尝试一下这样的东西:

function get_realpath() {

if [[ -f "$1" ]]
then
    # The file *must* exist
    if cd "$(echo "${1%/*}")" &>/dev/null
    then
        # The file *may* not be local.
        # The exception is ./file.ext
        # tTry 'cd .; cd -;' *works!*
        local tmppwd="$PWD"
        cd - &>/dev/null
    else
        # file *must* be local
        local tmppwd="$PWD"
    fi
else
    # The file *cannot* exist
    return 1 # Failure
fi

# Reassemble realpath
echo "$tmppwd"/"${1##*/}"
return 0 # Success

}

function get_dirname(){

local realpath="$(get_realpath "$1")"
if (( $? )) # True when non-zero.
then
    return $? # Failure
fi
echo "${realpath%/*}"
return 0 # Success

}

# Then from the top level:
get_dirname './script.sh'

# Or within a script:
get_dirname "$0"

# Can even test the outcome!
if (( $? )) # True when non-zero.
then
    exit 1 # Failure
fi

這些功能和相關工具是我們的產品的一部分,已為社區提供免費,可以在GitHub找到作為 realpath-lib. 它是簡單的,清潔和良好的文档(很棒的學習),純粹的Bash,並沒有依賴。

source '/path/to/realpath-lib'

get_dirname "$0"

if (( $? )) # True when non-zero.
then
    exit 1 # Failure
fi

关键部分是,我正在减少问题的范围:我禁止通过路径间接执行脚本(如 /bin/sh [脚本路径与路径组件有关])。

这可以被检测到,因为0美元将是一个相对的路径,不解决与当前文件夹有关的任何文件。我相信使用#!机制的直接执行总是导致绝对0美元,包括当脚本在路径上找到时。

我也要求在象征性链接链接链接的任何字符和字符只包含一个合理的字符子,特别是不是 \n, >, * 或?. 这对于字符逻辑来说是必要的。

#!/bin/sh
(
    path="${0}"
    while test -n "${path}"; do
        # Make sure we have at least one slash and no leading dash.
        expr "${path}" : / > /dev/null || path="./${path}"
        # Filter out bad characters in the path name.
        expr "${path}" : ".*[*?<>\\]" > /dev/null && exit 1
        # Catch embedded new-lines and non-existing (or path-relative) files.
        # $0 should always be absolute when scripts are invoked through "#!".
        test "`ls -l -d "${path}" 2> /dev/null | wc -l`" -eq 1 || exit 1
        # Change to the folder containing the file to resolve relative links.
        folder=`expr "${path}" : "\(.*/\)[^/][^/]*/*$"` || exit 1
        path=`expr "x\`ls -l -d "${path}"\`" : "[^>]* -> \(.*\)"`
        cd "${folder}"
        # If the last path was not a link then we are in the target folder.
        test -n "${path}" || pwd
    done
)

#!/usr/bin/env bash

SCRIPT_DIR=$( cd -- "$( dirname -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" )" &> /dev/null && pwd )

这是一个有用的单行,这将为您提供脚本的完整目录名称,无论它从哪里被召唤。

它将工作,只要找到脚本的路径的最后一个组成部分不是一个simlink(指南链接是OK)。如果你也想解决任何链接到脚本本身,你需要一个多线解决方案:

#!/usr/bin/env bash

SOURCE=${BASH_SOURCE[0]}
while [ -L "$SOURCE" ]; do # resolve $SOURCE until the file is no longer a symlink
  DIR=$( cd -P "$( dirname "$SOURCE" )" >/dev/null 2>&1 && pwd )
  SOURCE=$(readlink "$SOURCE")
  [[ $SOURCE != /* ]] && SOURCE=$DIR/$SOURCE # if $SOURCE was a relative symlink, we need to resolve it relative to the path where the symlink file was located
done
DIR=$( cd -P "$( dirname "$SOURCE" )" >/dev/null 2>&1 && pwd )

最后一个将与任何结合的联盟,来源,bash -c,simlinks等工作。

注意:如果您在运行此剪辑之前将CD转到另一个目录,结果可能是错误的!

此外,请注意 $CDPATH gotchas 和 stderr 输出副作用,如果用户有明智的 overridden cd 将输出转向 stderr 而不是 (包括逃避序列,如在 Mac 上呼叫 update_terminal_cwd >&2 ) 添加 >/dev/null 2>&1 在您的 cd 命令结束时,将考虑到两种可能性。

要了解它是如何工作的,试着运行这个更垂直的形式:

#!/usr/bin/env bash

SOURCE=${BASH_SOURCE[0]}
while [ -L "$SOURCE" ]; do # resolve $SOURCE until the file is no longer a symlink
  TARGET=$(readlink "$SOURCE")
  if [[ $TARGET == /* ]]; then
    echo "SOURCE '$SOURCE' is an absolute symlink to '$TARGET'"
    SOURCE=$TARGET
  else
    DIR=$( dirname "$SOURCE" )
    echo "SOURCE '$SOURCE' is a relative symlink to '$TARGET' (relative to '$DIR')"
    SOURCE=$DIR/$TARGET # if $SOURCE was a relative symlink, we need to resolve it relative to the path where the symlink file was located
  fi
done
echo "SOURCE is '$SOURCE'"
RDIR=$( dirname "$SOURCE" )
DIR=$( cd -P "$( dirname "$SOURCE" )" >/dev/null 2>&1 && pwd )
if [ "$DIR" != "$RDIR" ]; then
  echo "DIR '$RDIR' resolves to '$DIR'"
fi
echo "DIR is '$DIR'"

它将打印一些类似:

SOURCE './scriptdir.sh' is a relative symlink to 'sym2/scriptdir.sh' (relative to '.')
SOURCE is './sym2/scriptdir.sh'
DIR './sym2' resolves to '/home/ubuntu/dotfiles/fo fo/real/real1/real2'
DIR is '/home/ubuntu/dotfiles/fo fo/real/real1/real2'

在我看来,最合适的解决方案是:

"$( cd "$( echo "${BASH_SOURCE[0]%/*}" )"; pwd )"

使用 dirname、 readlink 和 basename 最终会导致兼容性问题,所以如果可能的话最好避免。

使用“0”字母:

#!/usr/bin/env bash

echo "The script you are running has basename $( basename -- "$0"; ), dirname $( dirname -- "$0"; )";
echo "The present working directory is $( pwd; )";

使用 pwd 单独不会工作,如果您不从它包含的目录中运行脚本。

[matt@server1 ~]$ pwd
/home/matt
[matt@server1 ~]$ ./test2.sh
The script you are running has basename test2.sh, dirname .
The present working directory is /home/matt
[matt@server1 ~]$ cd /tmp
[matt@server1 tmp]$ ~/test2.sh
The script you are running has basename test2.sh, dirname /home/matt
The present working directory is /tmp

这些其他答案中没有一个为Finder在OS X中启动的Bash脚本工作。

SCRIPT_LOC="`ps -p $$ | sed /PID/d | sed s:.*/Network/:/Network/: |
sed s:.*/Volumes/:/Volumes/:`"

它不太好,但它完成了工作。