如果你想pickle你修改后的字典，你需要添加几个状态方法到上面的答案:

class DotDict(dict):
    """dot.notation access to dictionary attributes"""
    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        return self.get(attr)
    __setattr__= dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__= dict.__delitem__

    def __getstate__(self):
        return self

    def __setstate__(self, state):
        self.update(state)
        self.__dict__ = self

这也适用于嵌套字典，并确保后面追加的字典行为相同:

class DotDict(dict):

    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(*args, **kwargs)
        # Recursively turn nested dicts into DotDicts
        for key, value in self.items():
            if type(value) is dict:
                self[key] = DotDict(value)

    def __setitem__(self, key, item):
        if type(item) is dict:
            item = DotDict(item)
        super().__setitem__(key, item)

    __setattr__ = __setitem__
    __getattr__ = dict.__getitem__

我最近遇到了“Box”库，它也做同样的事情。

安装命令:pip install python-box

例子:

from box import Box

mydict = {"key1":{"v1":0.375,
                    "v2":0.625},
          "key2":0.125,
          }
mydict = Box(mydict)

print(mydict.key1.v1)

我发现它比其他现有的库(如dotmap)更有效，当你有大量嵌套字典时，dotmap会产生python递归错误。

链接到图书馆和详细信息:https://pypi.org/project/python-box/

I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。

另一件需要注意的事情是，这个实现非常简单，并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。

我试了一下:

class dotdict(dict):
    def __getattr__(self, name):
        return self[name]

你也可以尝试__getattribute__。

使每个字典都是一种类型的dotdict就足够了，如果你想从多层字典初始化它，也可以尝试实现__init__。

def dict_to_object(dick):
    # http://stackoverflow.com/a/1305663/968442

    class Struct:
        def __init__(self, **entries):
            self.__dict__.update(entries)

    return Struct(**dick)

如果一个人决定永久地将字典转换为对象，这应该做到。您可以在访问之前创建一个丢弃对象。

d = dict_to_object(d)