我只想对最后一个事件做出反应，以防万一，也对linux文件更改，它似乎在第一次调用时文件是空的，然后在下一个调用时再次填充，不介意浪费一些时间，以防操作系统决定做一些文件/属性更改。

我在这里使用。net async来帮助我做线程。

    private static int _fileSystemWatcherCounts;
    private async void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        // Filter several calls in short period of time
        Interlocked.Increment(ref _fileSystemWatcherCounts);
        await Task.Delay(100);
        if (Interlocked.Decrement(ref _fileSystemWatcherCounts) == 0)
            DoYourWork();
    }

恐怕这是FileSystemWatcher类的一个众所周知的错误/特性。这是来自类的文档:

You may notice in certain situations that a single creation event generates multiple Created events that are handled by your component. For example, if you use a FileSystemWatcher component to monitor the creation of new files in a directory, and then test it by using Notepad to create a file, you may see two Created events generated even though only a single file was created. This is because Notepad performs multiple file system actions during the writing process. Notepad writes to the disk in batches that create the content of the file and then the file attributes. Other applications may perform in the same manner. Because FileSystemWatcher monitors the operating system activities, all events that these applications fire will be picked up.

现在这段文本是关于Created事件的，但同样的事情也适用于其他文件事件。在一些应用程序中，您可能能够通过使用NotifyFilter属性来解决这个问题，但我的经验是，有时您还必须进行一些手动重复过滤(hacks)。

前段时间我书签了一个页面，里面有一些FileSystemWatcher技巧。你可能会想去看看。

这个解决方案适用于我的生产应用程序:

环境:

VB。Net Framework 4.5.2

手动设置对象属性:NotifyFilter = Size

然后使用下面的代码:

Public Class main
    Dim CalledOnce = False
    Private Sub FileSystemWatcher1_Changed(sender As Object, e As IO.FileSystemEventArgs) Handles FileSystemWatcher1.Changed
            If (CalledOnce = False) Then
                CalledOnce = True
                If (e.ChangeType = 4) Then
                    ' Do task...
                CalledOnce = False
            End If
        End Sub
End Sub

FileReadTime = DateTime.Now;

private void File_Changed(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{            
    var lastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime(e.FullPath);
    if (lastWriteTime.Subtract(FileReadTime).Ticks > 0)
    {
        // code
        FileReadTime = DateTime.Now;
    }
}

事件如果没有问，这是一个遗憾，没有现成的解决方案样本f#。 要解决这个问题，这里有我的方法，因为我可以，而且f#是一种很棒的。net语言。

使用FSharp.Control.Reactive包过滤掉重复的事件，它只是响应式扩展的f#包装器。所有这些都可以针对全框架或netstandard2.0:

let createWatcher path filter () =
    new FileSystemWatcher(
        Path = path,
        Filter = filter,
        EnableRaisingEvents = true,
        SynchronizingObject = null // not needed for console applications
    )

let createSources (fsWatcher: FileSystemWatcher) =
    // use here needed events only. 
    // convert `Error` and `Renamed` events to be merded
    [| fsWatcher.Changed :> IObservable<_>
       fsWatcher.Deleted :> IObservable<_>
       fsWatcher.Created :> IObservable<_>
       //fsWatcher.Renamed |> Observable.map renamedToNeeded
       //fsWatcher.Error   |> Observable.map errorToNeeded
    |] |> Observable.mergeArray

let handle (e: FileSystemEventArgs) =
    printfn "handle %A event '%s' '%s' " e.ChangeType e.Name e.FullPath 

let watch path filter throttleTime =
    // disposes watcher if observer subscription is disposed
    Observable.using (createWatcher path filter) createSources
    // filter out multiple equal events
    |> Observable.distinctUntilChanged
    // filter out multiple Changed
    |> Observable.throttle throttleTime
    |> Observable.subscribe handle

[<EntryPoint>]
let main _args =
    let path = @"C:\Temp\WatchDir"
    let filter = "*.zip"
    let throttleTime = TimeSpan.FromSeconds 10.
    use _subscription = watch path filter throttleTime
    System.Console.ReadKey() |> ignore
    0 // return an integer exit code

我改变了监视目录中的文件的方式。我没有使用FileSystemWatcher，而是在另一个线程上轮询位置，然后查看文件的LastWriteTime。

DateTime lastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime(someFilePath);

使用这些信息并保持文件路径的索引和最近的写入时间，我可以确定在特定位置已更改或已创建的文件。这使我摆脱了FileSystemWatcher的奇怪之处。主要的缺点是您需要一个数据结构来存储LastWriteTime和对文件的引用，但是它是可靠且易于实现的。