我有一些正在测试的代码，它调用Java记录器来报告其状态。 在JUnit测试代码中，我想验证在这个日志记录器中创建了正确的日志条目。大致如下:
methodUnderTest(bool x){
if(x)
logger.info("x happened")
}
@Test tester(){
// perhaps setup a logger first.
methodUnderTest(true);
assertXXXXXX(loggedLevel(),Level.INFO);
}
我认为这可以用一个经过特别调整的记录器(或处理程序或格式化程序)来完成，但我更愿意重用现有的解决方案。(而且，老实说，我不清楚如何从记录器获得logRecord，但假设这是可能的。)
当前回答
这里有一个简单有效的Logback解决方案。 它不需要添加/创建任何新类。 它依赖于ListAppender:一个白盒回logback appender，其中将日志条目添加到公共List字段中，我们可以使用该字段来进行断言。
这里有一个简单的例子。
Foo类:
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
public class Foo {
static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Foo .class);
public void doThat() {
LOGGER.info("start");
//...
LOGGER.info("finish");
}
}
FooTest类:
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
import ch.qos.logback.classic.Level;
import ch.qos.logback.classic.Logger;
import ch.qos.logback.classic.spi.ILoggingEvent;
import ch.qos.logback.core.read.ListAppender;
public class FooTest {
@Test
void doThat() throws Exception {
// get Logback Logger
Logger fooLogger = (Logger) LoggerFactory.getLogger(Foo.class);
// create and start a ListAppender
ListAppender<ILoggingEvent> listAppender = new ListAppender<>();
listAppender.start();
// add the appender to the logger
// addAppender is outdated now
fooLogger.addAppender(listAppender);
// call method under test
Foo foo = new Foo();
foo.doThat();
// JUnit assertions
List<ILoggingEvent> logsList = listAppender.list;
assertEquals("start", logsList.get(0)
.getMessage());
assertEquals(Level.INFO, logsList.get(0)
.getLevel());
assertEquals("finish", logsList.get(1)
.getMessage());
assertEquals(Level.INFO, logsList.get(1)
.getLevel());
}
}
JUnit断言听起来不太适合断言列表元素的某些特定属性。 像AssertJ或Hamcrest这样的Matcher/断言库似乎更好:
使用AssertJ，它将是:
import org.assertj.core.api.Assertions;
Assertions.assertThat(listAppender.list)
.extracting(ILoggingEvent::getMessage, ILoggingEvent::getLevel)
.containsExactly(Tuple.tuple("start", Level.INFO), Tuple.tuple("finish", Level.INFO));
其他回答
对于我来说，您可以通过使用JUnit和Mockito来简化您的测试。 我提出以下解决方案:
import org.apache.log4j.Appender;
import org.apache.log4j.Level;
import org.apache.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.log4j.spi.LoggingEvent;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.ArgumentCaptor;
import org.mockito.Captor;
import org.mockito.InjectMocks;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;
import java.util.List;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.tuple;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.times;
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class MyLogTest {
private static final String FIRST_MESSAGE = "First message";
private static final String SECOND_MESSAGE = "Second message";
@Mock private Appender appender;
@Captor private ArgumentCaptor<LoggingEvent> captor;
@InjectMocks private MyLog;
@Before
public void setUp() {
LogManager.getRootLogger().addAppender(appender);
}
@After
public void tearDown() {
LogManager.getRootLogger().removeAppender(appender);
}
@Test
public void shouldLogExactlyTwoMessages() {
testedClass.foo();
then(appender).should(times(2)).doAppend(captor.capture());
List<LoggingEvent> loggingEvents = captor.getAllValues();
assertThat(loggingEvents).extracting("level", "renderedMessage").containsExactly(
tuple(Level.INFO, FIRST_MESSAGE)
tuple(Level.INFO, SECOND_MESSAGE)
);
}
}
这就是为什么我们对不同消息量的测试有很好的灵活性
I also ran into the same challanged and ended up at this page. Although I am 11 years too late to answers the question, I thought maybe it could be still usefull for others. I found the answer of davidxxx with Logback and the ListAppander very usefull. I used the same configuration for multiple projects, however it was not so fun to copy/paste it and maintaining all the version when I needed to changes something. I thought it would be better to make a library out of it and contribute back to the community. It works with SLFJ4, Log4j, Log4j2, Java Util Logging, JBoss Logging and with Lombok annotations. Please have a look here: LogCaptor for detailed examples and how to add it to your project.
