多年来,我一直在对所有类型的聚合查询使用GROUP BY。最近,我一直在逆向工程一些使用PARTITION BY来执行聚合的代码。
在阅读我能找到的所有关于PARTITION BY的文档时,它听起来很像GROUP BY,可能还添加了一些额外的功能。
它们是相同功能的两个版本还是完全不同的东西?
多年来,我一直在对所有类型的聚合查询使用GROUP BY。最近,我一直在逆向工程一些使用PARTITION BY来执行聚合的代码。
在阅读我能找到的所有关于PARTITION BY的文档时,它听起来很像GROUP BY,可能还添加了一些额外的功能。
它们是相同功能的两个版本还是完全不同的东西?
当前回答
假设我们在表中有14条name列的记录
在小组由
select name,count(*) as totalcount from person where name='Please fill out' group BY name;
它将给出单行计数,即14
但是在除以
select row_number() over (partition by name) as total from person where name = 'Please fill out';
它将增加14行计数
其他回答
使用GROUP BY时,生成的行通常比输入的行少。
但是,当使用PARTITION BY时,得到的行数应该与传入的行数相同。
-- BELOW IS A SAMPLE WHICH OUTLINES THE SIMPLE DIFFERENCES
-- READ IT AND THEN EXECUTE IT
-- THERE ARE THREE ROWS OF EACH COLOR INSERTED INTO THE TABLE
-- CREATE A database called testDB
-- use testDB
USE [TestDB]
GO
-- create Paints table
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Paints](
[Color] [varchar](50) NULL,
[glossLevel] [varchar](50) NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
-- Populate Table
insert into paints (color, glossLevel)
select 'red', 'eggshell'
union
select 'red', 'glossy'
union
select 'red', 'flat'
union
select 'blue', 'eggshell'
union
select 'blue', 'glossy'
union
select 'blue', 'flat'
union
select 'orange', 'glossy'
union
select 'orange', 'flat'
union
select 'orange', 'eggshell'
union
select 'green', 'eggshell'
union
select 'green', 'glossy'
union
select 'green', 'flat'
union
select 'black', 'eggshell'
union
select 'black', 'glossy'
union
select 'black', 'flat'
union
select 'purple', 'eggshell'
union
select 'purple', 'glossy'
union
select 'purple', 'flat'
union
select 'salmon', 'eggshell'
union
select 'salmon', 'glossy'
union
select 'salmon', 'flat'
/* COMPARE 'GROUP BY' color to 'OVER (PARTITION BY Color)' */
-- GROUP BY Color
-- row quantity defined by group by
-- aggregate (count(*)) defined by group by
select count(*) from paints
group by color
-- OVER (PARTITION BY... Color
-- row quantity defined by main query
-- aggregate defined by OVER-PARTITION BY
select color
, glossLevel
, count(*) OVER (Partition by color)
from paints
/* COMPARE 'GROUP BY' color, glossLevel to 'OVER (PARTITION BY Color, GlossLevel)' */
-- GROUP BY Color, GlossLevel
-- row quantity defined by GROUP BY
-- aggregate (count(*)) defined by GROUP BY
select count(*) from paints
group by color, glossLevel
-- Partition by Color, GlossLevel
-- row quantity defined by main query
-- aggregate (count(*)) defined by OVER-PARTITION BY
select color
, glossLevel
, count(*) OVER (Partition by color, glossLevel)
from paints
它提供汇总数据而不进行汇总
例如,假设我想返回销售区域的相对位置
使用PARTITION BY,我可以返回给定区域的销售额和同一行中所有销售区域的最大销售额。
这确实意味着您将有重复的数据,但它可能适合最终消费者,因为数据已经聚合,但没有数据丢失——就像GROUP BY的情况一样。
分区的 将结果集划分为多个分区。窗口函数分别应用于每个分区,并为每个分区重新启动计算。
在此链接找到:OVER子句
假设我们在表中有14条name列的记录
在小组由
select name,count(*) as totalcount from person where name='Please fill out' group BY name;
它将给出单行计数,即14
但是在除以
select row_number() over (partition by name) as total from person where name = 'Please fill out';
它将增加14行计数