假设你有一些对象,它们有几个字段可以比较:

public class Person {

    private String firstName;
    private String lastName;
    private String age;

    /* Constructors */

    /* Methods */

}

所以在这个例子中,当你问if:

a.compareTo(b) > 0

你可能会问a的姓是不是在b的姓之前,或者a的年龄是不是比b大,等等……

在不增加不必要的混乱或开销的情况下,在这些类型的对象之间进行多重比较的最干净的方法是什么?

comparable接口只允许通过一个字段进行比较 在我看来,添加大量的比较方法(如compareByFirstName(), compareByAge()等)是混乱的。

那么最好的解决办法是什么呢?


当前回答

使用java8:

Comparator.comparing((Person p)->p.firstName)
          .thenComparing(p->p.lastName)
          .thenComparingInt(p->p.age);

如果你有访问方法:

Comparator.comparing(Person::getFirstName)
          .thenComparing(Person::getLastName)
          .thenComparingInt(Person::getAge);

如果一个类实现Comparable,那么这个比较器可以用在compareTo方法中:

@Override
public int compareTo(Person o){
    return Comparator.comparing(Person::getFirstName)
              .thenComparing(Person::getLastName)
              .thenComparingInt(Person::getAge)
              .compare(this, o);
}

其他回答

在java中使用hashcode方法比较两个对象很容易。

public class Sample{

  String a=null;
  String b=null;

  public Sample(){
      a="s";
      b="a";
  }
  public Sample(String a,String b){
      this.a=a;
      this.b=b;
  }
  public static void main(String args[]){
      Sample f=new Sample("b","12");
      Sample s=new Sample("b","12");
      //will return true
      System.out.println((s.a.hashCode()+s.b.hashCode())==(f.a.hashCode()+f.b.hashCode()));

      //will return false
      Sample f=new Sample("b","12");
      Sample s=new Sample("b","13");
      System.out.println((s.a.hashCode()+s.b.hashCode())==(f.a.hashCode()+f.b.hashCode()));

}

Java 8通过lambda方式我们可以通过方法引用进行比较。 学生POJO

public class Student {
int id;
String firstName;
String lastName;
String subject;

public Student(int id, String firstName, String lastName, String subject) {
    this.id = id;
    this.firstName = firstName;
    this.lastName = lastName;
    this.subject = subject;
}
enter code here

现在我们可以根据

1. id - > FirstName - > LastName - > 2。主题- > id - > FirstName - > LastName

我们将在数组Stream中使用Comparator

public class TestComprator {
public static void main(String[] args) {
    Student s1= new Student(108, "James", "Testo", "Physics");
    Student s2= new Student(101, "Fundu", "Barito", "Chem");
    Student s3= new Student(105, "Sindhu", "Sharan", "Math");
    Student s4= new Student(98, "Rechel", "Stephen", "Physics");
    System.out.printf("----------id->FirstName->LastName->Subject-------------");
    Arrays.asList(s1,s2,s3,s4).stream()
            .sorted(Comparator.comparing(Student::getId)
                    .thenComparing(Student::getFirstName)
                .thenComparing(Student::getLastName)
                .thenComparing(Student::getSubject))
            .forEach(System.out::println);

    System.out.printf("----Subject->id->FirstName->LastName ------\n");
    Arrays.asList(s1,s2,s3,s4).stream()
            .sorted(Comparator. comparing(Student::getSubject)
                    .thenComparing(Student::getId)
                    .thenComparing(Student::getFirstName)
                    .thenComparing(Student::getLastName)
                   )
            .forEach(System.out::println);
}

}

输出:

`----------id->FirstName->LastName->Subject-------------
Student{id=98, firstName='Rechel', lastName='Stephen', subject='Physics'}
Student{id=101, firstName='Fundu', lastName='Barito', subject='Chem'}
Student{id=105, firstName='Sindhu', lastName='Sharan', subject='Math'}
Student{id=108, firstName='James', lastName='Testo', subject='Physics'}
 ----Subject->id->FirstName->LastName ------
Student{id=101, firstName='Fundu', lastName='Barito', subject='Chem'}
Student{id=105, firstName='Sindhu', lastName='Sharan', subject='Math'}
Student{id=98, firstName='Rechel', lastName='Stephen', subject='Physics'}
Student{id=108, firstName='James', lastName='Testo', subject='Physics'}

我认为如果你的比较算法是“聪明的”,那就更令人困惑了。我会选择你建议的众多比较方法。

对我来说唯一的例外就是平等。对于单元测试,重写. equals(在.net中)对我来说很有用,以便确定两个对象之间的几个字段是否相等(而不是引用是否相等)。

对于那些能够使用Java 8流API的人来说,这里有一个更整洁的方法: lambda和排序

我正在寻找相当于c# LINQ:

.ThenBy(...)

