使用__getattr__，非常简单，适用于 Python 3.4.3

class myDict(dict):
    def __getattr__(self,val):
        return self[val]


blockBody=myDict()
blockBody['item1']=10000
blockBody['item2']="StackOverflow"
print(blockBody.item1)
print(blockBody.item2)

输出:

10000
StackOverflow

通过pip安装dotmap

pip install dotmap

它能做你想让它做的所有事情，并继承dict的子类，所以它的操作就像一个普通的字典:

from dotmap import DotMap

m = DotMap()
m.hello = 'world'
m.hello
m.hello += '!'
# m.hello and m['hello'] now both return 'world!'
m.val = 5
m.val2 = 'Sam'

最重要的是，你可以将它转换为dict对象:

d = m.toDict()
m = DotMap(d) # automatic conversion in constructor

这意味着如果你想访问的东西已经是字典形式的，你可以把它转换成DotMap来方便访问:

import json
jsonDict = json.loads(text)
data = DotMap(jsonDict)
print data.location.city

最后，它会自动创建新的子DotMap实例，你可以这样做:

m = DotMap()
m.people.steve.age = 31

与Bunch的比较

完全公开:我是DotMap的创造者。我创建它是因为Bunch缺少这些功能

记住添加的顺序项并按此顺序迭代 自动创建子DotMap，当你有很多层次结构时，这节省了时间，并使代码更干净 从字典构造并递归地将所有子字典实例转换为DotMap

这是我从很久以前的一个项目里挖出来的。它可能还可以再优化一点，但就是这样了。

class DotNotation(dict):
    
    __setattr__= dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__= dict.__delitem__

    def __init__(self, data):
        if isinstance(data, str):
            data = json.loads(data)
    
        for name, value in data.items():
            setattr(self, name, self._wrap(value))

    def __getattr__(self, attr):
        def _traverse(obj, attr):
            if self._is_indexable(obj):
                try:
                    return obj[int(attr)]
                except:
                    return None
            elif isinstance(obj, dict):
                return obj.get(attr, None)
            else:
                return attr
        if '.' in attr:
            return reduce(_traverse, attr.split('.'), self)
        return self.get(attr, None)

    def _wrap(self, value):
        if self._is_indexable(value):
            # (!) recursive (!)
            return type(value)([self._wrap(v) for v in value])
        elif isinstance(value, dict):
            return DotNotation(value)
        else:
            return value
    
    @staticmethod
    def _is_indexable(obj):
        return isinstance(obj, (tuple, list, set, frozenset))


if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_dict = {
        "dimensions": {
            "length": "112",
            "width": "103",
            "height": "42"
        },
        "meta_data": [
            {
                "id": 11089769,
                "key": "imported_gallery_files",
                "value": [
                    "https://example.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/unnamed-3.jpg",
                    "https://example.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/unnamed-2.jpg",
                    "https://example.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/unnamed-4.jpg"
                ]
            }
        ]
    }
    dotted_dict = DotNotation(test_dict)
    print(dotted_dict.dimensions.length) # => '112'
    print(getattr(dotted_dict, 'dimensions.length')) # => '112'
    print(dotted_dict.meta_data[0].key) # => 'imported_gallery_files'
    print(getattr(dotted_dict, 'meta_data.0.key')) # => 'imported_gallery_files'
    print(dotted_dict.meta_data[0].value) # => ['link1','link2','link2']
    print(getattr(dotted_dict, 'meta_data.0.value')) # => ['link1','link2','link3']
    print(dotted_dict.meta_data[0].value[2]) # => 'link3'
    print(getattr(dotted_dict, 'meta_data.0.value.2')) # => 'link3'

