我有一些正在测试的代码,它调用Java记录器来报告其状态。
在JUnit测试代码中,我想验证在这个日志记录器中创建了正确的日志条目。大致如下:
methodUnderTest(bool x){
if(x)
logger.info("x happened")
}
@Test tester(){
// perhaps setup a logger first.
methodUnderTest(true);
assertXXXXXX(loggedLevel(),Level.INFO);
}
我认为这可以用一个经过特别调整的记录器(或处理程序或格式化程序)来完成,但我更愿意重用现有的解决方案。(而且,老实说,我不清楚如何从记录器获得logRecord,但假设这是可能的。)
正如前面提到的,您可以使用mock框架。为此,您必须在类中公开记录器(尽管我可能更倾向于使其包私有而不是创建公共setter)。
另一种解决方案是手工创建一个假记录器。您必须编写伪记录器(更多的fixture代码),但在这种情况下,我更喜欢使用模拟框架中保存的代码来增强测试的可读性。
我会这样做:
class FakeLogger implements ILogger {
public List<String> infos = new ArrayList<String>();
public List<String> errors = new ArrayList<String>();
public void info(String message) {
infos.add(message);
}
public void error(String message) {
errors.add(message);
}
}
class TestMyClass {
private MyClass myClass;
private FakeLogger logger;
@Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
myClass = new MyClass();
logger = new FakeLogger();
myClass.logger = logger;
}
@Test
public void testMyMethod() {
myClass.myMethod(true);
assertEquals(1, logger.infos.size());
}
}
请注意,在Log4J 2中。X,公共接口org.apache.logging.log4j。Logger不包括setAppender()和removeAppender()方法。
但是,如果您没有做太花哨的事情,您应该能够将它强制转换为实现类org.apache.logging.log4j.core。记录器,它公开了这些方法。
这里有一个Mockito和AssertJ的例子:
// Import the implementation class rather than the API interface
import org.apache.logging.log4j.core.Logger;
// Cast logger to implementation class to get access to setAppender/removeAppender
Logger log = (Logger) LogManager.getLogger(MyClassUnderTest.class);
// Set up the mock appender, stubbing some methods Log4J needs internally
Appender appender = mock(Appender.class);
when(appender.getName()).thenReturn("Mock Appender");
when(appender.isStarted()).thenReturn(true);
log.addAppender(appender);
try {
new MyClassUnderTest().doSomethingThatShouldLogAnError();
} finally {
log.removeAppender(appender);
}
// Verify that we got an error with the expected message
ArgumentCaptor<LogEvent> logEventCaptor = ArgumentCaptor.forClass(LogEvent.class);
verify(appender).append(logEventCaptor.capture());
LogEvent logEvent = logEventCaptor.getValue();
assertThat(logEvent.getLevel()).isEqualTo(Level.ERROR);
assertThat(logEvent.getMessage().getFormattedMessage()).contains(expectedErrorMessage);
对于我来说,您可以通过使用JUnit和Mockito来简化您的测试。
我提出以下解决方案:
import org.apache.log4j.Appender;
import org.apache.log4j.Level;
import org.apache.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.log4j.spi.LoggingEvent;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.ArgumentCaptor;
import org.mockito.Captor;
import org.mockito.InjectMocks;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;
import java.util.List;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.tuple;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.times;
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class MyLogTest {
private static final String FIRST_MESSAGE = "First message";
private static final String SECOND_MESSAGE = "Second message";
@Mock private Appender appender;
@Captor private ArgumentCaptor<LoggingEvent> captor;
@InjectMocks private MyLog;
@Before
public void setUp() {
LogManager.getRootLogger().addAppender(appender);
}
@After
public void tearDown() {
LogManager.getRootLogger().removeAppender(appender);
}
@Test
public void shouldLogExactlyTwoMessages() {
testedClass.foo();
then(appender).should(times(2)).doAppend(captor.capture());
List<LoggingEvent> loggingEvents = captor.getAllValues();
assertThat(loggingEvents).extracting("level", "renderedMessage").containsExactly(
tuple(Level.INFO, FIRST_MESSAGE)
tuple(Level.INFO, SECOND_MESSAGE)
);
}
}
这就是为什么我们对不同消息量的测试有很好的灵活性