我必须结合以上文章中的几个想法，并添加文件锁定检查，让它为我工作:

FileSystemWatcher fileSystemWatcher;

private void DirectoryWatcher_Start()
{
    FileSystemWatcher fileSystemWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher
    {
        Path = @"c:\mypath",
        NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite,
        Filter = "*.*",
        EnableRaisingEvents = true
    };

    fileSystemWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(DirectoryWatcher_OnChanged);
}

private static void WaitUntilFileIsUnlocked(String fullPath, Action<String> callback, FileAccess fileAccess = FileAccess.Read, Int32 timeoutMS = 10000)
{
    Int32 waitMS = 250;
    Int32 currentMS = 0;
    FileInfo file = new FileInfo(fullPath);
    FileStream stream = null;
    do
    {
        try
        {
            stream = file.Open(FileMode.Open, fileAccess, FileShare.None);
            stream.Close();
            callback(fullPath);
            return;
        }
        catch (IOException)
        {
        }
        finally
        {
            if (stream != null)
                stream.Dispose();
        }
        Thread.Sleep(waitMS);
        currentMS += waitMS;
    } while (currentMS < timeoutMS);
}    

private static Dictionary<String, DateTime> DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache = new Dictionary<String, DateTime>();

private void DirectoryWatcher_OnChanged(Object source, FileSystemEventArgs ev)
{
    try
    {
        lock (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache)
        {
            DateTime lastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime(ev.FullPath);
            if (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache.ContainsKey(ev.FullPath))
            {
                if (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache[ev.FullPath].AddMilliseconds(500) >= lastWriteTime)
                    return;     // file was already handled
            }

            DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache[ev.FullPath] = lastWriteTime;
        }

        Task.Run(() => WaitUntilFileIsUnlocked(ev.FullPath, fullPath =>
        {
            // do the job with fullPath...
        }));

    }
    catch (Exception e)
    {
        // handle exception
    }
}

这里有一个你可以尝试的新解决方案。很适合我。在已更改事件的事件处理程序中，以编程方式从设计器输出中删除处理程序(如果需要的话)，然后以编程方式将处理程序添加回来。例子:

public void fileSystemWatcher1_Changed( object sender, System.IO.FileSystemEventArgs e )
    {            
        fileSystemWatcher1.Changed -= new System.IO.FileSystemEventHandler( fileSystemWatcher1_Changed );
        MessageBox.Show( "File has been uploaded to destination", "Success!" );
        fileSystemWatcher1.Changed += new System.IO.FileSystemEventHandler( fileSystemWatcher1_Changed );
    }

如果你注册了OnChanged事件，那么在修改之前删除被监视的文件可能会起作用，只要你只需要监视OnChange事件。

我们可以这么简单。这对我很管用。

private static void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e) 
{
    if (File.GetAttributes(e.FullPath) == FileAttributes.Directory)
        return;
    double timeSpan = DateTime.Now.Subtract(File.GetLastWriteTime(e.FullPath)).TotalSeconds;
    if (timeSpan > 1)
        return;
    Console.WriteLine($"Changed: {e.FullPath}");
}

以下是我的方法:

// Consider having a List<String> named _changedFiles

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    lock (_changedFiles)
    {
        if (_changedFiles.Contains(e.FullPath))
        {
            return;
        }
        _changedFiles.Add(e.FullPath);
    }

    // do your stuff

    System.Timers.Timer timer = new Timer(1000) { AutoReset = false };
    timer.Elapsed += (timerElapsedSender, timerElapsedArgs) =>
    {
        lock (_changedFiles)
        {
            _changedFiles.Remove(e.FullPath);
        }
    };
   timer.Start();
}

这是我在一个项目中用来解决这个问题的解决方案，在该项目中，我将文件作为附件发送到邮件中。 它可以很容易地避免两次触发事件，即使是一个较小的定时器间隔，但在我的情况下，1000是可以的，因为我更喜欢错过一些变化，而不是每秒用> 1条消息淹没邮箱。 至少在同时更改多个文件的情况下，它可以正常工作。

Another solution I've thought of would be to replace the list with a dictionary mapping files to their respective MD5, so you wouldn't have to choose an arbitrary interval since you wouldn't have to delete the entry but update its value, and cancel your stuff if it hasn't changed. It has the downside of having a Dictionary growing in memory as files are monitored and eating more and more memory, but I've read somewhere that the amount of files monitored depends on the FSW's internal buffer, so maybe not that critical. Dunno how MD5 computing time would affect your code's performances either, careful =\

一直在寻找答案，但我想到了一个肮脏的解决方案。因为我的事件触发了两次，所以第二个动作什么也不做。

       $count = 1
       $action = { 
            if($count -eq 1){                  
                #DO SOMETHING
                $count = 2 
            }else{
                $count = 1
            }
        }