改良版的@Matthew的回答。这种形式具有将临时类存储在闭包中所获得的轻微性能优势，以及可以使用一个函数创建任何类的灵活性

var applyCtor = function(){
    var tempCtor = function() {};
    return function(ctor, args){
        tempCtor.prototype = ctor.prototype;
        var instance = new tempCtor();
        ctor.prototype.constructor.apply(instance,args);
        return instance;
    }
}();

这将通过调用applyCtor(类，[arg1, arg2, argn])来使用;

同样有趣的是，如何通过使用参数来解决重用临时F()构造函数的问题。Callee，也就是创建者/工厂函数本身: http://www.dhtmlkitchen.com/?category=/JavaScript/&date=2008/05/11/&entry=Decorator-Factory-Aspect

是的，我们可以，javascript在本质上更多的是原型继承。

function Actor(name, age){
  this.name = name;
  this.age = age;
}

Actor.prototype.name = "unknown";
Actor.prototype.age = "unknown";

Actor.prototype.getName = function() {
    return this.name;
};

Actor.prototype.getAge = function() {
    return this.age;
};

当我们创建一个带有"new"的对象时，我们创建的对象继承getAge()，但如果我们使用apply(…)或call(…)来调用Actor，那么我们为"this"传递了一个对象，但我们传递的对象不会继承自Actor.prototype

除非，我们直接通过apply或调用Actor。原型但是....“this”指向“Actor”。this.name将写入:actor。prototype.name。从而影响所有用Actor创建的其他对象…因为我们覆盖的是原型而不是实例

var rajini = new Actor('Rajinikanth', 31);
console.log(rajini);
console.log(rajini.getName());
console.log(rajini.getAge());

var kamal = new Actor('kamal', 18);
console.log(kamal);
console.log(kamal.getName());
console.log(kamal.getAge());

让我们试试apply

var vijay = Actor.apply(null, ["pandaram", 33]);
if (vijay === undefined) {
    console.log("Actor(....) didn't return anything 
           since we didn't call it with new");
}

var ajith = {};
Actor.apply(ajith, ['ajith', 25]);
console.log(ajith); //Object {name: "ajith", age: 25}
try {
    ajith.getName();
} catch (E) {
    console.log("Error since we didn't inherit ajith.prototype");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //Unknown
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //Unknown

通过传递Actor。prototype to Actor.call()作为第一个参数，当Actor()函数运行时，它执行this.name=name，因为“this”将指向Actor。原型,this.name =名称;意味着Actor.prototype.name =名称;

var simbhu = Actor.apply(Actor.prototype, ['simbhu', 28]);
if (simbhu === undefined) {
    console.log("Still undefined since the function didn't return anything.");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //simbhu
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //28

var copy = Actor.prototype;
var dhanush = Actor.apply(copy, ["dhanush", 11]);
console.log(dhanush);
console.log("But now we've corrupted Parent.prototype in order to inherit");
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //11
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //dhanush

回到最初的问题，如何使用新的操作符与应用，这里是我的....

Function.prototype.new = function(){
    var constructor = this;
    function fn() {return constructor.apply(this, args)}
    var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
    fn.prototype = this.prototype;
    return new fn
};

var thalaivar = Actor.new.apply(Parent, ["Thalaivar", 30]);
console.log(thalaivar);

其实最简单的方法是:

function Something (a, b) {
  this.a = a;
  this.b = b;
}
function createSomething(){
    return Something;
}
s = new (createSomething())(1, 2); 
// s == Something {a: 1, b: 2}

如果您对基于求值的解决方案感兴趣

function createSomething() {
    var q = [];
    for(var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++)
        q.push("arguments[" + i + "]");
    return eval("new Something(" + q.join(",") + ")");
}

我遇到了这个问题，我是这样解决的:

function instantiate(ctor) {
    switch (arguments.length) {
        case 1: return new ctor();
        case 2: return new ctor(arguments[1]);
        case 3: return new ctor(arguments[1], arguments[2]);
        case 4: return new ctor(arguments[1], arguments[2], arguments[3]);
        //...
        default: throw new Error('instantiate: too many parameters');
    }
}

function Thing(a, b, c) {
    console.log(a);
    console.log(b);
    console.log(c);
}

var thing = instantiate(Thing, 'abc', 123, {x:5});

是的，这有点丑，但它解决了问题，而且非常简单。