Powershell 7有这个功能。

PS C:\Users\js> 0 ? 'yes' : 'no'
no
PS C:\Users\js> 1 ? 'yes' : 'no'
yes

我能够想出的最接近PowerShell的构造是:

@({'condition is false'},{'condition is true'})[$condition]

根据这篇PowerShell博客文章，你可以创建一个别名来定义?:operator:

set-alias ?: Invoke-Ternary -Option AllScope -Description "PSCX filter alias"
filter Invoke-Ternary ([scriptblock]$decider, [scriptblock]$ifTrue, [scriptblock]$ifFalse) 
{
   if (&$decider) { 
      &$ifTrue
   } else { 
      &$ifFalse 
   }
}

像这样使用它:

$total = ($quantity * $price ) * (?:  {$quantity -le 10} {.9} {.75})

由于三元操作符通常在赋值时使用，因此它应该返回一个值。这是可行的方法:

$var=@("value if false","value if true")[[byte](condition)]

愚蠢，但有效。此外，这种结构可以用于快速将int转换为另一个值，只需添加数组元素并指定一个返回基于0的非负值的表达式。

如果你只是在寻找一种语法上简单的方法来基于布尔条件赋值/返回一个字符串或数字，你可以使用这样的乘法运算符:

"Condition is "+("true"*$condition)+("false"*!$condition)
(12.34*$condition)+(56.78*!$condition)

如果你只对正确的结果感兴趣，你可以完全忽略错误的部分(反之亦然)，例如一个简单的评分系统:

$isTall = $true
$isDark = $false
$isHandsome = $true

$score = (2*$isTall)+(4*$isDark)+(10*$isHandsome)
"Score = $score"
# or
# "Score = $((2*$isTall)+(4*$isDark)+(10*$isHandsome))"

注意，布尔值不应该是乘法运算中的前项，即$condition*"true"等将不起作用。

下面是另一种自定义函数方法:

function Test-TernaryOperatorCondition {
    [CmdletBinding()]
    param (
        [Parameter(ValueFromPipeline = $true, Mandatory = $true)]
        [bool]$ConditionResult
        ,
        [Parameter(Mandatory = $true, Position = 0)]
        [PSObject]$ValueIfTrue
        ,
        [Parameter(Mandatory = $true, Position = 1)]
        [ValidateSet(':')]
        [char]$Colon
        ,
        [Parameter(Mandatory = $true, Position = 2)]
        [PSObject]$ValueIfFalse
    )
    process {
        if ($ConditionResult) {
            $ValueIfTrue
        }
        else {
            $ValueIfFalse
        }
    }
}
set-alias -Name '???' -Value 'Test-TernaryOperatorCondition'

例子

1 -eq 1 |??? 'match' : 'nomatch'
1 -eq 2 |??? 'match' : 'nomatch'

差异的解释

Why is it 3 question marks instead of 1? The ? character is already an alias for Where-Object. ?? is used in other languages as a null coalescing operator, and I wanted to avoid confusion. Why do we need the pipe before the command? Since I'm utilising the pipeline to evaluate this, we still need this character to pipe the condition into our function What happens if I pass in an array? We get a result for each value; i.e. -2..2 |??? 'match' : 'nomatch' gives: match, match, nomatch, match, match (i.e. since any non-zero int evaluates to true; whilst zero evaluates to false). If you don't want that, convert the array to a bool; ([bool](-2..2)) |??? 'match' : 'nomatch' (or simply: [bool](-2..2) |??? 'match' : 'nomatch')