我将代码重构为承诺,并构建了一个奇妙的长而平坦的承诺链,由多个.then()回调组成。最后我想返回一些复合值,并需要访问多个中间承诺结果。然而,从序列中间的分辨率值不在最后回调的范围内,我如何访问它们?

function getExample() {
    return promiseA(…).then(function(resultA) {
        // Some processing
        return promiseB(…);
    }).then(function(resultB) {
        // More processing
        return // How do I gain access to resultA here?
    });
}

当前回答

ECMAScript和谐

当然,语言设计者也认识到了这个问题。他们做了大量的工作,异步函数提案最终得以通过

ECMAScript 8

您不再需要单个then调用或回调函数,就像在异步函数(在被调用时返回promise)中一样,您可以简单地等待promise直接解析。它还具有任意的控制结构,如条件,循环和try-catch子句,但为了方便起见,我们在这里不需要它们:

async function getExample() {
    var resultA = await promiseA(…);
    // some processing
    var resultB = await promiseB(…);
    // more processing
    return // something using both resultA and resultB
}

ECMAScript 6

当我们在等待ES8时,我们已经使用了非常类似的语法。ES6附带了生成器函数,允许在任意放置的yield关键字处将执行分开。这些切片可以彼此独立地、甚至异步地运行——当我们想要在运行下一步之前等待承诺解决时,我们就是这样做的。

有专门的库(如co或task.js),但也有许多承诺库有辅助函数(Q, Bluebird, when,…),当你给它们一个生成承诺的生成器函数时,它们会为你执行异步逐步执行。

var getExample = Promise.coroutine(function* () {
//               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Bluebird syntax
    var resultA = yield promiseA(…);
    // some processing
    var resultB = yield promiseB(…);
    // more processing
    return // something using both resultA and resultB
});

这在Node.js 4.0版本起就可以了,也有一些浏览器(或他们的开发版本)相对较早地支持生成器语法。

ECMAScript 5

然而,如果你想要/需要向后兼容,你就不能在没有转译器的情况下使用它们。当前工具支持生成器函数和异步函数,例如,请参阅关于生成器和异步函数的Babel文档。

此外,还有许多其他的编译到js语言 它们致力于简化异步编程。它们通常使用类似于await的语法(例如Iced CoffeeScript),但也有其他一些具有类似haskell的do-notation(例如LatteJs, monadic, PureScript或LispyScript)。

其他回答

对“可变上下文状态”不那么苛刻的解释

对于您提出的问题,使用局部作用域对象来收集承诺链中的中间结果是一种合理的方法。考虑下面的代码片段:

function getExample(){
    //locally scoped
    const results = {};
    return promiseA(paramsA).then(function(resultA){
        results.a = resultA;
        return promiseB(paramsB);
    }).then(function(resultB){
        results.b = resultB;
        return promiseC(paramsC);
    }).then(function(resultC){
        //Resolve with composite of all promises
        return Promise.resolve(results.a + results.b + resultC);
    }).catch(function(error){
        return Promise.reject(error);
    });
}

Global variables are bad, so this solution uses a locally scoped variable which causes no harm. It is only accessible within the function. Mutable state is ugly, but this does not mutate state in an ugly manner. The ugly mutable state traditionally refers to modifying the state of function arguments or global variables, but this approach simply modifies the state of a locally scoped variable that exists for the sole purpose of aggregating promise results...a variable that will die a simple death once the promise resolves. Intermediate promises are not prevented from accessing the state of the results object, but this does not introduce some scary scenario where one of the promises in the chain will go rogue and sabotage your results. The responsibility of setting the values in each step of the promise is confined to this function and the overall result will either be correct or incorrect...it will not be some bug that will crop up years later in production (unless you intend it to!) This does not introduce a race condition scenario that would arise from parallel invocation because a new instance of the results variable is created for every invocation of the getExample function.

