以下是软件版本号:

"1.0", "1.0.1", "2.0", "2.0.0.1", "2.0.1"

我怎么比较呢?

假设正确的顺序是:

"1.0", "1.0.1", "2.0", "2.0.0.1", "2.0.1"

想法很简单… 读第一个数字,然后,第二个,第三个… 但是我不能将版本号转换为浮点数… 你也可以像这样看到版本号:

"1.0.0.0", "1.0.1.0", "2.0.0.0", "2.0.0.1", "2.0.1.0"

这样可以更清楚地看到背后的想法。 但是,我怎样才能把它转换成计算机程序呢?


当前回答

我喜欢@mar10的版本,尽管从我的角度来看,有误用的可能(如果版本与Semantic Versioning文档兼容,似乎不是这样,但如果使用了一些“构建号”,则可能是这样):

versionCompare( '1.09', '1.1');  // returns 1, which is wrong:  1.09 < 1.1
versionCompare('1.702', '1.8');  // returns 1, which is wrong: 1.702 < 1.8

这里的问题是,在某些情况下,版本号的子数字被删除了后面的零(至少我最近在使用不同的软件时看到的),这类似于数字的有理数部分,因此:

5.17.2054 > 5.17.2
5.17.2 == 5.17.20 == 5.17.200 == ... 
5.17.2054 > 5.17.20
5.17.2054 > 5.17.200
5.17.2054 > 5.17.2000
5.17.2054 > 5.17.20000
5.17.2054 < 5.17.20001
5.17.2054 < 5.17.3
5.17.2054 < 5.17.30

但是,第一个(或第一个和第二个)版本子号始终被视为它实际等于的整数值。

如果你使用这种版本控制,你可以只改变例子中的几行:

// replace this:
p1 = parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);
p2 = parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);
// with this:
p1 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v1parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);
p2 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v2parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);

因此,除了第一个子数字外,每个子数字都将作为浮点数进行比较,因此09和1将相应地变成0.09和0.1,并以这种方式进行正确比较。2054和3将变成0.2054和0.3。

那么,完整的版本是(归功于@mar10):

/** Compare two dotted version strings (like '10.2.3').
 * @returns {Integer} 0: v1 == v2, -1: v1 < v2, 1: v1 > v2
 */
function versionCompare(v1, v2) {
    var v1parts = ("" + v1).split("."),
        v2parts = ("" + v2).split("."),
        minLength = Math.min(v1parts.length, v2parts.length),
        p1, p2, i;
    // Compare tuple pair-by-pair. 
    for(i = 0; i < minLength; i++) {
        // Convert to integer if possible, because "8" > "10".
        p1 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v1parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);;
        p2 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v2parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);
        if (isNaN(p1)){ p1 = v1parts[i]; } 
        if (isNaN(p2)){ p2 = v2parts[i]; } 
        if (p1 == p2) {
            continue;
        }else if (p1 > p2) {
            return 1;
        }else if (p1 < p2) {
            return -1;
        }
        // one operand is NaN
        return NaN;
    }
    // The longer tuple is always considered 'greater'
    if (v1parts.length === v2parts.length) {
        return 0;
    }
    return (v1parts.length < v2parts.length) ? -1 : 1;
}

注:这是比较慢的,但也可以考虑重用相同的比较函数来操作字符串实际上是字符数组的事实:

 function cmp_ver(arr1, arr2) {
     // fill the tail of the array with smaller length with zeroes, to make both array have the same length
     while (min_arr.length < max_arr.length) {
         min_arr[min_arr.lentgh] = '0';
     }
     // compare every element in arr1 with corresponding element from arr2, 
     // but pass them into the same function, so string '2054' will act as
     // ['2','0','5','4'] and string '19', in this case, will become ['1', '9', '0', '0']
     for (i: 0 -> max_length) {
         var res = cmp_ver(arr1[i], arr2[i]);
         if (res !== 0) return res;
     }
 }

