我如何找到一个Bash脚本位于该脚本内部的目录的路径?
我想用Bash脚本作为另一个应用程序的启动器,我想将工作目录更改为Bash脚本所在的目录,所以我可以在该目录中的文件上运行,如下:
$ ./application
我如何找到一个Bash脚本位于该脚本内部的目录的路径?
我想用Bash脚本作为另一个应用程序的启动器,我想将工作目录更改为Bash脚本所在的目录,所以我可以在该目录中的文件上运行,如下:
$ ./application
当前回答
查看下面的测试与奇怪的目录名称。
要将工作目录更改为Bash脚本的位置,您应该尝试这个简单的,测试和验证的Shellcheck解决方案:
#!/bin/bash --
cd "$(dirname "${0}")"/. || exit 2
测试:
$ ls
application
$ mkdir "$(printf "\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\10\11\12\13\14\15\16\17\20\21\22\23\24\25\26\27\30\31\32\33\34\35\36\37\40\41\42\43\44\45\46\47testdir" "")"
$ mv application *testdir
$ ln -s *testdir "$(printf "\1\2\3\4\5\6\7\10\11\12\13\14\15\16\17\20\21\22\23\24\25\26\27\30\31\32\33\34\35\36\37\40\41\42\43\44\45\46\47symlink" "")"
$ ls -lb
total 4
lrwxrwxrwx 1 jay stacko 46 Mar 30 20:44 \001\002\003\004\005\006\a\b\t\n\v\f\r\016\017\020\021\022\023\024\025\026\027\030\031\032\033\034\035\036\037\ !"#$%&'symlink -> \001\002\003\004\005\006\a\b\t\n\v\f\r\016\017\020\021\022\023\024\025\026\027\030\031\032\033\034\035\036\037\ !"#$%&'testdir
drwxr-xr-x 2 jay stacko 4096 Mar 30 20:44 \001\002\003\004\005\006\a\b\t\n\v\f\r\016\017\020\021\022\023\024\025\026\027\030\031\032\033\034\035\036\037\ !"#$%&'testdir
$ *testdir/application && printf "SUCCESS\n" ""
SUCCESS
$ *symlink/application && printf "SUCCESS\n" ""
SUCCESS
其他回答
使用阅读链接的组合来编码名称(如果是同链接,则将其返回来源的奖金)并提取目录名称:
script="`readlink -f "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"`"
dir="`dirname "$script"`"
如果你的Bash脚本是一个同链接,那么这就是如何做到这一点:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
dirn="$(dirname "$0")"
rl="$(readlink "$0")";
exec_dir="$(dirname $(dirname "$rl"))";
my_path="$dirn/$exec_dir";
X="$(cd $(dirname ${my_path}) && pwd)/$(basename ${my_path})"
X 是包含您的 Bash 脚本的目录(原始文件,而不是同链接)。我向上帝发誓这项工作,这是我唯一知道如何正确地做到这一点。
这是我唯一能以可靠的方式说的话:
SCRIPT_DIR=$(dirname $(cd "$(dirname "$BASH_SOURCE")"; pwd))
$0 不是一个可靠的方式来获得当前的脚本路径. 例如,这是我的.xprofile:
#!/bin/bash
echo "$0 $1 $2"
echo "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"
# $dir/my_script.sh &
cd /tmp && ~/.xprofile && 来源 ~/.xprofile
/home/puchuu/.xprofile
/home/puchuu/.xprofile
-bash
/home/puchuu/.xprofile
因此,请使用 BASH_SURCE 代替。
总结:
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"
# OR, if you do NOT need it to work for **sourced** scripts too:
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "$0")"
# OR, depending on which path you want, in case of nested `source` calls
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")"
# OR, add `-s` to NOT expand symlinks in the path:
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"
SCRIPT_DIRECTORY="$(dirname "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"
SCRIPT_FILENAME="$(basename "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"
细节:
在很多情况下,所有你需要获得的是你刚刚打电话的脚本的完整路径. 这可以很容易地通过 realpath 实现. 请注意, realpath 是 GNU 核心工具的一部分. 如果你没有它已经安装(它是默认的在 Ubuntu 上),你可以安装它与 sudo apt 更新 && sudo apt 安装核心工具。
#!/bin/bash
# A. Obtain the full path, and expand (walk down) symbolic links
# A.1. `"$0"` works only if the file is **run**, but NOT if it is **sourced**.
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "$0")"
# A.2. `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` works whether the file is sourced OR run, and even
# if the script is called from within another bash function!
# NB: if `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` doesn't give you quite what you want, use
# `"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"` instead in order to get the first element from the array.
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"
# B.1. `"$0"` works only if the file is **run**, but NOT if it is **sourced**.
# FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT_KEEP_SYMLINKS="$(realpath -s "$0")"
# B.2. `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` works whether the file is sourced OR run, and even
# if the script is called from within another bash function!
# NB: if `"${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}"` doesn't give you quite what you want, use
# `"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}"` instead in order to get the first element from the array.
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT_KEEP_SYMLINKS="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"
# You can then also get the full path to the directory, and the base
# filename, like this:
SCRIPT_DIRECTORY="$(dirname "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"
SCRIPT_FILENAME="$(basename "$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT")"
# Now print it all out
echo "FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT = \"$FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT\""
echo "SCRIPT_DIRECTORY = \"$SCRIPT_DIRECTORY\""
echo "SCRIPT_FILENAME = \"$SCRIPT_FILENAME\""
如果您在脚本中使用“$0”而不是“${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}”,则在运行脚本时,您将获得相同的输出,而不是在提取脚本时,您将获得此不需要的输出:
~/GS/dev/eRCaGuy_hello_world/bash$ . get_script_path.sh
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT = "/bin/bash"
SCRIPT_DIRECTORY = "/bin"
SCRIPT_FILENAME = "bash"
路径与路径之间的区别:
请注意,直路也成功地走下象征性链接来确定并指向他们的目标,而不是指向象征性链接。 如果你不想要这种行为(有时我不),然后添加到上面的直路命令,使该线看起来像这样:
# Obtain the full path, but do NOT expand (walk down) symbolic links; in
# other words: **keep** the symlinks as part of the path!
FULL_PATH_TO_SCRIPT="$(realpath -s "${BASH_SOURCE[-1]}")"
参考:
[我的答案] Unix 和 Linux:确定路径到源头 Shell 脚本