来自Jason Bunting的regexIndexOf可以更简单地反向，并且仍然支持UTF8字符:

function regexLastIndexOf(string, regex, startpos=0) {
    return text.length - regexIndexOf([...text].reverse().join(""), regex, startpos) - 1;
}

对于具有稀疏匹配的数据，使用字符串。跨浏览器搜索速度最快。它每次迭代都会重新切片字符串:

function lastIndexOfSearch(string, regex, index) {
  if(index === 0 || index)
     string = string.slice(0, Math.max(0,index));
  var idx;
  var offset = -1;
  while ((idx = string.search(regex)) !== -1) {
    offset += idx + 1;
    string = string.slice(idx + 1);
  }
  return offset;
}

对于密集的数据，我做了这个。与执行方法相比，它比较复杂，但对于密集数据，它比我尝试过的其他方法快2-10倍，比公认的解决方案快100倍左右。要点如下:

It calls exec on the regex passed in once to verify there is a match or quit early. I do this using (?= in a similar method, but on IE checking with exec is dramatically faster. It constructs and caches a modified regex in the format '(r).(?!.?r)' The new regex is executed and the results from either that exec, or the first exec, are returned; function lastIndexOfGroupSimple(string, regex, index) { if (index === 0 || index) string = string.slice(0, Math.max(0, index + 1)); regex.lastIndex = 0; var lastRegex, index flags = 'g' + (regex.multiline ? 'm' : '') + (regex.ignoreCase ? 'i' : ''), key = regex.source + '$' + flags, match = regex.exec(string); if (!match) return -1; if (lastIndexOfGroupSimple.cache === undefined) lastIndexOfGroupSimple.cache = {}; lastRegex = lastIndexOfGroupSimple.cache[key]; if (!lastRegex) lastIndexOfGroupSimple.cache[key] = lastRegex = new RegExp('.*(' + regex.source + ')(?!.*?' + regex.source + ')', flags); index = match.index; lastRegex.lastIndex = match.index; return (match = lastRegex.exec(string)) ? lastRegex.lastIndex - match[1].length : index; };

方法的jsPerf

我不明白上面这些测试的目的。需要正则表达式的情况是不可能与调用indexOf进行比较的，我认为这是首先创建该方法的目的。为了让测试通过，使用'xxx+(?!x)'比调整regex迭代的方式更有意义。

结合已经提到的一些方法(indexOf显然相当简单)，我认为这些函数将达到目的:

function regexIndexOf(string, regex, startpos) {
    var indexOf = string.substring(startpos || 0).search(regex);
    return (indexOf >= 0) ? (indexOf + (startpos || 0)) : indexOf;
}

function regexLastIndexOf(string, regex, startpos) {
    regex = (regex.global) ? regex : new RegExp(regex.source, "g" + (regex.ignoreCase ? "i" : "") + (regex.multiLine ? "m" : ""));
    if(typeof (startpos) == "undefined") {
        startpos = string.length;
    } else if(startpos < 0) {
        startpos = 0;
    }
    var stringToWorkWith = string.substring(0, startpos + 1);
    var lastIndexOf = -1;
    var nextStop = 0;
    while((result = regex.exec(stringToWorkWith)) != null) {
        lastIndexOf = result.index;
        regex.lastIndex = ++nextStop;
    }
    return lastIndexOf;
}

更新:编辑regexLastIndexOf()，所以它似乎是模仿lastIndexOf()现在。请让我知道它是否仍然失败，在什么情况下。

更新:通过本页评论和我自己的所有测试。当然，这并不意味着它是防弹的。感谢任何反馈。

来自Jason Bunting的regexIndexOf可以更简单地反向，并且仍然支持UTF8字符:

function regexLastIndexOf(string, regex, startpos=0) {
    return text.length - regexIndexOf([...text].reverse().join(""), regex, startpos) - 1;
}

我使用string .prototype.match(regex)，它返回一个字符串数组，所有找到的匹配给定的正则表达式在字符串(更多信息见这里):

function getLastIndex(text, regex, limit = text.length) { const matches = text.match(regex); // no matches found if (!matches) { return -1; } // matches found but first index greater than limit if (text.indexOf(matches[0] + matches[0].length) > limit) { return -1; } // reduce index until smaller than limit let i = matches.length - 1; let index = text.lastIndexOf(matches[i]); while (index > limit && i >= 0) { i--; index = text.lastIndexOf(matches[i]); } return index > limit ? -1 : index; } // expect -1 as first index === 14 console.log(getLastIndex('First Sentence. Last Sentence. Unfinished', /\. /g, 10)); // expect 29 console.log(getLastIndex('First Sentence. Last Sentence. Unfinished', /\. /g));

让正则表达式;//你的RegExp 加勒比海盗。map(x => !!x. tostring ().match(regExp)).indexOf(true)