我喜欢@mar10的版本，尽管从我的角度来看，有误用的可能(如果版本与Semantic Versioning文档兼容，似乎不是这样，但如果使用了一些“构建号”，则可能是这样):

versionCompare( '1.09', '1.1');  // returns 1, which is wrong:  1.09 < 1.1
versionCompare('1.702', '1.8');  // returns 1, which is wrong: 1.702 < 1.8

这里的问题是，在某些情况下，版本号的子数字被删除了后面的零(至少我最近在使用不同的软件时看到的)，这类似于数字的有理数部分，因此:

5.17.2054 > 5.17.2
5.17.2 == 5.17.20 == 5.17.200 == ... 
5.17.2054 > 5.17.20
5.17.2054 > 5.17.200
5.17.2054 > 5.17.2000
5.17.2054 > 5.17.20000
5.17.2054 < 5.17.20001
5.17.2054 < 5.17.3
5.17.2054 < 5.17.30

但是，第一个(或第一个和第二个)版本子号始终被视为它实际等于的整数值。

如果你使用这种版本控制，你可以只改变例子中的几行:

// replace this:
p1 = parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);
p2 = parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);
// with this:
p1 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v1parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);
p2 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v2parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);

因此，除了第一个子数字外，每个子数字都将作为浮点数进行比较，因此09和1将相应地变成0.09和0.1，并以这种方式进行正确比较。2054和3将变成0.2054和0.3。

那么，完整的版本是(归功于@mar10):

/** Compare two dotted version strings (like '10.2.3').
 * @returns {Integer} 0: v1 == v2, -1: v1 < v2, 1: v1 > v2
 */
function versionCompare(v1, v2) {
    var v1parts = ("" + v1).split("."),
        v2parts = ("" + v2).split("."),
        minLength = Math.min(v1parts.length, v2parts.length),
        p1, p2, i;
    // Compare tuple pair-by-pair. 
    for(i = 0; i < minLength; i++) {
        // Convert to integer if possible, because "8" > "10".
        p1 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v1parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);;
        p2 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v2parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);
        if (isNaN(p1)){ p1 = v1parts[i]; } 
        if (isNaN(p2)){ p2 = v2parts[i]; } 
        if (p1 == p2) {
            continue;
        }else if (p1 > p2) {
            return 1;
        }else if (p1 < p2) {
            return -1;
        }
        // one operand is NaN
        return NaN;
    }
    // The longer tuple is always considered 'greater'
    if (v1parts.length === v2parts.length) {
        return 0;
    }
    return (v1parts.length < v2parts.length) ? -1 : 1;
}

注:这是比较慢的，但也可以考虑重用相同的比较函数来操作字符串实际上是字符数组的事实:

 function cmp_ver(arr1, arr2) {
     // fill the tail of the array with smaller length with zeroes, to make both array have the same length
     while (min_arr.length < max_arr.length) {
         min_arr[min_arr.lentgh] = '0';
     }
     // compare every element in arr1 with corresponding element from arr2, 
     // but pass them into the same function, so string '2054' will act as
     // ['2','0','5','4'] and string '19', in this case, will become ['1', '9', '0', '0']
     for (i: 0 -> max_length) {
         var res = cmp_ver(arr1[i], arr2[i]);
         if (res !== 0) return res;
     }
 }

这是另一种递归算法。

这段代码只使用了Array。shift和递归，这意味着它可以在Internet Explorer 6+中运行。如果你有任何疑问，你可以访问我的GitHub页面。

(function(root, factory) {
  if (typeof exports === 'object') {
    return module.exports = factory();
  } else if (typeof define === 'function' && define.amd) {
    return define(factory);
  } else {
    return root.compareVer = factory();
  }
})(this, function() {
  'use strict';
  var _compareVer;
  _compareVer = function(newVer, oldVer) {
    var VER_RE, compareNum, isTrue, maxLen, newArr, newLen, newMatch, oldArr, oldLen, oldMatch, zerofill;
    VER_RE = /(\d+\.){1,9}\d+/;
    if (arguments.length !== 2) {
      return -100;
    }
    if (typeof newVer !== 'string') {
      return -2;
    }
    if (typeof oldVer !== 'string') {
      return -3;
    }
    newMatch = newVer.match(VER_RE);
    if (!newMatch || newMatch[0] !== newVer) {
      return -4;
    }
    oldMatch = oldVer.match(VER_RE);
    if (!oldMatch || oldMatch[0] !== oldVer) {
      return -5;
    }
    newVer = newVer.replace(/^0/, '');
    oldVer = oldVer.replace(/^0/, '');
    if (newVer === oldVer) {
      return 0;
    } else {
      newArr = newVer.split('.');
      oldArr = oldVer.split('.');
      newLen = newArr.length;
      oldLen = oldArr.length;
      maxLen = Math.max(newLen, oldLen);
      zerofill = function() {
        newArr.length < maxLen && newArr.push('0');
        oldArr.length < maxLen && oldArr.push('0');
        return newArr.length !== oldArr.length && zerofill();
      };
      newLen !== oldLen && zerofill();
      if (newArr.toString() === oldArr.toString()) {
        if (newLen > oldLen) {
          return 1;
        } else {
          return -1;
        }
      } else {
        isTrue = -1;
        compareNum = function() {
          var _new, _old;
          _new = ~~newArr.shift();
          _old = ~~oldArr.shift();
          _new > _old && (isTrue = 1);
          return _new === _old && newArr.length > 0 && compareNum();
        };
        compareNum();
        return isTrue;
      }
    }
  };
  return _compareVer;
});

