出于某种原因，没有人提到降低sysctl net.ipv4。Ip_unprivileged_port_start到您需要的值。 示例:我们需要将应用程序绑定到443端口。

sysctl net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start=443

有些人可能会说，存在潜在的安全问题:非特权用户现在可能绑定到其他特权端口(444-1024)。 但是你可以用iptables通过阻塞其他端口轻松解决这个问题:

iptables -I INPUT -p tcp --dport 444:1024 -j DROP
iptables -I INPUT -p udp --dport 444:1024 -j DROP

与其他方法的比较。这个方法:

from some point is (IMO) even more secure than setting CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE/setuid, since an application doesn't setuid at all, even partly (capabilities actually are). For example, to catch a coredump of capability-enabled application you will need to change sysctl fs.suid_dumpable (which leads to another potential security problems) Also, when CAP/suid is set, /proc/PID directory is owned by root, so your non-root user will not have full information/control of running process, for example, user will not be able (in common case) to determine which connections belong to application via /proc/PID/fd/ (netstat -aptn | grep PID). has security disadvantage: while your app (or any app that uses ports 443-1024) is down for some reason, another app could take the port. But this problem could also be applied to CAP/suid (in case you set it on interpreter, e.g. java/nodejs) and iptables-redirect. Use systemd-socket method to exclude this problem. Use authbind method to only allow special user binding. doesn't require setting CAP/suid every time you deploy new version of application. doesn't require application support/modification, like systemd-socket method. doesn't require kernel rebuild (if running version supports this sysctl setting) doesn't do LD_PRELOAD like authbind/privbind method, this could potentially affect performance, security, behavior (does it? haven't tested). In the rest authbind is really flexible and secure method. over-performs iptables REDIRECT/DNAT method, since it doesn't require address translation, connection state tracking, etc. This only noticeable on high-load systems.

根据具体情况，我将在sysctl、CAP、authbind和iptables-redirect之间进行选择。我们有这么多选择真是太好了。

在libcap网站上有一个文件共享库链接到非特权应用程序的实例。最近在回答一个关于向共享库添加功能的问题时提到了它。

标准方法是将它们设置为“setuid”，以便它们以根用户身份启动，然后在它们绑定到端口但开始接受到该端口的连接之前丢弃根用户特权。您可以在Apache和INN的源代码中看到这样的好例子。我听说莱特特警局是另一个很好的例子。

另一个例子是Postfix，它使用多个通过管道通信的守护进程，其中只有一两个守护进程(除了接受或发出字节外几乎不做任何事情)以根身份运行，其余的守护进程以较低的权限运行。

在启动时:

iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 8080

然后可以绑定到您转发的端口。

由于OP只是开发/测试，不那么圆滑的解决方案可能会有帮助:

可以在脚本解释器上使用Setcap来为脚本授予功能。如果全局解释器二进制文件上的setcaps是不可接受的，那么就对二进制文件做一个本地副本(任何用户都可以)，并在这个副本上获取root到setcap。Python2(至少)使用脚本开发树中的解释器的本地副本正常工作。不需要suid，因此根用户可以控制用户可以访问哪些功能。

如果你需要跟踪解释器的系统范围的更新，可以使用下面这样的shell脚本来运行你的脚本:

#!/bin/sh
#
#  Watch for updates to the Python2 interpreter

PRG=python_net_raw
PRG_ORIG=/usr/bin/python2.7

cmp $PRG_ORIG $PRG || {
    echo ""
    echo "***** $PRG_ORIG has been updated *****"
    echo "Run the following commands to refresh $PRG:"
    echo ""
    echo "    $ cp $PRG_ORIG $PRG"
    echo "    # setcap cap_net_raw+ep $PRG"
    echo ""
    exit
}

./$PRG $*

或者修补内核并删除检查。

(最后的选择，不推荐)。

在net/ipv4/af_inet.c中，删除读取的两行

      if (snum && snum < PROT_SOCK && !capable(CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE))
              goto out;

内核将不再检查特权端口。