在Android源代码中查找导致此问题的原因，给出FragmentManagerImpl类(Activity中可用的实例)中的标记mStateSaved的值为true。当Activity#onSaveInstanceState调用后堆栈被保存(saveAllState)时，它被设置为true。 之后，来自ActivityThread的调用不会使用FragmentManagerImpl#noteStateNotSaved()和dispatch()中的可用重置方法重置该标志。

在我看来，有一些可用的修复，这取决于你的应用程序正在做什么和使用:

的好方法

首先，我要为Alex Lockwood的文章做广告。然后，根据我目前所做的:

For fragments and activities that don't need to keep any state information, call commitAllowStateLoss. Taken from documentation: Allows the commit to be executed after an activity's state is saved. This is dangerous because the commit can be lost if the activity needs to later be restored from its state, so this should only be used for cases where it is okay for the UI state to change unexpectedly on the user`. I guess this is alright to use if the fragment is showing read-only information. Or even if they do show editable info, use the callbacks methods to retain the edited info. Just after the transaction is commit (you just called commit()), make a call to FragmentManager.executePendingTransactions().

不推荐的方法:

As Ovidiu Latcu mentioned above, don't call super.onSaveInstanceState(). But this means you will lose the whole state of your activity along with fragments state. Override onBackPressed and in there call only finish(). This should be OK if you application doesn't use Fragments API; as in super.onBackPressed there is a call to FragmentManager#popBackStackImmediate(). If you are using both Fragments API and the state of your activity is important/vital, then you could try to call using reflection API FragmentManagerImpl#noteStateNotSaved(). But this is a hack, or one could say it's a workaround. I don't like it, but in my case it's quite acceptable since I have a code from a legacy app that uses deprecated code (TabActivity and implicitly LocalActivityManager).

下面是使用反射的代码:

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
    invokeFragmentManagerNoteStateNotSaved();
}

@SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
private void invokeFragmentManagerNoteStateNotSaved() {
    /**
     * For post-Honeycomb devices
     */
    if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT < 11) {
        return;
    }
    try {
        Class cls = getClass();
        do {
            cls = cls.getSuperclass();
        } while (!"Activity".equals(cls.getSimpleName()));
        Field fragmentMgrField = cls.getDeclaredField("mFragments");
        fragmentMgrField.setAccessible(true);

        Object fragmentMgr = fragmentMgrField.get(this);
        cls = fragmentMgr.getClass();

        Method noteStateNotSavedMethod = cls.getDeclaredMethod("noteStateNotSaved", new Class[] {});
        noteStateNotSavedMethod.invoke(fragmentMgr, new Object[] {});
        Log.d("DLOutState", "Successful call for noteStateNotSaved!!!");
    } catch (Exception ex) {
        Log.e("DLOutState", "Exception on worka FM.noteStateNotSaved", ex);
    }
}

干杯!

我也有同样的问题，经过一天的分析，所有的文章，博客和stackoverflow，我找到了一个简单的解决方案。完全不要使用savedInstanceState，这是一行代码的条件。在片段代码上:

@Override
public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
    super.onCreate(null);
    .....

解决这个问题的另一种生命周期方法是使用kotlin最新发布的lifecycle-ktx。

lifecycleScope.launchWhenResumed {
    // your code with fragment or dialogfragment
}

闭包将在恢复状态后运行，因此甚至在恢复状态后调用此方法 停，等下一份简历来的时候就安全执行了。

你也可以选择喜欢

lifecycleScope.launchWhenCreated
// or
lifecycleScope.launchWhenStarted

适合你的情况。

当销毁完成时，代码将被取消。

谷歌文档链接: https://developer.android.com/kotlin/ktx#lifecycle

好吧，在尝试了以上所有的解决方案都没有成功(因为基本上我没有事务)。

在我的情况下，我使用alertdialog和ProgressDialog作为片段，有时，在旋转时，当请求FragmentManager时，错误会上升。

我找到了一个混合了许多类似帖子的变通方法:

