可变上下文状态

简单的(但不优雅且容易出错)解决方案是使用更高范围的变量(链中的所有回调都可以访问)，并在获得结果值时将结果值写入它们:

function getExample() {
    var resultA;
    return promiseA(…).then(function(_resultA) {
        resultA = _resultA;
        // some processing
        return promiseB(…);
    }).then(function(resultB) {
        // more processing
        return // something using both resultA and resultB
    });
}

人们也可以使用一个(初始为空的)对象来代替许多变量，结果将作为动态创建的属性存储在对象上。

这个解决方案有几个缺点:

Mutable state is ugly, and global variables are evil. This pattern doesn't work across function boundaries, modularising the functions is harder as their declarations must not leave the shared scope The scope of the variables does not prevent to access them before they are initialized. This is especially likely for complex promise constructions (loops, branching, excptions) where race conditions might happen. Passing state explicitly, a declarative design that promises encourage, forces a cleaner coding style which can prevent this. One must choose the scope for those shared variables correctly. It needs to be local to the executed function to prevent race conditions between multiple parallel invocations, as would be the case if, for example, state was stored on an instance.

Bluebird库鼓励使用传递的对象，使用bind()方法将上下文对象分配给承诺链。每个回调函数都可以通过不可用的this关键字访问它。虽然对象属性比变量更容易出现无法检测到的错别字，但该模式相当聪明:

function getExample() {
    return promiseA(…)
    .bind({}) // Bluebird only!
    .then(function(resultA) {
        this.resultA = resultA;
        // some processing
        return promiseB(…);
    }).then(function(resultB) {
        // more processing
        return // something using both this.resultA and resultB
    }).bind(); // don't forget to unbind the object if you don't want the
               // caller to access it
}

这种方法可以很容易地在不支持.bind的promise库中模拟(尽管以一种更详细的方式，并且不能在表达式中使用):

function getExample() {
    var ctx = {};
    return promiseA(…)
    .then(function(resultA) {
        this.resultA = resultA;
        // some processing
        return promiseB(…);
    }.bind(ctx)).then(function(resultB) {
        // more processing
        return // something using both this.resultA and resultB
    }.bind(ctx));
}

我不打算在我自己的代码中使用这种模式，因为我不太喜欢使用全局变量。然而，在紧要关头它还是有用的。

用户是一个承诺的猫鼬模型。

var globalVar = '';

User.findAsync({}).then(function(users){
  globalVar = users;
}).then(function(){
  console.log(globalVar);
});

对“可变上下文状态”不那么苛刻的解释

对于您提出的问题，使用局部作用域对象来收集承诺链中的中间结果是一种合理的方法。考虑下面的代码片段:

function getExample(){
    //locally scoped
    const results = {};
    return promiseA(paramsA).then(function(resultA){
        results.a = resultA;
        return promiseB(paramsB);
    }).then(function(resultB){
        results.b = resultB;
        return promiseC(paramsC);
    }).then(function(resultC){
        //Resolve with composite of all promises
        return Promise.resolve(results.a + results.b + resultC);
    }).catch(function(error){
        return Promise.reject(error);
    });
}

Global variables are bad, so this solution uses a locally scoped variable which causes no harm. It is only accessible within the function. Mutable state is ugly, but this does not mutate state in an ugly manner. The ugly mutable state traditionally refers to modifying the state of function arguments or global variables, but this approach simply modifies the state of a locally scoped variable that exists for the sole purpose of aggregating promise results...a variable that will die a simple death once the promise resolves. Intermediate promises are not prevented from accessing the state of the results object, but this does not introduce some scary scenario where one of the promises in the chain will go rogue and sabotage your results. The responsibility of setting the values in each step of the promise is confined to this function and the overall result will either be correct or incorrect...it will not be some bug that will crop up years later in production (unless you intend it to!) This does not introduce a race condition scenario that would arise from parallel invocation because a new instance of the results variable is created for every invocation of the getExample function.

示例在jsfiddle上可用

这几天，我也遇到了一些像你一样的问题。最后，我用这个问题找到了一个很好的解决方案，它简单易懂。我希望这能帮助到你。

根据how-to-chain-javascript-promises

好的，让我们看看代码:

const firstPromise = () => {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => {
            console.log('first promise is completed');
            resolve({data: '123'});
        }, 2000);
    });
};

const secondPromise = (someStuff) => {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => {
            console.log('second promise is completed');
            resolve({newData: `${someStuff.data} some more data`});
        }, 2000);
    });
};

const thirdPromise = (someStuff) => {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => {
            console.log('third promise is completed');
            resolve({result: someStuff});
        }, 2000);
    });
};

firstPromise()
    .then(secondPromise)
    .then(thirdPromise)
    .then(data => {
        console.log(data);
    });

解决方案:

你可以使用'bind'显式地将中间值放在任何后来的'then'函数的作用域中。这是一个很好的解决方案，它不需要改变promise的工作方式，只需要一两行代码来传播这些值，就像已经传播错误一样。

下面是一个完整的例子:

// Get info asynchronously from a server
function pGetServerInfo()
    {
    // then value: "server info"
    } // pGetServerInfo

// Write into a file asynchronously
function pWriteFile(path,string)
    {
    // no then value
    } // pWriteFile

// The heart of the solution: Write formatted info into a log file asynchronously,
// using the pGetServerInfo and pWriteFile operations
function pLogInfo(localInfo)
    {
    var scope={localInfo:localInfo}; // Create an explicit scope object
    var thenFunc=p2.bind(scope); // Create a temporary function with this scope
    return (pGetServerInfo().then(thenFunc)); // Do the next 'then' in the chain
    } // pLogInfo

// Scope of this 'then' function is {localInfo:localInfo}
function p2(serverInfo)
    {
    // Do the final 'then' in the chain: Writes "local info, server info"
    return pWriteFile('log',this.localInfo+','+serverInfo);
    } // p2

该解决方案的调用方式如下:

pLogInfo("local info").then().catch(err);

(注意:这个解决方案的一个更复杂和完整的版本已经测试过了，但没有这个示例版本，所以它可能有一个bug。)

同步检查

将稍后需要的承诺值分配给变量，然后通过同步检查获得它们的值。这个例子使用了bluebird的.value()方法，但是很多库都提供了类似的方法。

function getExample() {
    var a = promiseA(…);

    return a.then(function() {
        // some processing
        return promiseB(…);
    }).then(function(resultB) {
        // a is guaranteed to be fulfilled here so we can just retrieve its
        // value synchronously
        var aValue = a.value();
    });
}

这可以用于任意多的值:

function getExample() {
    var a = promiseA(…);

    var b = a.then(function() {
        return promiseB(…)
    });

    var c = b.then(function() {
        return promiseC(…);
    });

    var d = c.then(function() {
        return promiseD(…);
    });

    return d.then(function() {
        return a.value() + b.value() + c.value() + d.value();
    });
}