其他回答

如果两个版本相等,函数将返回-1,如果第一个版本是最新版本,则返回0,而1表示第二个版本是最新版本。

let v1 = '12.0.1.0'
let v2 = '12.0.1'

let temp1 = v1.split('.');
let temp2 = v2.split('.');

console.log(compareVersion(temp1, temp2))


function compareVersion(version1, version2) {
    let flag = false;
    var compareResult;
    let maxLength = Math.max(version1.length, version2.length); 
    let minLength = Math.min(version1.length, version2.length);

    for (let i = 0; i < maxLength; ++i ) {
        let result = version1[i] - version2[i];
        if (result > 0) {
            flag = true;
            compareResult = 0;
            break;
        }
        else if (result < 0) {
            flag = true;
            compareResult = 1;
            break;
        }

        if (i === minLength) {
            if (version1.length > version1.length) {
                compareResult = version1[version1.length-1] > 0 ? '0' : '-1'
            }  else  {
                compareResult = version1[version2.length-1] > 0 ? '1' : '-1'
            }
            break;
        }
    }
    if (flag === false) {
        compareResult = -1;
    }
    return compareResult;
}
// Returns true if v1 is bigger than v2, and false if otherwise.
function isNewerThan(v1, v2) {
      v1=v1.split('.');
      v2=v2.split('.');
      for(var i = 0; i<Math.max(v1.length,v2.length); i++){
        if(v1[i] == undefined) return false; // If there is no digit, v2 is automatically bigger
        if(v2[i] == undefined) return true; // if there is no digit, v1 is automatically bigger
        if(v1[i] > v2[i]) return true;
        if(v1[i] < v2[i]) return false;
      }
      return false; // Returns false if they are equal
    }

2020年(大多数时候)正确的JavaScript答案

Nina Scholz在2020年3月和Sid Vishnoi在2020年4月都给出了现代的答案:

var versions = ["2.0.1", "2.0", "1.0", "1.0.1", "2.0.0.1"];

versions.sort((a, b) => 
   a.localeCompare(b, undefined, { numeric: true, sensitivity: 'base' })
);

console.log(versions);

localCompare已经存在一段时间了

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Intl/Collator/Collator

但是1.0a和1.0.1呢

localCompare不能解决这个问题,仍然返回1.0.1,1.0a

迈克尔·迪尔(Michael Deal)在他的(略长且复杂的)解决方案中已经在2013年解决了这个问题

他将数字转换为另一种进位,以便更好地排序

他的回答让我思考……

666 -不要用数字思考- 999

排序是基于ASCII值的字母数字排序,所以让我们(ab)使用ASCII作为“基”

我的解决方案是将1.0.2.1到b.a.c.b转换为bacb,然后排序

这解决了1.1 vs. 1.0.0.0.1: bb vs. baaab

立即用baa和bab符号解决了1.0a和1.0.1排序问题

转换是通过:

    const str = s => s.match(/(\d+)|[a-z]/g)
                      .map(c => c == ~~c ? String.fromCharCode(97 + c) : c);

=计算ASCII值0…999数字,否则连字母

1.0 > > >(“0”,“1”” " ] >>> [ " b”、“”、“”)

为了便于比较,没有必要使用.join("")将其连接到一个字符串。

Oneliner

const sortVersions=(x,v=s=>s.match(/(\d+)|[a-z]/g)
                            .map(c=>c==~~c?String.fromCharCode(97+c):c))
                    =>x.sort((a,b)=>v(b)<v(a)?1:-1)

测试代码片段:

function log(label,val){ document.body.append(label,String(val).replace(/,/g," - "),document.createElement("BR")); } let v = ["1.90.1", "1.9.1", "1.89", "1.090", "1.2", "1.0a", "1.0.1", "1.10", "1.0.0a"]; log('not sorted input :',v); v.sort((a, b) => a.localeCompare(b,undefined,{numeric:true,sensitivity:'base' })); log(' locale Compare :', v); // 1.0a AFTER 1.0.1 const str = s => s.match(/(\d+)|[a-z]/g) .map(c => c == ~~c ? String.fromCharCode(97 + c) : c); const versionCompare = (a, b) => { a = str(a); b = str(b); return b < a ? 1 : a == b ? 0 : -1; } v.sort(versionCompare); log('versionCompare:', v);

