我有一个应用程序,我正在寻找一个文本文件,如果对文件做了任何更改,我使用OnChanged事件处理程序来处理事件。我正在使用NotifyFilters。LastWriteTime,但是事件仍然被触发两次。这是代码。

public void Initialize()
{
   FileSystemWatcher _fileWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
  _fileWatcher.Path = "C:\\Folder";
  _fileWatcher.NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite;
  _fileWatcher.Filter = "Version.txt";
  _fileWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
  _fileWatcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
}

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
   .......
}

在我的情况下,OnChanged被调用两次,当我改变文本文件version.txt并保存它。


当前回答

我只想对最后一个事件做出反应,以防万一,也对linux文件更改,它似乎在第一次调用时文件是空的,然后在下一个调用时再次填充,不介意浪费一些时间,以防操作系统决定做一些文件/属性更改。

我在这里使用。net async来帮助我做线程。

    private static int _fileSystemWatcherCounts;
    private async void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        // Filter several calls in short period of time
        Interlocked.Increment(ref _fileSystemWatcherCounts);
        await Task.Delay(100);
        if (Interlocked.Decrement(ref _fileSystemWatcherCounts) == 0)
            DoYourWork();
    }

其他回答

我必须结合以上文章中的几个想法,并添加文件锁定检查,让它为我工作:

FileSystemWatcher fileSystemWatcher;

private void DirectoryWatcher_Start()
{
    FileSystemWatcher fileSystemWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher
    {
        Path = @"c:\mypath",
        NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite,
        Filter = "*.*",
        EnableRaisingEvents = true
    };

    fileSystemWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(DirectoryWatcher_OnChanged);
}

private static void WaitUntilFileIsUnlocked(String fullPath, Action<String> callback, FileAccess fileAccess = FileAccess.Read, Int32 timeoutMS = 10000)
{
    Int32 waitMS = 250;
    Int32 currentMS = 0;
    FileInfo file = new FileInfo(fullPath);
    FileStream stream = null;
    do
    {
        try
        {
            stream = file.Open(FileMode.Open, fileAccess, FileShare.None);
            stream.Close();
            callback(fullPath);
            return;
        }
        catch (IOException)
        {
        }
        finally
        {
            if (stream != null)
                stream.Dispose();
        }
        Thread.Sleep(waitMS);
        currentMS += waitMS;
    } while (currentMS < timeoutMS);
}    

private static Dictionary<String, DateTime> DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache = new Dictionary<String, DateTime>();

private void DirectoryWatcher_OnChanged(Object source, FileSystemEventArgs ev)
{
    try
    {
        lock (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache)
        {
            DateTime lastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime(ev.FullPath);
            if (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache.ContainsKey(ev.FullPath))
            {
                if (DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache[ev.FullPath].AddMilliseconds(500) >= lastWriteTime)
                    return;     // file was already handled
            }

            DirectoryWatcher_fileLastWriteTimeCache[ev.FullPath] = lastWriteTime;
        }

        Task.Run(() => WaitUntilFileIsUnlocked(ev.FullPath, fullPath =>
        {
            // do the job with fullPath...
        }));

    }
    catch (Exception e)
    {
        // handle exception
    }
}

这是另一种方法。现在,除了最后一个事件以外,所有事件都被抑制,而不是传播一系列事件中的第一个事件并抑制所有接下来的事件。我认为可以从这种方法中受益的场景更常见。

要做到这一点,我们必须使用滑动延迟。每个传入事件都会取消触发前一个事件的计时器,并重新启动计时器。这开启了一种可能性,即一系列永无止境的事件将永远推迟传播。为了简单起见,在下面的扩展方法中没有针对这种异常情况的规定。

public static class FileSystemWatcherExtensions
{
    public static IDisposable OnAnyEvent(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        WatcherChangeTypes changeTypes, FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
    {
        var cancellations = new Dictionary<string, CancellationTokenSource>(
            StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
        var locker = new object();
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Created))
            source.Created += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted))
            source.Deleted += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Changed))
            source.Changed += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Renamed))
            source.Renamed += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        return new Disposable(() =>
        {
            source.Created -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Deleted -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Changed -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Renamed -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        });

