因为您正在使用ARC，所以必须使用iOS 4.0或更高版本。这意味着你可以使用积木。如果不是记住要执行的选择器，而是取一个块，ARC将能够更好地跟踪实际发生的事情，并且不必冒意外引入内存泄漏的风险。

这里有很多答案，但由于这个有点不同，我把几个答案结合起来，我想我应该把它放进去。我使用一个NSObject类别检查，以确保选择器返回void，也抑制编译器警告。

#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
#import <objc/runtime.h>
#import "Debug.h" // not given; just an assert

@interface NSObject (Extras)

// Enforce the rule that the selector used must return void.
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object;
- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector;

@end

@implementation NSObject (Extras)

// Apparently the reason the regular performSelect gives a compile time warning is that the system doesn't know the return type. I'm going to (a) make sure that the return type is void, and (b) disable this warning
// See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7017281/performselector-may-cause-a-leak-because-its-selector-is-unknown

- (void) checkSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    // See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14602854/objective-c-is-there-a-way-to-check-a-selector-return-value
    Method m = class_getInstanceMethod([self class], aSelector);
    char type[128];
    method_getReturnType(m, type, sizeof(type));

    NSString *message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"NSObject+Extras.performVoidReturnSelector: %@.%@ selector (type: %s)", [self class], NSStringFromSelector(aSelector), type];
    NSLog(@"%@", message);

    if (type[0] != 'v') {
        message = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"%@ was not void", message];
        [Debug assertTrue:FALSE withMessage:message];
    }
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector withObject:(id)object {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    // Since the selector (aSelector) is returning void, it doesn't make sense to try to obtain the return result of performSelector. In fact, if we do, it crashes the app.
    [self performSelector: aSelector withObject: object];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop    
}

- (void) performVoidReturnSelector:(SEL)aSelector {
    [self checkSelector:aSelector];

#pragma clang diagnostic push
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"
    [self performSelector: aSelector];
#pragma clang diagnostic pop
}

@end

要使用执行选择器忽略文件中的错误，添加一个#pragma，如下所示:

#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Warc-performSelector-leaks"

这将忽略这一行上的警告，但仍然允许它贯穿整个项目的其余部分。

为了子孙后代着想，我决定参加竞选:)

最近，我看到越来越多的重构偏离了目标/选择器范式，而倾向于协议、块等。然而，我已经使用过几次的performSelector有一个替代物:

[NSApp sendAction: NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod") to: _controller from: nil];

这些似乎是一个干净的，弧安全的，和几乎相同的替代performSelector没有太多的objc_msgSend()。

不过，我不知道iOS上是否有类似的功能。

下面是基于上面给出的答案更新的宏。这应该允许您使用return语句来包装代码。

#define SUPPRESS_PERFORM_SELECTOR_LEAK_WARNING(code)                        \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic push")                                        \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic ignored \"-Warc-performSelector-leaks\"")     \
    code;                                                                   \
    _Pragma("clang diagnostic pop")                                         \


SUPPRESS_PERFORM_SELECTOR_LEAK_WARNING(
    return [_target performSelector:_action withObject:self]
);

奇怪但事实是:如果可以接受(即result为void并且你不介意让runloop循环一次)，添加一个延迟，即使这是零:

[_controller performSelector:NSSelectorFromString(@"someMethod")
    withObject:nil
    afterDelay:0];

这删除了警告，大概是因为它向编译器保证没有对象可以返回，并且在某种程度上管理不当。