我通常使用以下习语来检查String是否可以转换为整数。
public boolean isInteger( String input ) {
try {
Integer.parseInt( input );
return true;
}
catch( Exception e ) {
return false;
}
}
是我的错觉,还是你觉得这有点粗俗?还有什么更好的办法吗?
看看我的回答(带有基准,基于CodingWithSpike之前的回答),看看为什么我改变了立场,接受了Jonas Klemming对这个问题的回答。我认为大多数人都会使用这个原始代码,因为它实现起来更快,也更易于维护,但是当提供非整数数据时,它就慢了几个数量级。
做了一个快速的基准测试。异常实际上并没有那么昂贵,除非您开始弹出多个方法,JVM必须做大量工作才能使执行堆栈就位。如果保持相同的方法,他们就不会表现不好。
public void RunTests()
{
String str = "1234567890";
long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
IsInt_ByException(str);
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.print("ByException: ");
System.out.println(endTime - startTime);
startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
IsInt_ByRegex(str);
endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.print("ByRegex: ");
System.out.println(endTime - startTime);
startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
IsInt_ByJonas(str);
endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.print("ByJonas: ");
System.out.println(endTime - startTime);
}
private boolean IsInt_ByException(String str)
{
try
{
Integer.parseInt(str);
return true;
}
catch(NumberFormatException nfe)
{
return false;
}
}
private boolean IsInt_ByRegex(String str)
{
return str.matches("^-?\\d+$");
}
public boolean IsInt_ByJonas(String str)
{
if (str == null) {
return false;
}
int length = str.length();
if (length == 0) {
return false;
}
int i = 0;
if (str.charAt(0) == '-') {
if (length == 1) {
return false;
}
i = 1;
}
for (; i < length; i++) {
char c = str.charAt(i);
if (c <= '/' || c >= ':') {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
输出:
ByException: 31
ByRegex: 453(注意:每次都重新编译模式)
ByJonas: 16
我也同意Jonas K的解决方案是最稳健的。看起来他赢了:)
我相信遇到异常的风险为零,因为正如你在下面看到的,你总是安全地将int解析为String,而不是相反。
So:
检查字符串中的每个字符槽是否至少匹配
人物之一{“0”、“1”、“2”、“3”、“4”、“5”、“6”、“7”、“8”,“9”}。
如果(aString。substring (j, + 1) .equals (String.valueOf(我)))
你把你在上面的槽中遇到的所有时间加起来
字符。
数字+ +;
最后检查遇到整数的次数是否为
Characters等于给定字符串的长度。
if(digits == aString.length())
在实践中我们有:
String aString = "1234224245";
int digits = 0;//count how many digits you encountered
for(int j=0;j<aString.length();j++){
for(int i=0;i<=9;i++){
if(aString.substring(j, j+1).equals(String.valueOf(i)))
digits++;
}
}
if(digits == aString.length()){
System.out.println("It's an integer!!");
}
else{
System.out.println("It's not an integer!!");
}
String anotherString = "1234f22a4245";
int anotherDigits = 0;//count how many digits you encountered
for(int j=0;j<anotherString.length();j++){
for(int i=0;i<=9;i++){
if(anotherString.substring(j, j+1).equals(String.valueOf(i)))
anotherDigits++;
}
}
if(anotherDigits == anotherString.length()){
System.out.println("It's an integer!!");
}
else{
System.out.println("It's not an integer!!");
}
结果是:
是个整数!!
不是整数!!
类似地,您可以验证String是float还是double,但在这些情况下,您只需要遇到一个。(dot)在字符串中当然检查digits是否== (aString.length()-1)
同样,这里遇到解析异常的风险为零,但是如果您计划解析一个已知包含数字的字符串(比如int数据类型),则必须首先检查它是否适合该数据类型。否则你必须施放它。
我希望我能帮上忙
I recently (today) needed to figure out a quick way to do this and of course I was going to use the exception approach for ease when the monkey on the shoulder (conscience) woke up so it took me down this old familiar rabbit hole; no exceptions are not that much more expensive in fact sometimes exceptions are faster (old AIX multiprocessor systems) but regardless it’s to elegant so I did something that the younger me never did and to my amazement nobody here did either (apologize if someone did and I missed it I honestly did not find) : so what did I think we all missed; taking a look at how the JRE implemented it, yes they threw an exception but we can always skip that part.
10年前年轻的我可能会觉得这有失他的身份,但话又说回来,他是一个大嘴巴的炫耀者,性情不好,有一种神的情结,所以就是这样。
我把这些放在这里,是为了方便将来来这里的人。以下是我的发现:
public static int parseInt(String s, int radix) throws NumberFormatException
{
/*
* WARNING: This method may be invoked early during VM initialization
* before IntegerCache is initialized. Care must be taken to not use
* the valueOf method.
*/
if (s == null) {
throw new NumberFormatException("null");
}
if (radix < Character.MIN_RADIX) {
throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
" less than Character.MIN_RADIX");
}
if (radix > Character.MAX_RADIX) {
throw new NumberFormatException("radix " + radix +
" greater than Character.MAX_RADIX");
}
int result = 0;
boolean negative = false;
int i = 0, len = s.length();
int limit = -Integer.MAX_VALUE;
int multmin;
int digit;
if (len > 0) {
char firstChar = s.charAt(0);
if (firstChar < '0') { // Possible leading "+" or "-"
if (firstChar == '-') {
negative = true;
limit = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
} else if (firstChar != '+')
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
if (len == 1) // Cannot have lone "+" or "-"
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
i++;
}
multmin = limit / radix;
while (i < len) {
// Accumulating negatively avoids surprises near MAX_VALUE
digit = Character.digit(s.charAt(i++),radix);
if (digit < 0) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
if (result < multmin) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
result *= radix;
if (result < limit + digit) {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
result -= digit;
}
} else {
throw NumberFormatException.forInputString(s);
}
return negative ? result : -result;
}