I'd look around to find some (3rd party?) components that do what you want. I've had to create custom Swing components for an agenda view where you can book multiple resources, as well as an Excel-like grid that works well with keyboard navigation and so on. I had a terrible time getting them to work nicely because I needed to delve into many of Swing's many intricacies whenever I came upon a problem. Mouse and focus behaviour and a lot of other things can be very difficult to get right, especially for a casual Swing user. I would hope that JavaFX is a bit more future-orientated and smooth out of the box.

I'd look around to find some (3rd party?) components that do what you want. I've had to create custom Swing components for an agenda view where you can book multiple resources, as well as an Excel-like grid that works well with keyboard navigation and so on. I had a terrible time getting them to work nicely because I needed to delve into many of Swing's many intricacies whenever I came upon a problem. Mouse and focus behaviour and a lot of other things can be very difficult to get right, especially for a casual Swing user. I would hope that JavaFX is a bit more future-orientated and smooth out of the box.

在集成了视频的旧笔记本电脑上，Swing应用程序启动和运行速度比JavaFX应用程序快得多。至于开发，我建议切换到Scala -可比的Scala Swing应用程序包含2..代码比Java少3倍。 至于Swing vs SWT: Netbeans GUI比Eclipse快得多……

什么会更干净、更容易维护?

在所有条件都相同的情况下，JavaFX的API在组件之间更加一致。然而，这在很大程度上取决于代码是如何编写的，而不是使用什么库来编写它。

从头开始构建什么会更快?

高度依赖于你正在构建的东西。Swing有更多的组件(第三方的和内置的)，但并不是所有的组件都在更新的JavaFX平台上，所以如果您需要一些自定义的东西，可能需要重新发明一些东西。另一方面，如果你想要做过渡/动画/视频之类的东西，那么这在FX中要容易几个数量级。

另一件要记住的事情是(也许)外观和感觉。如果您绝对必须拥有默认的系统外观，那么JavaFX(目前)无法提供这一点。对我来说不是一个大的必须(我更喜欢默认的FX外观)，但我知道一些政策要求限制系统风格。

就我个人而言，我认为JavaFX是“即将到来的”UI库，它还没有完全实现(但不仅仅是可用的)，而Swing是边缘的传统UI库，它目前具有完整的功能和支持，但在未来几年可能不会那么多(因此FX有可能在某个时候超过它)。

没有人提到它，但是JavaFX不能在Oracle认为是“服务器”的某些架构上编译或运行(例如Solaris)，因为缺少“jfxrt.jar”支持。继续使用SWT，直到进一步通知。

我不认为这个问题有任何正确的答案，但我的建议是坚持使用SWT，除非您遇到了需要进行如此大规模检修的严重限制。

而且，SWT实际上比Swing更新，维护也更积极。(它最初是作为使用本地组件的Swing的替代品开发的)。