这是我对@derek73的回答。我用字典。__getitem__作为__getattr__，因此它仍然抛出KeyError，并且im重命名字典公共方法以“”前缀(“”包围导致特殊方法名称冲突，如__get__将被视为一个描述符方法)。无论如何，由于关键的dict基方法，您无法将键作为属性获得完全清晰的命名空间，因此解决方案并不完美，但您可以拥有键属性，如get, pop, items等。

class DotDictMeta(type):                                                          
    def __new__(                                                                  
        cls,                                                                      
        name,                                                                     
        bases,                                                                    
        attrs,                                         
        rename_method=lambda n: f'__{n}__',                            
        **custom_methods,                                                         
    ):                                                                            
        d = dict                                                                  
        attrs.update(                                                             
            cls.get_hidden_or_renamed_methods(rename_method),           
            __getattr__=d.__getitem__,                                            
            __setattr__=d.__setitem__,                                            
            __delattr__=d.__delitem__,                                            
            **custom_methods,                                                     
        )                                                                         
        return super().__new__(cls, name, bases, attrs)                           
                                                                                  
    def __init__(self, name, bases, attrs, **_):                                  
        super().__init__(name, bases, attrs)                                      
                                                                                  
    @property                                                                     
    def attribute_error(self):                                                    
        raise AttributeError                                                      
                                                                                  
    @classmethod                                                                  
    def get_hidden_or_renamed_methods(cls, rename_method=None):                  
        public_methods = tuple(                                                   
            i for i in dict.__dict__.items() if not i[0].startswith('__')         
        )                                                                         
        error = cls.attribute_error                                               
        hidden_methods = ((k, error) for k, v in public_methods)                  
        yield from hidden_methods                                                 
        if rename_method:                                                       
            renamed_methods = ((rename_method(k), v) for k, v in public_methods) 
            yield from renamed_methods                                             
                                                                                  
                                                                                  
class DotDict(dict, metaclass=DotDictMeta):                                       
    pass  

                                                                    
                                                                              

你可以从DotDict命名空间中删除dict方法，并继续使用dict类方法，当你想操作其他dict实例并希望使用相同的方法而不需要额外检查它是否为DotDict时，它也很有用。

dct = dict(a=1)
dot_dct = DotDict(b=2)
foo = {c: i for i, c in enumerate('xyz')}
for d in (dct, dot_dct):
    # you would have to use dct.update and dot_dct.__update methods
    dict.update(d, foo)
    
assert dict.get(dot, 'foo', 0) is 0

@derek73的答案非常简洁，但它不能被pickle或(深度)复制，并且它在缺少键时返回None。下面的代码修复了这个问题。

编辑:我没有看到上面的答案解决了完全相同的问题(点赞)。我把答案留在这里供参考。

class dotdict(dict):
    __setattr__ = dict.__setitem__
    __delattr__ = dict.__delitem__

    def __getattr__(self, name):
        try:
            return self[name]
        except KeyError:
            raise AttributeError(name)

I ended up trying BOTH the AttrDict and the Bunch libraries and found them to be way to slow for my uses. After a friend and I looked into it, we found that the main method for writing these libraries results in the library aggressively recursing through a nested object and making copies of the dictionary object throughout. With this in mind, we made two key changes. 1) We made attributes lazy-loaded 2) instead of creating copies of a dictionary object, we create copies of a light-weight proxy object. This is the final implementation. The performance increase of using this code is incredible. When using AttrDict or Bunch, these two libraries alone consumed 1/2 and 1/3 respectively of my request time(what!?). This code reduced that time to almost nothing(somewhere in the range of 0.5ms). This of course depends on your needs, but if you are using this functionality quite a bit in your code, definitely go with something simple like this.

class DictProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    def __getattr__(self, key):
        try:
            return wrap(getattr(self.obj, key))
        except AttributeError:
            try:
                return self[key]
            except KeyError:
                raise AttributeError(key)

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # items(), iteritems() and __len__

class ListProxy(object):
    def __init__(self, obj):
        self.obj = obj

    def __getitem__(self, key):
        return wrap(self.obj[key])

    # you probably also want to proxy important list properties along like
    # __iter__ and __len__

def wrap(value):
    if isinstance(value, dict):
        return DictProxy(value)
    if isinstance(value, (tuple, list)):
        return ListProxy(value)
    return value

参见https://stackoverflow.com/users/704327/michael-merickel的原始实现。

另一件需要注意的事情是，这个实现非常简单，并且没有实现您可能需要的所有方法。您需要根据需要在DictProxy或ListProxy对象上写入这些内容。