        async void FileSystemWatcher_Event(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
        {
            var key = e.FullPath;
            var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
            lock (locker)
            {
                if (cancellations.TryGetValue(key, out var existing))
                {
                    existing.Cancel();
                }
                cancellations[key] = cts;
            }
            try
            {
                await Task.Delay(delay, cts.Token);
                // Omitting ConfigureAwait(false) is intentional here.
                // Continuing in the captured context is desirable.
            }
            catch (TaskCanceledException)
            {
                return;
            }
            lock (locker)
            {
                if (cancellations.TryGetValue(key, out var existing)
                    && existing == cts)
                {
                    cancellations.Remove(key);
                }
            }
            cts.Dispose();
            handler(sender, e);
        }
    }

    public static IDisposable OnAllEvents(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.All, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnCreated(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Created, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnDeleted(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnChanged(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Changed, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnRenamed(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Renamed, handler, delay);

    private struct Disposable : IDisposable
    {
        private readonly Action _action;
        internal Disposable(Action action) => _action = action;
        public void Dispose() => _action?.Invoke();
    }
}

使用的例子:

myWatcher.OnAnyEvent(WatcherChangeTypes.Created | WatcherChangeTypes.Changed,
    MyFileSystemWatcher_Event, 100);

这一行将两个事件(Created和Changed)的订阅组合在一起。所以它大致相当于这些:

myWatcher.Created += MyFileSystemWatcher_Event;
myWatcher.Changed += MyFileSystemWatcher_Event;

不同之处在于,这两个事件被视为单一类型的事件,在这些事件快速连续的情况下,只有最后一个事件将被传播。例如,如果一个Created事件后面跟着两个Changed事件,并且这三个事件之间的时间间隔不超过100 msec,则只有第二个Changed事件将通过调用MyFileSystemWatcher_Event处理程序来传播,而前一个事件将被丢弃。

我可以通过添加一个函数来检查缓冲区数组中的重复项来做到这一点。

然后使用计时器在数组X时间内未被修改后执行该操作: -每次有东西写入缓冲区时重置计时器 —对tick执行动作

这还捕获了另一种复制类型。如果修改文件夹内的文件,该文件夹也会引发Change事件。

Function is_duplicate(str1 As String) As Boolean
    If lb_actions_list.Items.Count = 0 Then
        Return False
    Else
        Dim compStr As String = lb_actions_list.Items(lb_actions_list.Items.Count - 1).ToString
        compStr = compStr.Substring(compStr.IndexOf("-") + 1).Trim

        If compStr <> str1 AndAlso compStr.parentDir <> str1 & "\" Then
            Return False
        Else
            Return True
        End If
    End If
End Function

Public Module extentions
<Extension()>
Public Function parentDir(ByVal aString As String) As String
    Return aString.Substring(0, CInt(InStrRev(aString, "\", aString.Length - 1)))
End Function
End Module

我认为解决这个问题的最佳方案是使用响应式扩展 当你将事件转换为可观察对象时,你可以添加Throttling(..)(最初称为Debounce(..))

这里是示例代码

        var templatesWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher(settingsSnapshot.Value.TemplatesDirectory)
        {
            NotifyFilter = NotifyFilters.LastWrite,
            IncludeSubdirectories = true
        };

        templatesWatcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;

        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventHandler, FileSystemEventArgs>(
                addHandler => templatesWatcher.Changed += addHandler,
                removeHandler => templatesWatcher.Changed -= removeHandler)
            .Throttle(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5))
            .Subscribe(args =>
            {
                _logger.LogInformation($"Template file {args.EventArgs.Name} has changed");
                //TODO do something
            });

恐怕这是FileSystemWatcher类的一个众所周知的错误/特性。这是来自类的文档:

You may notice in certain situations that a single creation event generates multiple Created events that are handled by your component. For example, if you use a FileSystemWatcher component to monitor the creation of new files in a directory, and then test it by using Notepad to create a file, you may see two Created events generated even though only a single file was created. This is because Notepad performs multiple file system actions during the writing process. Notepad writes to the disk in batches that create the content of the file and then the file attributes. Other applications may perform in the same manner. Because FileSystemWatcher monitors the operating system activities, all events that these applications fire will be picked up.

现在这段文本是关于Created事件的,但同样的事情也适用于其他文件事件。在一些应用程序中,您可能能够通过使用NotifyFilter属性来解决这个问题,但我的经验是,有时您还必须进行一些手动重复过滤(hacks)。

前段时间我书签了一个页面,里面有一些FileSystemWatcher技巧。你可能会想去看看。