这是一个3步解决方案，所有在你的FragmentActivity(在这种情况下，它被称为GenericActivity):

private static WeakReference<GenericActivity> activity = null; //To avoid bug for fragments: Step 1 of 3

@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState){
    super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
    //To avoid bug for fragments: Step 2 of 3
    activity = new WeakReference<GenericActivity>(this);
}

@Override
public FragmentManager getSupportFragmentManager(){
    //To avoid bug for fragments: Step 3 of 3
    if (this == activity.get()) {
        return super.getSupportFragmentManager();
    }
    return activity.get().getSupportFragmentManager();
}

在Android源代码中查找导致此问题的原因，给出FragmentManagerImpl类(Activity中可用的实例)中的标记mStateSaved的值为true。当Activity#onSaveInstanceState调用后堆栈被保存(saveAllState)时，它被设置为true。 之后，来自ActivityThread的调用不会使用FragmentManagerImpl#noteStateNotSaved()和dispatch()中的可用重置方法重置该标志。

在我看来，有一些可用的修复，这取决于你的应用程序正在做什么和使用:

的好方法

首先，我要为Alex Lockwood的文章做广告。然后，根据我目前所做的:

For fragments and activities that don't need to keep any state information, call commitAllowStateLoss. Taken from documentation: Allows the commit to be executed after an activity's state is saved. This is dangerous because the commit can be lost if the activity needs to later be restored from its state, so this should only be used for cases where it is okay for the UI state to change unexpectedly on the user`. I guess this is alright to use if the fragment is showing read-only information. Or even if they do show editable info, use the callbacks methods to retain the edited info. Just after the transaction is commit (you just called commit()), make a call to FragmentManager.executePendingTransactions().

不推荐的方法:

As Ovidiu Latcu mentioned above, don't call super.onSaveInstanceState(). But this means you will lose the whole state of your activity along with fragments state. Override onBackPressed and in there call only finish(). This should be OK if you application doesn't use Fragments API; as in super.onBackPressed there is a call to FragmentManager#popBackStackImmediate(). If you are using both Fragments API and the state of your activity is important/vital, then you could try to call using reflection API FragmentManagerImpl#noteStateNotSaved(). But this is a hack, or one could say it's a workaround. I don't like it, but in my case it's quite acceptable since I have a code from a legacy app that uses deprecated code (TabActivity and implicitly LocalActivityManager).

下面是使用反射的代码:

@Override
protected void onSaveInstanceState(Bundle outState) {
    super.onSaveInstanceState(outState);
    invokeFragmentManagerNoteStateNotSaved();
}

@SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })
private void invokeFragmentManagerNoteStateNotSaved() {
    /**
     * For post-Honeycomb devices
     */
    if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT < 11) {
        return;
    }
    try {
        Class cls = getClass();
        do {
            cls = cls.getSuperclass();
        } while (!"Activity".equals(cls.getSimpleName()));
        Field fragmentMgrField = cls.getDeclaredField("mFragments");
        fragmentMgrField.setAccessible(true);

        Object fragmentMgr = fragmentMgrField.get(this);
        cls = fragmentMgr.getClass();

        Method noteStateNotSavedMethod = cls.getDeclaredMethod("noteStateNotSaved", new Class[] {});
        noteStateNotSavedMethod.invoke(fragmentMgr, new Object[] {});
        Log.d("DLOutState", "Successful call for noteStateNotSaved!!!");
    } catch (Exception ex) {
        Log.e("DLOutState", "Exception on worka FM.noteStateNotSaved", ex);
    }
}

干杯!

谢谢@gunar，但我认为有更好的方法。

医生说:

*如果您提交的单个事务没有修改 *碎片回栈，强烈考虑使用 * {@link FragmentTransaction#commitNow()}代替。这有助于避免 *当应用程序中的其他代码未提交时，会产生不必要的副作用 *需要不同时间的事务。 ＊ * @return如果有任何待处理事务则返回true *执行。 * / executePendingTransactions();

所以使用commitNow替换:

fragmentTransaction.commit();
FragmentManager.executePendingTransactions()