我如何找到一个Bash脚本位于该脚本内部的目录的路径?

我想用Bash脚本作为另一个应用程序的启动器,我想将工作目录更改为Bash脚本所在的目录,所以我可以在该目录中的文件上运行,如下:

$ ./application

当前回答

我已经比较了许多答案,并出现了一些更紧凑的解决方案. 这些似乎处理所有疯狂的边缘案例,从你最喜欢的组合:

绝对路径或相对路径 文件和目录 软链接 作为脚本, bash 脚本, bash -c 脚本, 源脚本, 或. 脚本 空间, 标签, 新闻, Unicode, 等 在目录和 / 或 文件名 Filenames 从一个 hyphen

如果您正在运行从Linux,似乎使用proc操作是找到目前运行脚本的完全解决源的最佳解决方案(在互动会议中,链接点到相应的 /dev/pts/X):

resolved="$(readlink /proc/$$/fd/255 && echo X)" && resolved="${resolved%$'\nX'}"

absolute_path=$(readlink -e -- "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" && echo x) && absolute_path=${absolute_path%?x}
dir=$(dirname -- "$absolute_path" && echo x) && dir=${dir%?x}
file=$(basename -- "$absolute_path" && echo x) && file=${file%?x}

ls -l -- "$dir/$file"
printf '$absolute_path: "%s"\n' "$absolute_path"

其他回答

我相信我得到了这个一个,我迟到了派对,但我认为有些人会欣赏它在这里,如果他们通过这个条纹。

#!/bin/sh # dash bash ksh # !zsh (issues). G. Nixon, 12/2013. Public domain.

## 'linkread' or 'fullpath' or (you choose) is a little tool to recursively
## dereference symbolic links (ala 'readlink') until the originating file
## is found. This is effectively the same function provided in stdlib.h as
## 'realpath' and on the command line in GNU 'readlink -f'.

## Neither of these tools, however, are particularly accessible on the many
## systems that do not have the GNU implementation of readlink, nor ship
## with a system compiler (not to mention the requisite knowledge of C).

## This script is written with portability and (to the extent possible, speed)
## in mind, hence the use of printf for echo and case statements where they
## can be substituded for test, though I've had to scale back a bit on that.

## It is (to the best of my knowledge) written in standard POSIX shell, and
## has been tested with bash-as-bin-sh, dash, and ksh93. zsh seems to have
## issues with it, though I'm not sure why; so probably best to avoid for now.

## Particularly useful (in fact, the reason I wrote this) is the fact that
## it can be used within a shell script to find the path of the script itself.
## (I am sure the shell knows this already; but most likely for the sake of
## security it is not made readily available. The implementation of "$0"
## specificies that the $0 must be the location of **last** symbolic link in
## a chain, or wherever it resides in the path.) This can be used for some
## ...interesting things, like self-duplicating and self-modifiying scripts.

## Currently supported are three errors: whether the file specified exists
## (ala ENOENT), whether its target exists/is accessible; and the special
## case of when a sybolic link references itself "foo -> foo": a common error
## for beginners, since 'ln' does not produce an error if the order of link
## and target are reversed on the command line. (See POSIX signal ELOOP.)

## It would probably be rather simple to write to use this as a basis for
## a pure shell implementation of the 'symlinks' util included with Linux.

## As an aside, the amount of code below **completely** belies the amount
## effort it took to get this right -- but I guess that's coding for you.

##===-------------------------------------------------------------------===##

for argv; do :; done # Last parameter on command line, for options parsing.

## Error messages. Use functions so that we can sub in when the error occurs.

recurses(){ printf "Self-referential:\n\t$argv ->\n\t$argv\n" ;}
dangling(){ printf "Broken symlink:\n\t$argv ->\n\t"$(readlink "$argv")"\n" ;}
errnoent(){ printf "No such file: "$@"\n" ;} # Borrow a horrible signal name.

# Probably best not to install as 'pathfull', if you can avoid it.

pathfull(){ cd "$(dirname "$@")"; link="$(readlink "$(basename "$@")")"

## 'test and 'ls' report different status for bad symlinks, so we use this.

 if [ ! -e "$@" ]; then if $(ls -d "$@" 2>/dev/null) 2>/dev/null;  then
    errnoent 1>&2; exit 1; elif [ ! -e "$@" -a "$link" = "$@" ];   then
    recurses 1>&2; exit 1; elif [ ! -e "$@" ] && [ ! -z "$link" ]; then
    dangling 1>&2; exit 1; fi
 fi

## Not a link, but there might be one in the path, so 'cd' and 'pwd'.

 if [ -z "$link" ]; then if [ "$(dirname "$@" | cut -c1)" = '/' ]; then
   printf "$@\n"; exit 0; else printf "$(pwd)/$(basename "$@")\n"; fi; exit 0
 fi

