这是一种确定所有css属性(包括可见性)的方法:

html:

<div id="element">div content</div>

css:

#element
{
visibility:hidden;
}

javascript:

var element = document.getElementById('element');
 if(element.style.visibility == 'hidden'){
alert('hidden');
}
else
{
alert('visible');
}

它适用于任何css属性，非常通用和可靠。

结合上面的几个答案:

function isVisible (ele) {
    var style = window.getComputedStyle(ele);
    return  style.width !== "0" &&
    style.height !== "0" &&
    style.opacity !== "0" &&
    style.display!=='none' &&
    style.visibility!== 'hidden';
}

就像AlexZ说的，这可能会比你的一些其他选择更慢，如果你更具体地知道你在寻找什么，但这应该抓住所有隐藏元素的主要方式。

但是，这也取决于你认为什么是可见的。例如，一个div的高度可以设置为0px，但内容仍然可见，这取决于溢出属性。或者，可以将div的内容设置为与背景相同的颜色，这样用户就不会看到它，但仍然可以在页面上显示。或者一个div可以移出屏幕或隐藏在其他div后面，或者它的内容可以是不可见的，但边界仍然可见。在一定程度上，“可见”是一个主观术语。

根据MDN文档，元素的offsetParent属性将在它或它的任何父元素通过display style属性被隐藏时返回null。只要确保元素不是固定的。一个脚本来检查这个，如果你没有位置:fixed;页面上的元素可能是这样的:

// Where el is the DOM element you'd like to test for visibility
function isHidden(el) {
    return (el.offsetParent === null)
}

另一方面，如果您确实有位置固定的元素可能会在此搜索中被捕获，那么您将不得不遗憾地(并且缓慢地)使用window.getComputedStyle()。这种情况下的函数可能是:

// Where el is the DOM element you'd like to test for visibility
function isHidden(el) {
    var style = window.getComputedStyle(el);
    return (style.display === 'none')
}

选项2可能更简单一点，因为它考虑了更多的边缘情况，但我打赌它也会慢很多，所以如果你不得不多次重复这个操作，最好避免它。

let element = document.getElementById('element');
let rect = element.getBoundingClientRect();

if(rect.top == 0 && 
  rect.bottom == 0 && 
  rect.left == 0 && 
  rect.right == 0 && 
  rect.width == 0 && 
  rect.height == 0 && 
  rect.x == 0 && 
  rect.y == 0)
{
  alert('hidden');
}
else
{
  alert('visible');
}

公认的答案对我不起作用。

2020年分解。

The (elem.offsetParent !== null) method works fine in Firefox but not in Chrome. In Chrome position: fixed will also make offsetParent return null even the element if visible in the page. User Phrogz conducted a large test (2,304 divs) on elements with varying properties to demonstrate the issue. https://stackoverflow.com/a/11639664/4481831 . Run it with multiple browsers to see the differences. Demo: //different results in Chrome and Firefox console.log(document.querySelector('#hidden1').offsetParent); //null Chrome & Firefox console.log(document.querySelector('#fixed1').offsetParent); //null in Chrome, not null in Firefox <div id="hidden1" style="display:none;"></div> <div id="fixed1" style="position:fixed;"></div> The (getComputedStyle(elem).display !== 'none') does not work because the element can be invisible because one of the parents display property is set to none, getComputedStyle will not catch that. Demo: var child1 = document.querySelector('#child1'); console.log(getComputedStyle(child1).display); //child will show "block" instead of "none" <div id="parent1" style="display:none;"> <div id="child1" style="display:block"></div> </div> The (elem.clientHeight !== 0). This method is not influenced by position: fixed and it also check if element parents are not-visible. But it has problems with simple elements that do not have a css layout and inline elements, see more here Demo: console.log(document.querySelector('#inline1').clientHeight); //zero console.log(document.querySelector('#div1').clientHeight); //not zero console.log(document.querySelector('#span1').clientHeight); //zero <div id="inline1" style="display:inline">test1 inline</div> <div id="div1">test2 div</div> <span id="span1">test3 span</span> The (elem.getClientRects().length !== 0) may seem to solve the problems of the previous 3 methods. However it has problems with elements that use CSS tricks (other then display: none) to hide in the page. Demo console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible1').getClientRects().length); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible1').clientHeight); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible2').getClientRects().length); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible2').clientHeight); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible3').getClientRects().length); console.log(document.querySelector('#notvisible3').clientHeight); <div id="notvisible1" style="height:0; overflow:hidden; background-color:red;">not visible 1</div> <div id="notvisible2" style="visibility:hidden; background-color:yellow;">not visible 2</div> <div id="notvisible3" style="opacity:0; background-color:blue;">not visible 3</div>

结论。

所以我向你们展示的是没有什么方法是完美的。要进行适当的可见性检查，必须结合使用后3种方法。

如果我们只是收集检测能见度的基本方法，让我不要忘记:

opacity > 0.01; // probably more like .1 to actually be visible, but YMMV

至于如何获取属性:

element.getAttribute(attributename);

所以，在你的例子中:

document.getElementById('snDealsPanel').getAttribute('visibility');

But wha? It doesn't work here. Look closer and you'll find that visibility is being updated not as an attribute on the element, but using the style property. This is one of many problems with trying to do what you're doing. Among others: you can't guarantee that there's actually something to see in an element, just because its visibility, display, and opacity all have the correct values. It still might lack content, or it might lack a height and width. Another object might obscure it. For more detail, a quick Google search reveals this, and even includes a library to try solving the problem. (YMMV)

看看下面的问题，它们可能是这个问题的副本，有很好的答案，包括来自强大的约翰·雷西格的一些见解。但是，您的特定用例与标准用例略有不同，因此我将避免标记:

如何判断一个DOM元素是否在当前视口中可见? 如何检查一个元素是否真的可见javascript?

(EDIT: OP SAYS HE'S SCRAPING PAGES, NOT CREATING THEM, SO BELOW ISN'T APPLICABLE) A better option? Bind the visibility of elements to model properties and always make visibility contingent on that model, much as Angular does with ng-show. You can do that using any tool you want: Angular, plain JS, whatever. Better still, you can change the DOM implementation over time, but you'll always be able to read state from the model, instead of the DOM. Reading your truth from the DOM is Bad. And slow. Much better to check the model, and trust in your implementation to ensure that the DOM state reflects the model. (And use automated testing to confirm that assumption.)