我刚刚在c# 2.0中写了一个字符串反向函数(即LINQ不可用),然后想到了这个:
public string Reverse(string text)
{
char[] cArray = text.ToCharArray();
string reverse = String.Empty;
for (int i = cArray.Length - 1; i > -1; i--)
{
reverse += cArray[i];
}
return reverse;
}
就我个人而言,我并不喜欢这个功能,我相信有更好的方法来实现它。是吗?
我从Microsoft.VisualBasic.Strings中做了一个c#移植。我不知道他们为什么把这么有用的函数(从VB)保存在系统之外。框架中的字符串,但仍然在Microsoft.VisualBasic下。同样的场景用于财务函数(例如microsoft . visualbasic . finance . pmt())。
public static string StrReverse(this string expression)
{
if ((expression == null))
return "";
int srcIndex;
var length = expression.Length;
if (length == 0)
return "";
//CONSIDER: Get System.String to add a surrogate aware Reverse method
//Detect if there are any graphemes that need special handling
for (srcIndex = 0; srcIndex <= length - 1; srcIndex++)
{
var ch = expression[srcIndex];
var uc = char.GetUnicodeCategory(ch);
if (uc == UnicodeCategory.Surrogate || uc == UnicodeCategory.NonSpacingMark || uc == UnicodeCategory.SpacingCombiningMark || uc == UnicodeCategory.EnclosingMark)
{
//Need to use special handling
return InternalStrReverse(expression, srcIndex, length);
}
}
var chars = expression.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(chars);
return new string(chars);
}
///<remarks>This routine handles reversing Strings containing graphemes
/// GRAPHEME: a text element that is displayed as a single character</remarks>
private static string InternalStrReverse(string expression, int srcIndex, int length)
{
//This code can only be hit one time
var sb = new StringBuilder(length) { Length = length };
var textEnum = StringInfo.GetTextElementEnumerator(expression, srcIndex);
//Init enumerator position
if (!textEnum.MoveNext())
{
return "";
}
var lastSrcIndex = 0;
var destIndex = length - 1;
//Copy up the first surrogate found
while (lastSrcIndex < srcIndex)
{
sb[destIndex] = expression[lastSrcIndex];
destIndex -= 1;
lastSrcIndex += 1;
}
//Now iterate through the text elements and copy them to the reversed string
var nextSrcIndex = textEnum.ElementIndex;
while (destIndex >= 0)
{
srcIndex = nextSrcIndex;
//Move to next element
nextSrcIndex = (textEnum.MoveNext()) ? textEnum.ElementIndex : length;
lastSrcIndex = nextSrcIndex - 1;
while (lastSrcIndex >= srcIndex)
{
sb[destIndex] = expression[lastSrcIndex];
destIndex -= 1;
lastSrcIndex -= 1;
}
}
return sb.ToString();
}
很抱歉在这个旧帖子上发帖。我在为面试练习一些代码。
这是我为c#设计的。在重构之前,我的第一个版本非常糟糕。
static String Reverse2(string str)
{
int strLen = str.Length, elem = strLen - 1;
char[] charA = new char[strLen];
for (int i = 0; i < strLen; i++)
{
charA[elem] = str[i];
elem--;
}
return new String(charA);
}
对比数组。相反的方法下面,它出现更快的12个字符或更少的字符串。13个字符后,数组。倒车开始变得更快,最终在速度上占主导地位。我只是想指出速度开始变化的大致位置。
static String Reverse(string str)
{
char[] charA = str.ToCharArray();
Array.Reverse(charA);
return new String(charA);
}
在字符串中有100个字符时,它比我的版本x 4快。然而,如果我知道字符串总是小于13个字符,我就会使用我所创建的字符串。
测试使用Stopwatch进行,并进行了500万次迭代。此外,我不确定我的版本是否处理代理或组合字符情况与Unicode编码。