假设你有一个Items构造函数，它吸收了你给它的所有参数:

function Items () {
    this.elems = [].slice.call(arguments);
}

Items.prototype.sum = function () {
    return this.elems.reduce(function (sum, x) { return sum + x }, 0);
};

你可以用Object.create()创建一个实例，然后用.apply()创建该实例:

var items = Object.create(Items.prototype);
Items.apply(items, [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]);

console.log(items.sum());

当运行时输出10，因为1 + 2 + 3 + 4 == 10:

$ node t.js
10

我遇到了这个问题，我是这样解决的:

function instantiate(ctor) {
    switch (arguments.length) {
        case 1: return new ctor();
        case 2: return new ctor(arguments[1]);
        case 3: return new ctor(arguments[1], arguments[2]);
        case 4: return new ctor(arguments[1], arguments[2], arguments[3]);
        //...
        default: throw new Error('instantiate: too many parameters');
    }
}

function Thing(a, b, c) {
    console.log(a);
    console.log(b);
    console.log(c);
}

var thing = instantiate(Thing, 'abc', 123, {x:5});

是的，这有点丑，但它解决了问题，而且非常简单。

从ES6开始，这可以通过扩展操作符实现，请参见https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Spread_operator#Apply_for_new

这个答案已经在https://stackoverflow.com/a/42027742/7049810评论中给出了，但似乎被大多数人忽略了

你为什么要把事情弄得这么复杂。在new之后使用匿名函数，该函数返回带有应用数组的构造函数。

function myConstructor(a,b,c){
    this.a = a;
    this.b = b;
    this.c = c;
}

var newObject = new myConstructor(1,2,3);   // {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}

var myArguments = [1,2,3];
var anotherObject = new function(){
    return myConstructor.apply(this,myArguments);
  }; // {a: 1, b: 2, c: 3}

是的，我们可以，javascript在本质上更多的是原型继承。

function Actor(name, age){
  this.name = name;
  this.age = age;
}

Actor.prototype.name = "unknown";
Actor.prototype.age = "unknown";

Actor.prototype.getName = function() {
    return this.name;
};

Actor.prototype.getAge = function() {
    return this.age;
};

当我们创建一个带有"new"的对象时，我们创建的对象继承getAge()，但如果我们使用apply(…)或call(…)来调用Actor，那么我们为"this"传递了一个对象，但我们传递的对象不会继承自Actor.prototype

除非，我们直接通过apply或调用Actor。原型但是....“this”指向“Actor”。this.name将写入:actor。prototype.name。从而影响所有用Actor创建的其他对象…因为我们覆盖的是原型而不是实例

var rajini = new Actor('Rajinikanth', 31);
console.log(rajini);
console.log(rajini.getName());
console.log(rajini.getAge());

var kamal = new Actor('kamal', 18);
console.log(kamal);
console.log(kamal.getName());
console.log(kamal.getAge());

让我们试试apply

var vijay = Actor.apply(null, ["pandaram", 33]);
if (vijay === undefined) {
    console.log("Actor(....) didn't return anything 
           since we didn't call it with new");
}

var ajith = {};
Actor.apply(ajith, ['ajith', 25]);
console.log(ajith); //Object {name: "ajith", age: 25}
try {
    ajith.getName();
} catch (E) {
    console.log("Error since we didn't inherit ajith.prototype");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //Unknown
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //Unknown

通过传递Actor。prototype to Actor.call()作为第一个参数，当Actor()函数运行时，它执行this.name=name，因为“this”将指向Actor。原型,this.name =名称;意味着Actor.prototype.name =名称;

var simbhu = Actor.apply(Actor.prototype, ['simbhu', 28]);
if (simbhu === undefined) {
    console.log("Still undefined since the function didn't return anything.");
}
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //simbhu
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //28

var copy = Actor.prototype;
var dhanush = Actor.apply(copy, ["dhanush", 11]);
console.log(dhanush);
console.log("But now we've corrupted Parent.prototype in order to inherit");
console.log(Actor.prototype.age); //11
console.log(Actor.prototype.name); //dhanush

回到最初的问题，如何使用新的操作符与应用，这里是我的....

Function.prototype.new = function(){
    var constructor = this;
    function fn() {return constructor.apply(this, args)}
    var args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);
    fn.prototype = this.prototype;
    return new fn
};

var thalaivar = Actor.new.apply(Parent, ["Thalaivar", 30]);
console.log(thalaivar);

看看CoffeeScript是如何做到的。

([a,b,c]…)

就变成:

var s;
s = (function(func, args, ctor) {
  ctor.prototype = func.prototype;
  var child = new ctor, result = func.apply(child, args);
  return Object(result) === result ? result : child;
})(Something, [a, b, c], function(){});