对我来说，所有其他的解决方案在某些情况下都失效了。

获胜的答案如下:

http://plnkr.co/edit/6CSCA2fe4Gqt4jCBP2wu?p=preview

最终，我认为最好的解决方案是$(elem).is(':visible')——然而，这不是纯javascript。它是jquery..

所以我偷看了他们的来源，找到了我想要的

jQuery.expr.filters.visible = function( elem ) {
    return !!( elem.offsetWidth || elem.offsetHeight || elem.getClientRects().length );
};

这是来源:https://github.com/jquery/jquery/blob/master/src/css/hiddenVisibleSelectors.js

如果我们只是收集检测能见度的基本方法，让我不要忘记:

opacity > 0.01; // probably more like .1 to actually be visible, but YMMV

至于如何获取属性:

element.getAttribute(attributename);

所以，在你的例子中:

document.getElementById('snDealsPanel').getAttribute('visibility');

But wha? It doesn't work here. Look closer and you'll find that visibility is being updated not as an attribute on the element, but using the style property. This is one of many problems with trying to do what you're doing. Among others: you can't guarantee that there's actually something to see in an element, just because its visibility, display, and opacity all have the correct values. It still might lack content, or it might lack a height and width. Another object might obscure it. For more detail, a quick Google search reveals this, and even includes a library to try solving the problem. (YMMV)

看看下面的问题，它们可能是这个问题的副本，有很好的答案，包括来自强大的约翰·雷西格的一些见解。但是，您的特定用例与标准用例略有不同，因此我将避免标记:

如何判断一个DOM元素是否在当前视口中可见? 如何检查一个元素是否真的可见javascript?

(EDIT: OP SAYS HE'S SCRAPING PAGES, NOT CREATING THEM, SO BELOW ISN'T APPLICABLE) A better option? Bind the visibility of elements to model properties and always make visibility contingent on that model, much as Angular does with ng-show. You can do that using any tool you want: Angular, plain JS, whatever. Better still, you can change the DOM implementation over time, but you'll always be able to read state from the model, instead of the DOM. Reading your truth from the DOM is Bad. And slow. Much better to check the model, and trust in your implementation to ensure that the DOM state reflects the model. (And use automated testing to confirm that assumption.)

根据MDN文档，元素的offsetParent属性将在它或它的任何父元素通过display style属性被隐藏时返回null。只要确保元素不是固定的。一个脚本来检查这个，如果你没有位置:fixed;页面上的元素可能是这样的:

// Where el is the DOM element you'd like to test for visibility
function isHidden(el) {
    return (el.offsetParent === null)
}

另一方面，如果您确实有位置固定的元素可能会在此搜索中被捕获，那么您将不得不遗憾地(并且缓慢地)使用window.getComputedStyle()。这种情况下的函数可能是:

// Where el is the DOM element you'd like to test for visibility
function isHidden(el) {
    var style = window.getComputedStyle(el);
    return (style.display === 'none')
}

选项2可能更简单一点，因为它考虑了更多的边缘情况，但我打赌它也会慢很多，所以如果你不得不多次重复这个操作，最好避免它。

2021的解决方案

根据MDN文档，交互观察器异步观察目标元素与祖先元素或顶级文档视口的交集中的变化。这意味着每当元素与视口相交时，交互观察器就会触发。

截至2021年，除IE外，目前所有浏览器都支持交集观测器。

实现

const el = document.getElementById("your-target-element");
const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries) => {
    if(entries[0].isIntersecting){
         // el is visible
    } else {
         // el is not visible
    }
});

observer.observe(el); // Asynchronous call

The handler will fire when initially created. And then it will fire every time that it becomes slightly visible or becomes completely not visible. An element is deemed to be not-visible when it's not actually visible within the viewport. So if you scroll down and element goes off the screen, then the observer will trigger and the // el is not visible code will be triggered - even though the element is still "displayed" (i.e. doesn't have display:none or visibility:hidden). What matters is whether there are any pixels of the element that are actually visible within the viewport.

对我来说，所有其他的解决方案在某些情况下都失效了。

获胜的答案如下:

http://plnkr.co/edit/6CSCA2fe4Gqt4jCBP2wu?p=preview

最终，我认为最好的解决方案是$(elem).is(':visible')——然而，这不是纯javascript。它是jquery..

所以我偷看了他们的来源，找到了我想要的

jQuery.expr.filters.visible = function( elem ) {
    return !!( elem.offsetWidth || elem.offsetHeight || elem.getClientRects().length );
};

这是来源:https://github.com/jquery/jquery/blob/master/src/css/hiddenVisibleSelectors.js

如果你正在抓取网站，一个非常低效的方法对我来说是突出显示任何元素，然后截图，然后检查截图是否发生了变化。

//Screenshot

function makeSelected(element){
    let range = new Range()
    range.selectNode(element)
    let selection = window.getSelection()
    selection.removeAllRanges()
    selection.addRange(range)
}
// screenshot again and check for diff