注意1.090是如何在两个结果中排序的。

我的代码不会解决一个答案中提到的001.012.001符号,但是localeCompare正确地解决了这部分挑战。

你可以结合这两种方法:

当涉及字母时,使用.localCompare或versionCompare进行排序

最终的JavaScript解决方案

const sortVersions = ( x, V = s => s.match(/[a-z]|\d+/g)。Map (c => c==~~c ?String.fromCharCode(97 + c): c) => x.sort((a, b) => (a + b).match(/[a-z]/) ? V (b) < V (a) ?1: -1 : a.localeCompare(b, 0, {numeric: true})) 让v =[" 1.90.1”、“1.090”、“1.0”、“1.0.1”,“1.0.0a”,“1.0.0b”、“1.0.0.1”); console.log (sortVersions (v));

我不喜欢任何一个解决方案,所以我根据自己的编码偏好重新编写了它。请注意,最后四个检查结果与接受的答案略有不同。对我有用。

function v_check(version_a, version_b) {
    // compares version_a as it relates to version_b
    // a = b => "same"
    // a > b => "larger"
    // a < b => "smaller"
    // NaN   => "invalid"

    const arr_a = version_a.split('.');
    const arr_b = version_b.split('.');

    let result = "same"; // initialize to same // loop tries to disprove

    // loop through a and check each number against the same position in b
    for (let i = 0; i < arr_a.length; i++) {
        let a = arr_a[i];
        let b = arr_b[i];

        // same up to this point so if a is not there, a is smaller
        if (typeof a === 'undefined') {
            result = "smaller";
            break;

        // same up to this point so if b is not there, a is larger
        } else if (typeof b === 'undefined') {
            result = "larger";
            break;

        // otherwise, compare the two numbers
        } else {

            // non-positive numbers are invalid
            if (a >= 0 && b >= 0) {

                if (a < b) {
                    result = "smaller";
                    break;
                }
                else if (a > b) {
                    result = "larger";
                    break;
                }

            } else {
                result = "invalid";
                break;
            }
        }
    }

    // account for the case where the loop ended but there was still a position in b to evaluate
    if (result == "same" && arr_b.length > arr_a.length) result = "smaller";

    return result;
}


console.log(v_check("1.7.1", "1.7.10"));  // smaller
console.log(v_check("1.6.1", "1.7.10"));  // smaller
console.log(v_check("1.6.20", "1.7.10")); // smaller
console.log(v_check("1.7.1", "1.7.10"));  // smaller
console.log(v_check("1.7", "1.7.0"));     // smaller
console.log(v_check("1.7", "1.8.0"));     // smaller

console.log(v_check("1.7.10", "1.7.1"));  // larger
console.log(v_check("1.7.10", "1.6.1"));  // larger
console.log(v_check("1.7.10", "1.6.20")); // larger
console.log(v_check("1.7.0", "1.7"));     // larger
console.log(v_check("1.8.0", "1.7"));     // larger

console.log(v_check("1.7.10", "1.7.10")); // same
console.log(v_check("1.7", "1.7"));       // same

console.log(v_check("1.7", "1..7")); // larger
console.log(v_check("1.7", "Bad"));  // invalid
console.log(v_check("1..7", "1.7")); // smaller
console.log(v_check("Bad", "1.7"));  // invalid

看看这篇博客文章。此函数适用于数字版本号。

function compVersions(strV1, strV2) {
  var nRes = 0
    , parts1 = strV1.split('.')
    , parts2 = strV2.split('.')
    , nLen = Math.max(parts1.length, parts2.length);

  for (var i = 0; i < nLen; i++) {
    var nP1 = (i < parts1.length) ? parseInt(parts1[i], 10) : 0
      , nP2 = (i < parts2.length) ? parseInt(parts2[i], 10) : 0;

    if (isNaN(nP1)) { nP1 = 0; }
    if (isNaN(nP2)) { nP2 = 0; }

    if (nP1 != nP2) {
      nRes = (nP1 > nP2) ? 1 : -1;
      break;
    }
  }

  return nRes;
};

compVersions('10', '10.0'); // 0
compVersions('10.1', '10.01.0'); // 0
compVersions('10.0.1', '10.0'); // 1
compVersions('10.0.1', '10.1'); // -1