好吧，我希望这段代码能帮助到一些人。

下面是测试。

console.log(compareVer("0.0.2","0.0.1"));//1
console.log(compareVer("0.0.10","0.0.1")); //1
console.log(compareVer("0.0.10","0.0.2")); //1
console.log(compareVer("0.9.0","0.9")); //1
console.log(compareVer("0.10.0","0.9.0")); //1
console.log(compareVer("1.7", "1.07")); //1
console.log(compareVer("1.0.07", "1.0.007")); //1

console.log(compareVer("0.3","0.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("0.0.3","0.0.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("0.0.3.0","0.0.3.0")); //0
console.log(compareVer("00.3","0.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("00.3","00.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("01.0.3","1.0.3")); //0
console.log(compareVer("1.0.3","01.0.3")); //0

console.log(compareVer("0.2.0","1.0.0")); //-1
console.log(compareVer('0.0.2.2.0',"0.0.2.3")); //-1
console.log(compareVer('0.0.2.0',"0.0.2")); //-1
console.log(compareVer('0.0.2',"0.0.2.0")); //-1
console.log(compareVer("1.07", "1.7")); //-1
console.log(compareVer("1.0.007", "1.0.07")); //-1

console.log(compareVer()); //-100
console.log(compareVer("0.0.2")); //-100
console.log(compareVer("0.0.2","0.0.2","0.0.2")); //-100
console.log(compareVer(1212,"0.0.2")); //-2
console.log(compareVer("0.0.2",1212)); //-3
console.log(compareVer('1.abc.2',"1.0.2")); //-4
console.log(compareVer('1.0.2',"1.abc.2")); //-5

2017答:

v1 = '20.0.12'; 
v2 = '3.123.12';

compareVersions(v1,v2) 
// return positive: v1 > v2, zero:v1 == v2, negative: v1 < v2 
function compareVersions(v1, v2) {
        v1= v1.split('.')
        v2= v2.split('.')
        var len = Math.max(v1.length,v2.length)
        /*default is true*/
        for( let i=0; i < len; i++)
            v1 = Number(v1[i] || 0);
            v2 = Number(v2[i] || 0);
            if (v1 !== v2) return v1 - v2 ;
            i++;
        }
        return 0;
    }

最简单的现代浏览器代码:

 function compareVersion2(ver1, ver2) {
      ver1 = ver1.split('.').map( s => s.padStart(10) ).join('.');
      ver2 = ver2.split('.').map( s => s.padStart(10) ).join('.');
      return ver1 <= ver2;
 }

这里的想法是比较数字，但以字符串的形式。为了使比较工作，两个字符串必须在相同的长度。所以:

"123" > "99"变成"123" > "099" 填充短数字“修复”比较

这里我用0填充每个部分，长度为10。然后使用简单的字符串比较来得到答案

例子:

var ver1 = '0.2.10', ver2=`0.10.2`
//become 
ver1 = '0000000000.0000000002.0000000010'
ver2 = '0000000000.0000000010.0000000002'
// then it easy to see that
ver1 <= ver2 // true

你可以遍历每个以句点分隔的字符并将其转换为int类型:

var parts = versionString.split('.');

for (var i = 0; i < parts.length; i++) {
  var value = parseInt(parts[i]);
  // do stuffs here.. perhaps build a numeric version variable?
}

我找到了最简单的方法来比较它们，但我不确定这是否是你想要的。

当我在控制台中运行下面的代码时，它是有意义的，并且使用sort()方法，我可以获得版本字符串的排序数组。它是根据字母顺序排列的。

"1.0" < "1.0.1" //true
var arr = ["1.0.1", "1.0", "3.2.0", "1.3"]
arr.sort();     //["1.0", "1.0.1", "1.3", "3.2.0"]

我必须比较我的扩展版本，但我没有 在这里找到一个可行的解决方案。在比较1.89 > 1.9或1.24.1 == 1.240.1时，几乎所有提议的期权都被打破了

这里，我从仅在最后的记录1.1 == 1.10和1.10.1 > 1.1.1中0下降的事实开始

compare_version = (new_version, old_version) => {
    new_version = new_version.split('.');
    old_version = old_version.split('.');
    for(let i = 0, m = Math.max(new_version.length, old_version.length); i<m; i++){
        //compare text
        let new_part = (i<m-1?'':'.') + (new_version[i] || 0)
        ,   old_part = (i<m-1?'':'.') + (old_version[i] || 0);
        //compare number (I don’t know what better)
      //let new_part = +((i<m-1?0:'.') + new_version[i]) || 0
      //,   old_part = +((i<m-1?0:'.') + old_version[i]) || 0;
        //console.log(new_part, old_part);
        if(old_part > new_part)return 0;    //change to -1 for sort the array
        if(new_part > old_part)return 1
    }
    return 0
};
compare_version('1.0.240.1','1.0.240.1');   //0
compare_version('1.0.24.1','1.0.240.1');    //0
compare_version('1.0.240.89','1.0.240.9');  //0
compare_version('1.0.24.1','1.0.24');       //1

我不是一个大专家，但我构建了简单的代码来比较两个版本，将第一个返回值更改为-1以对版本数组进行排序

['1.0.240', '1.0.24', '1.0.240.9', '1.0.240.89'].sort(compare_version)
//results ["1.0.24", "1.0.240", "1.0.240.89", "1.0.240.9"]

和短版本的比较全字符串

c=e=>e.split('.').map((e,i,a)=>e[i<a.length-1?'padStart':'padEnd'](5)).join('');

//results "    1    0  2409    " > "    1    0  24089   "

c('1.0.240.9')>c('1.0.240.89')              //true

如果您有意见或改进，请不要犹豫提出建议。