这有失他的身份,但话又说回来,他是一个大嘴巴的炫耀者,性情不好,有一种神的情结,所以就是这样。

我把这些放在这里,是为了方便将来来这里的人。以下是我的发现:

public static int parseInt(String s, int radix) throws NumberFormatException
{
    /*
     * WARNING: This method may be invoked early during VM initialization
     * before IntegerCache is initialized. Care must be taken to not use
     * the valueOf method.
     */

    if (s == null) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("null");
    }

    if (radix < Character.MIN_RADIX) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
                                        " less than Character.MIN_RADIX");
    }

    if (radix > Character.MAX_RADIX) {
        throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
                                        " greater than Character.MAX_RADIX");
    }

    int result = 0;
    boolean negative = false;
    int i = 0, len = s.length();
    int limit = -Integer.MAX_VALUE;
    int multmin;
    int digit;

    if (len > 0) {
        char firstChar = s.charAt(0);
        if (firstChar < '0') { // Possible leading "+" or "-"
            if (firstChar == '-') {
                negative = true;
                limit = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
            } else if (firstChar != '+')
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);

            if (len == 1) // Cannot have lone "+" or "-"
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
            i++;
        }
        multmin = limit / radix;
        while (i < len) {
            // Accumulating negatively avoids surprises near MAX_VALUE
            digit = Character.digit(s.charAt(i++),radix);
            if (digit < 0) {
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
            }
            if (result < multmin) {
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
            }
            result *= radix;
            if (result < limit + digit) {
                throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
            }
            result -= digit;
        }
    } else {
        throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
    }
    return negative ? result : -result;
}