David Goodger(在这里的“像Pythonista一样编码”中)描述了PEP 8的建议如下:

Joined_lower函数，方法， 属性、变量 joined_lower或ALL_CAPS for 常量 课程用的studlycap 骆驼案只符合 已有的约定

通常，要遵循语言标准库中使用的约定。

有一篇关于这方面的论文:http://www.cs.kent.edu/~jmaletic/papers/ICPC2010-CamelCaseUnderScoreClouds.pdf

它说snake_case比camelCase可读性更好。这就是为什么现代语言在任何可能的地方都使用(或应该使用)蛇。

谷歌Python风格指南有以下约定:

module_name, package_name, ClassName, method_name, ExceptionName, function_name, GLOBAL_CONSTANT_NAME, global_var_name, instance_var_name, function_parameter_name, local_var_name。

CLASS_CONSTANT_NAME应该应用类似的命名方案

There is PEP 8, as other answers show, but PEP 8 is only the styleguide for the standard library, and it's only taken as gospel therein. One of the most frequent deviations of PEP 8 for other pieces of code is the variable naming, specifically for methods. There is no single predominate style, although considering the volume of code that uses mixedCase, if one were to make a strict census one would probably end up with a version of PEP 8 with mixedCase. There is little other deviation from PEP 8 that is quite as common.

David Goodger(在这里的“像Pythonista一样编码”中)描述了PEP 8的建议如下:

Joined_lower函数，方法， 属性、变量 joined_lower或ALL_CAPS for 常量 课程用的studlycap 骆驼案只符合 已有的约定