我在Comparator上找到了Java 8的机制:

.thenComparing(...)

下面是演示算法的代码片段。

    Comparator<Person> comparator = Comparator.comparing(person -> person.name);
    comparator = comparator.thenComparing(Comparator.comparing(person -> person.age));

请查看上面的链接,以获得更简洁的方法,并解释Java的类型推断如何使其与LINQ相比定义起来更笨拙。

下面是完整的单元测试供参考:

@Test
public void testChainedSorting()
{
    // Create the collection of people:
    ArrayList<Person> people = new ArrayList<>();
    people.add(new Person("Dan", 4));
    people.add(new Person("Andi", 2));
    people.add(new Person("Bob", 42));
    people.add(new Person("Debby", 3));
    people.add(new Person("Bob", 72));
    people.add(new Person("Barry", 20));
    people.add(new Person("Cathy", 40));
    people.add(new Person("Bob", 40));
    people.add(new Person("Barry", 50));

    // Define chained comparators:
    // Great article explaining this and how to make it even neater:
    // http://blog.jooq.org/2014/01/31/java-8-friday-goodies-lambdas-and-sorting/
    Comparator<Person> comparator = Comparator.comparing(person -> person.name);
    comparator = comparator.thenComparing(Comparator.comparing(person -> person.age));

    // Sort the stream:
    Stream<Person> personStream = people.stream().sorted(comparator);

    // Make sure that the output is as expected:
    List<Person> sortedPeople = personStream.collect(Collectors.toList());
    Assert.assertEquals("Andi",  sortedPeople.get(0).name); Assert.assertEquals(2,  sortedPeople.get(0).age);
    Assert.assertEquals("Barry", sortedPeople.get(1).name); Assert.assertEquals(20, sortedPeople.get(1).age);
    Assert.assertEquals("Barry", sortedPeople.get(2).name); Assert.assertEquals(50, sortedPeople.get(2).age);
    Assert.assertEquals("Bob",   sortedPeople.get(3).name); Assert.assertEquals(40, sortedPeople.get(3).age);
    Assert.assertEquals("Bob",   sortedPeople.get(4).name); Assert.assertEquals(42, sortedPeople.get(4).age);
    Assert.assertEquals("Bob",   sortedPeople.get(5).name); Assert.assertEquals(72, sortedPeople.get(5).age);
    Assert.assertEquals("Cathy", sortedPeople.get(6).name); Assert.assertEquals(40, sortedPeople.get(6).age);
    Assert.assertEquals("Dan",   sortedPeople.get(7).name); Assert.assertEquals(4,  sortedPeople.get(7).age);
    Assert.assertEquals("Debby", sortedPeople.get(8).name); Assert.assertEquals(3,  sortedPeople.get(8).age);
    // Andi     : 2
    // Barry    : 20
    // Barry    : 50
    // Bob      : 40
    // Bob      : 42
    // Bob      : 72
    // Cathy    : 40
    // Dan      : 4
    // Debby    : 3
}

/**
 * A person in our system.
 */
public static class Person
{
    /**
     * Creates a new person.
     * @param name The name of the person.
     * @param age The age of the person.
     */
    public Person(String name, int age)
    {
        this.age = age;
        this.name = name;
    }

    /**
     * The name of the person.
     */
    public String name;

    /**
     * The age of the person.
     */
    public int age;

    @Override
    public String toString()
    {
        if (name == null) return super.toString();
        else return String.format("%s : %d", this.name, this.age);
    }
}

晚做总比不到好——如果你正在寻找不必要的混乱或开销,那么很难同时在最少的代码/快速执行方面击败下面的方法。

数据类:

public class MyData {
    int id;
    boolean relevant;
    String name;
    float value;
}

比较器:

public class MultiFieldComparator implements Comparator<MyData> {
    @Override
    public int compare(MyData dataA, MyData dataB) {
        int result;
        if((result = Integer.compare(dataA.id, dataB.id)) == 0 &&
           (result = Boolean.compare(dataA.relevant, dataB.relevant)) == 0 &&
           (result = dataA.name.compareTo(dataB.name)) == 0)
            result = Float.compare(dataA.value, dataB.value);
        return result;
    }
}

如果你只是想按自定义顺序对集合进行排序,那么下面的代码就更清晰了:

myDataList.sort((dataA, dataB) -> {
    int result;
    if((result = Integer.compare(dataA.id, dataB.id)) == 0 &&
       (result = Boolean.compare(dataA.relevant, dataB.relevant)) == 0 &&
       (result = dataA.name.compareTo(dataB.name)) == 0)
        result = Float.compare(dataA.value, dataB.value);
    return result;
});