我正在使用Redux进行状态管理。 如何将存储重置为初始状态?
例如,假设我有两个用户帐户(u1和u2)。 想象下面的一系列事件:
用户u1登录到应用程序并做了一些事情,所以我们在存储中缓存一些数据。 用户u1退出。 用户u2无需刷新浏览器即可登录应用。
此时,缓存的数据将与u1关联,我想清理它。
当第一个用户注销时,如何将Redux存储重置为初始状态?
我正在使用Redux进行状态管理。 如何将存储重置为初始状态?
例如,假设我有两个用户帐户(u1和u2)。 想象下面的一系列事件:
用户u1登录到应用程序并做了一些事情,所以我们在存储中缓存一些数据。 用户u1退出。 用户u2无需刷新浏览器即可登录应用。
此时,缓存的数据将与u1关联,我想清理它。
当第一个用户注销时,如何将Redux存储重置为初始状态?
当前回答
结合Dan Abramov的回答,Ryan Irilli的回答和Rob Moorman的回答,来解释保持路由器状态和初始化状态树中的其他所有东西,我最终得到了这样的答案:
const rootReducer = (state, action) => appReducer(action.type === LOGOUT ? {
...appReducer({}, {}),
router: state && state.router || {}
} : state, action);
其他回答
NGRX4更新
如果您正在迁移到NGRX 4,您可能已经从迁移指南中注意到用于组合reducer的rootreducer方法已经被ActionReducerMap方法所取代。起初,这种新的做事方式可能会使重置状态成为一个挑战。它实际上很简单,但这样做的方式已经改变了。
这个解决方案的灵感来自NGRX4 Github文档的元还原器API部分。
首先,让我们假设你正在使用NGRX的新ActionReducerMap选项像这样组合你的reducer:
//index.reducer.ts
export const reducers: ActionReducerMap<State> = {
auth: fromAuth.reducer,
layout: fromLayout.reducer,
users: fromUsers.reducer,
networks: fromNetworks.reducer,
routingDisplay: fromRoutingDisplay.reducer,
routing: fromRouting.reducer,
routes: fromRoutes.reducer,
routesFilter: fromRoutesFilter.reducer,
params: fromParams.reducer
}
现在,假设你想从app。module内部重置状态
//app.module.ts
import { IndexReducer } from './index.reducer';
import { StoreModule, ActionReducer, MetaReducer } from '@ngrx/store';
...
export function debug(reducer: ActionReducer<any>): ActionReducer<any> {
return function(state, action) {
switch (action.type) {
case fromAuth.LOGOUT:
console.log("logout action");
state = undefined;
}
return reducer(state, action);
}
}
export const metaReducers: MetaReducer<any>[] = [debug];
@NgModule({
imports: [
...
StoreModule.forRoot(reducers, { metaReducers}),
...
]
})
export class AppModule { }
这基本上是用NGRX 4达到同样效果的一种方法。
使用Redux Toolkit和/或Typescript:
const appReducer = combineReducers({
/* your app’s top-level reducers */
});
const rootReducer = (
state: ReturnType<typeof appReducer>,
action: AnyAction
) => {
/* if you are using RTK, you can import your action and use it's type property instead of the literal definition of the action */
if (action.type === logout.type) {
return appReducer(undefined, { type: undefined });
}
return appReducer(state, action);
};
丹·阿布拉莫夫的回答帮我破案了。然而,我遇到了一个案例,并不是整个州都需要清理。所以我是这样做的:
const combinedReducer = combineReducers({
// my reducers
});
const rootReducer = (state, action) => {
if (action.type === RESET_REDUX_STATE) {
// clear everything but keep the stuff we want to be preserved ..
delete state.something;
delete state.anotherThing;
}
return combinedReducer(state, action);
}
export default rootReducer;
我已经创建了清除状态的操作。因此,当我分派登出动作创建者时,我也分派动作来清除状态。
用户记录动作
export const clearUserRecord = () => ({
type: CLEAR_USER_RECORD
});
注销操作创建器
export const logoutUser = () => {
return dispatch => {
dispatch(requestLogout())
dispatch(receiveLogout())
localStorage.removeItem('auth_token')
dispatch({ type: 'CLEAR_USER_RECORD' })
}
};
减速机
const userRecords = (state = {isFetching: false,
userRecord: [], message: ''}, action) => {
switch (action.type) {
case REQUEST_USER_RECORD:
return { ...state,
isFetching: true}
case RECEIVE_USER_RECORD:
return { ...state,
isFetching: false,
userRecord: action.user_record}
case USER_RECORD_ERROR:
return { ...state,
isFetching: false,
message: action.message}
case CLEAR_USER_RECORD:
return {...state,
isFetching: false,
message: '',
userRecord: []}
default:
return state
}
};
我不确定这是否是最佳的?
对我来说,最好的工作是设置initialState而不是state:
const reducer = createReducer(initialState,
on(proofActions.cleanAdditionalInsuredState, (state, action) => ({
...initialState
})),