示例在jsfiddle上可用

关于承诺,我学到的是只将其用作返回值,尽可能避免引用它们。Async /await语法对此特别实用。今天所有最新的浏览器和节点都支持它:https://caniuse.com/#feat=async-functions,是一个简单的行为,代码就像读取同步代码,忘记回调…

在我确实需要引用承诺的情况下,创建和解决发生在独立/不相关的地方。因此,我宁愿使用人工关联和事件侦听器来解析“远程”承诺,而更喜欢将承诺公开为Deferred,下面的代码在有效的es5中实现了它

/**
 * Promise like object that allows to resolve it promise from outside code. Example:
 *
```
class Api {
  fooReady = new Deferred<Data>()
  private knower() {
    inOtherMoment(data=>{
      this.fooReady.resolve(data)
    })
  }
}
```
 */
var Deferred = /** @class */ (function () {
  function Deferred(callback) {
    var instance = this;
    this.resolve = null;
    this.reject = null;
    this.status = 'pending';
    this.promise = new Promise(function (resolve, reject) {
      instance.resolve = function () { this.status = 'resolved'; resolve.apply(this, arguments); };
      instance.reject = function () { this.status = 'rejected'; reject.apply(this, arguments); };
    });
    if (typeof callback === 'function') {
      callback.call(this, this.resolve, this.reject);
    }
  }
  Deferred.prototype.then = function (resolve) {
    return this.promise.then(resolve);
  };
  Deferred.prototype.catch = function (r) {
    return this.promise.catch(r);
  };
  return Deferred;
}());

编译自我的一个typescript项目:

https://github.com/cancerberoSgx/misc-utils-of-mine/blob/2927c2477839f7b36247d054e7e50abe8a41358b/misc-utils-of-mine-generic/src/promise.ts#L31

对于更复杂的情况,我经常使用这些没有测试和输入依赖关系的小工具。P-map已经有用过几次了。我认为他涵盖了大多数用例:

https://github.com/sindresorhus?utf8=%E2%9C%93&tab=repositories&q=promise&type=source&language=

我认为你可以使用RSVP哈希。

内容如下:

    const mainPromise = () => {
        const promise1 = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            setTimeout(() => {
                console.log('first promise is completed');
                resolve({data: '123'});
            }, 2000);
        });

        const promise2 = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            setTimeout(() => {
                console.log('second promise is completed');
                resolve({data: '456'});
            }, 2000);
        });

        return new RSVP.hash({
              prom1: promise1,
              prom2: promise2
          });

    };


   mainPromise()
    .then(data => {
        console.log(data.prom1);
        console.log(data.prom2);
    });

这几天,我也遇到了一些像你一样的问题。最后,我用这个问题找到了一个很好的解决方案,它简单易懂。我希望这能帮助到你。

根据how-to-chain-javascript-promises

好的,让我们看看代码:

const firstPromise = () => {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => {
            console.log('first promise is completed');
            resolve({data: '123'});
        }, 2000);
    });
};

const secondPromise = (someStuff) => {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => {
            console.log('second promise is completed');
            resolve({newData: `${someStuff.data} some more data`});
        }, 2000);
    });
};

const thirdPromise = (someStuff) => {
    return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
        setTimeout(() => {
            console.log('third promise is completed');
            resolve({result: someStuff});
        }, 2000);
    });
};

firstPromise()
    .then(secondPromise)
    .then(thirdPromise)
    .then(data => {
        console.log(data);
    });

解决方案:

你可以使用'bind'显式地将中间值放在任何后来的'then'函数的作用域中。这是一个很好的解决方案,它不需要改变promise的工作方式,只需要一两行代码来传播这些值,就像已经传播错误一样。

下面是一个完整的例子:

// Get info asynchronously from a server
function pGetServerInfo()
    {
    // then value: "server info"
    } // pGetServerInfo

// Write into a file asynchronously
function pWriteFile(path,string)
    {
    // no then value
    } // pWriteFile

// The heart of the solution: Write formatted info into a log file asynchronously,
// using the pGetServerInfo and pWriteFile operations
function pLogInfo(localInfo)
    {
    var scope={localInfo:localInfo}; // Create an explicit scope object
    var thenFunc=p2.bind(scope); // Create a temporary function with this scope
    return (pGetServerInfo().then(thenFunc)); // Do the next 'then' in the chain
    } // pLogInfo

// Scope of this 'then' function is {localInfo:localInfo}
function p2(serverInfo)
    {
    // Do the final 'then' in the chain: Writes "local info, server info"
    return pWriteFile('log',this.localInfo+','+serverInfo);
    } // p2

该解决方案的调用方式如下:

pLogInfo("local info").then().catch(err);

(注意:这个解决方案的一个更复杂和完整的版本已经测试过了,但没有这个示例版本,所以它可能有一个bug。)