## Walk the symlinks back to the origin. Calls itself recursivly as needed.

 while [ "$link" ]; do
   cd "$(dirname "$link")"; newlink="$(readlink "$(basename "$link")")"
   case "$newlink" in
    "$link") dangling 1>&2 && exit 1                                       ;;
         '') printf "$(pwd)/$(basename "$link")\n"; exit 0                 ;;
          *) link="$newlink" && pathfull "$link"                           ;;
   esac
 done
 printf "$(pwd)/$(basename "$newlink")\n"
}

## Demo. Install somewhere deep in the filesystem, then symlink somewhere 
## else, symlink again (maybe with a different name) elsewhere, and link
## back into the directory you started in (or something.) The absolute path
## of the script will always be reported in the usage, along with "$0".

if [ -z "$argv" ]; then scriptname="$(pathfull "$0")"

# Yay ANSI l33t codes! Fancy.
 printf "\n\033[3mfrom/as: \033[4m$0\033[0m\n\n\033[1mUSAGE:\033[0m   "
 printf "\033[4m$scriptname\033[24m [ link | file | dir ]\n\n         "
 printf "Recursive readlink for the authoritative file, symlink after "
 printf "symlink.\n\n\n         \033[4m$scriptname\033[24m\n\n        "
 printf " From within an invocation of a script, locate the script's "
 printf "own file\n         (no matter where it has been linked or "
 printf "from where it is being called).\n\n"

else pathfull "$@"
fi

没有<unk>(除了<unk>)和可以处理“陌生人”名称的形式,如那些有新闻,因为有些人会声称:

IFS= read -rd '' DIR < <([[ $BASH_SOURCE != */* ]] || cd "${BASH_SOURCE%/*}/" >&- && echo -n "$PWD")

dirname ${BASH_SOURCE[${#BASH_SOURCE[@]} - 1]}

如果您想跟随同步链接,请使用您上面的路径上的阅读链接,重复或非重复。

#
# Location: test1/test2/test_script.sh
#
echo $0
echo $_
echo ${BASH_SOURCE}
echo ${BASH_SOURCE[${#BASH_SOURCE[@]} - 1]}

cur_file="${BASH_SOURCE[${#BASH_SOURCE[@]} - 1]}"
cur_dir="$(dirname "${cur_file}")"
source "${cur_dir}/func_def.sh"

function test_within_func_inside {
    echo ${BASH_SOURCE}
    echo ${BASH_SOURCE[${#BASH_SOURCE[@]} - 1]}
}

echo "Testing within function inside"
test_within_func_inside

echo "Testing within function outside"
test_within_func_outside

#
# Location: test1/test2/func_def.sh
#
function test_within_func_outside {
    echo ${BASH_SOURCE}
    echo ${BASH_SOURCE[${#BASH_SOURCE[@]} - 1]}
}

BASH - 来源

一个序列变量,其成员是源文件名,在 FUNCNAME序列变量中定义了相应的序列函数名称。

功能

这个变量可以使用 BASH_LINENO 和 BASH_SOURCE. FUNCNAME 的每个元素都有相应的元素在 BASH_LINENO 和 BASH_SOURCE 描述呼叫板. 例如, ${FUNCNAME[$i]} 被呼叫从文件 ${BASH_SOURCE[$i+1]} 到线号 ${BASH_LINENO[$i]}。

(源:Bash手册)

pwd 可以用来找到当前工作目录,而 dirname 可以用来找到特定文件的目录(运行命令为 $0,所以 dirname $0 应该给你当前脚本的目录)。

然而,字体名称给出了字体名称的目录部分,这更有可能与当前工作目录无关,如果你的脚本需要因某种原因更改目录,那么字体名称的输出就会变得毫无意义。

我建议如下:

#!/usr/bin/env bash

reldir="$( dirname -- "$0"; )";
cd "$reldir";
directory="$( pwd; )";

echo "Directory is ${directory}";

这样,你就得到一个绝对的,而不是一个相对的目录。

由于脚本将在一个单独的Bash例子中运行,没有必要恢复工作目录后,但如果你想因某种原因改变你的脚本,你可以轻松地将PWD的值分配给一个变量,在你更改目录之前,用于未来的使用。

雖然只是

cd "$( dirname -- "$0"; )";

解决这个问题的具体场景,我发现有绝对的道路到更有用的一般。

#!/bin/sh
PRG="$0"

# need this for relative symlinks
while [ -h "$PRG" ] ; do
   PRG=`readlink "$PRG"`
done

scriptdir=`dirname "$PRG"`