关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
关于使用fs.readdir进行异步目录搜索有什么想法吗?我意识到我们可以引入递归,并调用read目录函数来读取下一个目录,但我有点担心它不是异步的…
什么好主意吗?我已经看了node-walk,它很棒,但它不能像readdir那样只给我数组中的文件。虽然
寻找这样的输出…
['file1.txt', 'file2.txt', 'dir/file3.txt']
当前回答
下面是完整的工作代码。按您的要求。您可以递归地获取所有文件和文件夹。
var recur = function(dir) {
fs.readdir(dir,function(err,list){
list.forEach(function(file){
var file2 = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file2,function(err,stats){
if(stats.isDirectory()) {
recur(file2);
}
else {
console.log(file2);
}
})
})
});
};
recur(path);
在路径中给出你想要搜索的目录路径,如"c:\test"
其他回答
使用async/await,这应该工作:
const FS = require('fs');
const readDir = promisify(FS.readdir);
const fileStat = promisify(FS.stat);
async function getFiles(dir) {
let files = await readDir(dir);
let result = files.map(file => {
let path = Path.join(dir,file);
return fileStat(path).then(stat => stat.isDirectory() ? getFiles(path) : path);
});
return flatten(await Promise.all(result));
}
function flatten(arr) {
return Array.prototype.concat(...arr);
}
你可以用蓝鸟。许诺或许诺:
/**
* Returns a function that will wrap the given `nodeFunction`. Instead of taking a callback, the returned function will return a promise whose fate is decided by the callback behavior of the given node function. The node function should conform to node.js convention of accepting a callback as last argument and calling that callback with error as the first argument and success value on the second argument.
*
* @param {Function} nodeFunction
* @returns {Function}
*/
module.exports = function promisify(nodeFunction) {
return function(...args) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
nodeFunction.call(this, ...args, (err, data) => {
if(err) {
reject(err);
} else {
resolve(data);
}
})
});
};
};
Node 8+内置了Promisify
请参阅我对生成器方法的其他回答,它可以更快地得到结果。
There are basically two ways of accomplishing this. In an async environment you'll notice that there are two kinds of loops: serial and parallel. A serial loop waits for one iteration to complete before it moves onto the next iteration - this guarantees that every iteration of the loop completes in order. In a parallel loop, all the iterations are started at the same time, and one may complete before another, however, it is much faster than a serial loop. So in this case, it's probably better to use a parallel loop because it doesn't matter what order the walk completes in, just as long as it completes and returns the results (unless you want them in order).
一个平行循环看起来是这样的:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
var results = [];
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) return done(err);
var pending = list.length;
if (!pending) return done(null, results);
list.forEach(function(file) {
file = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
walk(file, function(err, res) {
results = results.concat(res);
if (!--pending) done(null, results);
});
} else {
results.push(file);
if (!--pending) done(null, results);
}
});
});
});
};
一个串行循环看起来像这样:
var fs = require('fs');
var path = require('path');
var walk = function(dir, done) {
var results = [];
fs.readdir(dir, function(err, list) {
if (err) return done(err);
var i = 0;
(function next() {
var file = list[i++];
if (!file) return done(null, results);
file = path.resolve(dir, file);
fs.stat(file, function(err, stat) {
if (stat && stat.isDirectory()) {
walk(file, function(err, res) {
results = results.concat(res);
next();
});
} else {
results.push(file);
next();
}
});
})();
});
};
并且在你的主目录中测试它(警告:如果你的主目录中有很多东西,结果列表将会非常大):
walk(process.env.HOME, function(err, results) {
if (err) throw err;
console.log(results);
});
编辑:改进的示例。
独立承诺实现
在这个例子中,我使用的是when.js承诺库。
var fs = require('fs')
, path = require('path')
, when = require('when')
, nodefn = require('when/node/function');
function walk (directory, includeDir) {
var results = [];
return when.map(nodefn.call(fs.readdir, directory), function(file) {
file = path.join(directory, file);
return nodefn.call(fs.stat, file).then(function(stat) {
if (stat.isFile()) { return results.push(file); }
if (includeDir) { results.push(file + path.sep); }
return walk(file, includeDir).then(function(filesInDir) {
results = results.concat(filesInDir);
});
});
}).then(function() {
return results;
});
};
walk(__dirname).then(function(files) {
console.log(files);
}).otherwise(function(error) {
console.error(error.stack || error);
});
我包含了一个可选参数includeDir,如果设置为true,它将在文件列表中包含目录。
a .看一下文件模块。它有一个叫walk的函数:
文件。步行(开始,回调) 导航文件树,为每个目录调用回调,传入 (null, dirPath, dirs, files)。
这可能是为你准备的!是的,它是异步的。但是,如果需要的话,我认为您必须自己聚合完整的路径。
B.另一种选择,甚至是我的最爱之一:使用unix find来查找。为什么要再做一件已经编程好的事情呢?也许不是你真正需要的,但仍然值得一试:
var execFile = require('child_process').execFile;
execFile('find', [ 'somepath/' ], function(err, stdout, stderr) {
var file_list = stdout.split('\n');
/* now you've got a list with full path file names */
});
Find有一个很好的内置缓存机制,使得后续搜索非常快,只要只有少数文件夹被更改。
对于Node 10.3+,这里是一个For -await解决方案:
#!/usr/bin/env node
const FS = require('fs');
const Util = require('util');
const readDir = Util.promisify(FS.readdir);
const Path = require('path');
async function* readDirR(path) {
const entries = await readDir(path,{withFileTypes:true});
for(let entry of entries) {
const fullPath = Path.join(path,entry.name);
if(entry.isDirectory()) {
yield* readDirR(fullPath);
} else {
yield fullPath;
}
}
}
async function main() {
const start = process.hrtime.bigint();
for await(const file of readDirR('/mnt/home/media/Unsorted')) {
console.log(file);
}
console.log((process.hrtime.bigint()-start)/1000000n);
}
main().catch(err => {
console.error(err);
});
这种解决方案的好处是,您可以立即开始处理结果;例如,读取媒体目录中的所有文件需要12秒,但如果我这样做,我可以在几毫秒内得到第一个结果。