示例情况:
public class FooService {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(FooService.class);
public void sayHello() {
LOGGER.warn("Congratulations, you are pregnant!");
}
}
使用LogCaptor的单元测试示例:
import nl.altindag.log.LogCaptor;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
public class FooServiceTest {
@Test
public void sayHelloShouldLogWarnMessage() {
LogCaptor logCaptor = LogCaptor.forClass(FooService.class);
FooService fooService = new FooService();
fooService.sayHello();
assertThat(logCaptor.getWarnLogs())
.contains("Congratulations, you are pregnant!");
}
}
我不太确定是否应该在这里发布这篇文章，因为这也可以被视为推广“我的库”的一种方式，但我认为这对面临同样挑战的开发人员有帮助。
正如前面提到的，您可以使用mock框架。为此，您必须在类中公开记录器(尽管我可能更倾向于使其包私有而不是创建公共setter)。
另一种解决方案是手工创建一个假记录器。您必须编写伪记录器(更多的fixture代码)，但在这种情况下，我更喜欢使用模拟框架中保存的代码来增强测试的可读性。
我会这样做:
class FakeLogger implements ILogger {
public List<String> infos = new ArrayList<String>();
public List<String> errors = new ArrayList<String>();
public void info(String message) {
infos.add(message);
}
public void error(String message) {
errors.add(message);
}
}
class TestMyClass {
private MyClass myClass;
private FakeLogger logger;
@Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
myClass = new MyClass();
logger = new FakeLogger();
myClass.logger = logger;
}
@Test
public void testMyMethod() {
myClass.myMethod(true);
assertEquals(1, logger.infos.size());
}
}
这里有一个简单有效的Logback解决方案。 它不需要添加/创建任何新类。 它依赖于ListAppender:一个白盒回logback appender，其中将日志条目添加到公共List字段中，我们可以使用该字段来进行断言。
这里有一个简单的例子。
Foo类:
import org.slf4j.Logger;
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
public class Foo {
static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Foo .class);
public void doThat() {
LOGGER.info("start");
//...
LOGGER.info("finish");
}
}
FooTest类:
import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
import ch.qos.logback.classic.Level;
import ch.qos.logback.classic.Logger;
import ch.qos.logback.classic.spi.ILoggingEvent;
import ch.qos.logback.core.read.ListAppender;
public class FooTest {
@Test
void doThat() throws Exception {
// get Logback Logger
Logger fooLogger = (Logger) LoggerFactory.getLogger(Foo.class);
// create and start a ListAppender
ListAppender<ILoggingEvent> listAppender = new ListAppender<>();
listAppender.start();
// add the appender to the logger
// addAppender is outdated now
fooLogger.addAppender(listAppender);
// call method under test
Foo foo = new Foo();
foo.doThat();
// JUnit assertions
List<ILoggingEvent> logsList = listAppender.list;
assertEquals("start", logsList.get(0)
.getMessage());
assertEquals(Level.INFO, logsList.get(0)
.getLevel());
assertEquals("finish", logsList.get(1)
.getMessage());
assertEquals(Level.INFO, logsList.get(1)
.getLevel());
}
}
JUnit断言听起来不太适合断言列表元素的某些特定属性。 像AssertJ或Hamcrest这样的Matcher/断言库似乎更好:
使用AssertJ，它将是:
import org.assertj.core.api.Assertions;
Assertions.assertThat(listAppender.list)
.extracting(ILoggingEvent::getMessage, ILoggingEvent::getLevel)
.containsExactly(Tuple.tuple("start", Level.INFO), Tuple.tuple("finish", Level.INFO));
通过添加Appender进行单元测试并不能真正测试Logger的配置。因此，我认为这是一种独特的情况，在这种情况下，单元测试没有带来那么多价值，而集成测试带来了很多价值(特别是如果您的日志有一些审计目的)。
为了为它创建集成测试，让我们假设您正在运行一个简单的ConsoleAppender，并希望测试它的输出。然后，您应该测试如何将消息从System.out写入到它自己的ByteArrayOutputStream。
从这个意义上说，我会做以下事情(我使用JUnit 5):
public class Slf4jAuditLoggerTest {
private final ByteArrayOutputStream outContent = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
@BeforeEach
public void beforeEach() {
System.setOut(new PrintStream(outContent));
}
通过这种方式，你可以简单地测试它的输出:
@Test
public void myTest() {
// Given...
// When...
// Then
assertTrue(outContent.toString().contains("[INFO] My formatted string from Logger"));
}
如果你这样做了，你将为你的项目带来更多的价值，而不需要使用内存中的实现，创建一个新的Appender，或者其他什么。
