我有一些正在测试的代码,它调用Java记录器来报告其状态。
在JUnit测试代码中,我想验证在这个日志记录器中创建了正确的日志条目。大致如下:
methodUnderTest(bool x){
if(x)
logger.info("x happened")
}
@Test tester(){
// perhaps setup a logger first.
methodUnderTest(true);
assertXXXXXX(loggedLevel(),Level.INFO);
}
我认为这可以用一个经过特别调整的记录器(或处理程序或格式化程序)来完成,但我更愿意重用现有的解决方案。(而且,老实说,我不清楚如何从记录器获得logRecord,但假设这是可能的。)
I've needed this several times as well. I've put together a small sample below, which you'd want to adjust to your needs. Basically, you create your own Appender and add it to the logger you want. If you'd want to collect everything, the root logger is a good place to start, but you can use a more specific if you'd like. Don't forget to remove the Appender when you're done, otherwise you might create a memory leak. Below I've done it within the test, but setUp or @Before and tearDown or @After might be better places, depending on your needs.
此外,下面的实现将所有内容收集到内存中的List中。如果您记录了很多日志,您可能会考虑添加一个过滤器来删除无聊的条目,或者将日志写入磁盘上的临时文件(提示:LoggingEvent是可序列化的,因此如果您的日志消息是可序列化的,那么您应该能够序列化事件对象)。
import org.apache.log4j.AppenderSkeleton;
import org.apache.log4j.Level;
import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
import org.apache.log4j.spi.LoggingEvent;
import org.junit.Test;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import static org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.is;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThat;
public class MyTest {
@Test
public void test() {
final TestAppender appender = new TestAppender();
final Logger logger = Logger.getRootLogger();
logger.addAppender(appender);
try {
Logger.getLogger(MyTest.class).info("Test");
}
finally {
logger.removeAppender(appender);
}
final List<LoggingEvent> log = appender.getLog();
final LoggingEvent firstLogEntry = log.get(0);
assertThat(firstLogEntry.getLevel(), is(Level.INFO));
assertThat((String) firstLogEntry.getMessage(), is("Test"));
assertThat(firstLogEntry.getLoggerName(), is("MyTest"));
}
}
class TestAppender extends AppenderSkeleton {
private final List<LoggingEvent> log = new ArrayList<LoggingEvent>();
@Override
public boolean requiresLayout() {
return false;
}
@Override
protected void append(final LoggingEvent loggingEvent) {
log.add(loggingEvent);
}
@Override
public void close() {
}
public List<LoggingEvent> getLog() {
return new ArrayList<LoggingEvent>(log);
}
}
正如前面提到的,您可以使用mock框架。为此,您必须在类中公开记录器(尽管我可能更倾向于使其包私有而不是创建公共setter)。
另一种解决方案是手工创建一个假记录器。您必须编写伪记录器(更多的fixture代码),但在这种情况下,我更喜欢使用模拟框架中保存的代码来增强测试的可读性。
我会这样做:
class FakeLogger implements ILogger {
public List<String> infos = new ArrayList<String>();
public List<String> errors = new ArrayList<String>();
public void info(String message) {
infos.add(message);
}
public void error(String message) {
errors.add(message);
}
}
class TestMyClass {
private MyClass myClass;
private FakeLogger logger;
@Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
myClass = new MyClass();
logger = new FakeLogger();
myClass.logger = logger;
}
@Test
public void testMyMethod() {
myClass.myMethod(true);
assertEquals(1, logger.infos.size());
}
}
对于我来说,您可以通过使用JUnit和Mockito来简化您的测试。
我提出以下解决方案:
import org.apache.log4j.Appender;
import org.apache.log4j.Level;
import org.apache.log4j.LogManager;
import org.apache.log4j.spi.LoggingEvent;
import org.junit.After;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.mockito.ArgumentCaptor;
import org.mockito.Captor;
import org.mockito.InjectMocks;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.runners.MockitoJUnitRunner;
import java.util.List;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat;
import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.tuple;
import static org.mockito.Mockito.times;
@RunWith(MockitoJUnitRunner.class)
public class MyLogTest {
private static final String FIRST_MESSAGE = "First message";
private static final String SECOND_MESSAGE = "Second message";
@Mock private Appender appender;
@Captor private ArgumentCaptor<LoggingEvent> captor;
@InjectMocks private MyLog;
@Before
public void setUp() {
LogManager.getRootLogger().addAppender(appender);
}
@After
public void tearDown() {
LogManager.getRootLogger().removeAppender(appender);
}
@Test
public void shouldLogExactlyTwoMessages() {
testedClass.foo();
then(appender).should(times(2)).doAppend(captor.capture());
List<LoggingEvent> loggingEvents = captor.getAllValues();
assertThat(loggingEvents).extracting("level", "renderedMessage").containsExactly(
tuple(Level.INFO, FIRST_MESSAGE)
tuple(Level.INFO, SECOND_MESSAGE)
);
}
}
这就是为什么我们对不同消息量的测试有很好的灵活性
另一个值得提及的想法是创建一个CDI生成器来注入记录器,这样模拟就变得容易了,尽管这是一个较老的主题。(而且它还提供了不必再声明“整个logger语句”的优势,但这已经跑题了)
例子:
创建要注入的记录器:
public class CdiResources {
@Produces @LoggerType
public Logger createLogger(final InjectionPoint ip) {
return Logger.getLogger(ip.getMember().getDeclaringClass());
}
}
限定符:
@Qualifier
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Target({TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
public @interface LoggerType {
}
在生产代码中使用记录器:
public class ProductionCode {
@Inject
@LoggerType
private Logger logger;
public void logSomething() {
logger.info("something");
}
}
在测试代码中测试记录器(给出一个easyMock示例):
@TestSubject
private ProductionCode productionCode = new ProductionCode();
@Mock
private Logger logger;
@Test
public void testTheLogger() {
logger.info("something");
replayAll();
productionCode.logSomething();
}