看看这篇博客文章。此函数适用于数字版本号。

function compVersions(strV1, strV2) {
  var nRes = 0
    , parts1 = strV1.split('.')
    , parts2 = strV2.split('.')
    , nLen = Math.max(parts1.length, parts2.length);

  for (var i = 0; i < nLen; i++) {
    var nP1 = (i < parts1.length) ? parseInt(parts1[i], 10) : 0
      , nP2 = (i < parts2.length) ? parseInt(parts2[i], 10) : 0;

    if (isNaN(nP1)) { nP1 = 0; }
    if (isNaN(nP2)) { nP2 = 0; }

    if (nP1 != nP2) {
      nRes = (nP1 > nP2) ? 1 : -1;
      break;
    }
  }

  return nRes;
};

compVersions('10', '10.0'); // 0
compVersions('10.1', '10.01.0'); // 0
compVersions('10.0.1', '10.0'); // 1
compVersions('10.0.1', '10.1'); // -1

我喜欢@mar10的版本，尽管从我的角度来看，有误用的可能(如果版本与Semantic Versioning文档兼容，似乎不是这样，但如果使用了一些“构建号”，则可能是这样):

versionCompare( '1.09', '1.1');  // returns 1, which is wrong:  1.09 < 1.1
versionCompare('1.702', '1.8');  // returns 1, which is wrong: 1.702 < 1.8

这里的问题是，在某些情况下，版本号的子数字被删除了后面的零(至少我最近在使用不同的软件时看到的)，这类似于数字的有理数部分，因此:

5.17.2054 > 5.17.2
5.17.2 == 5.17.20 == 5.17.200 == ... 
5.17.2054 > 5.17.20
5.17.2054 > 5.17.200
5.17.2054 > 5.17.2000
5.17.2054 > 5.17.20000
5.17.2054 < 5.17.20001
5.17.2054 < 5.17.3
5.17.2054 < 5.17.30

但是，第一个(或第一个和第二个)版本子号始终被视为它实际等于的整数值。

如果你使用这种版本控制，你可以只改变例子中的几行:

// replace this:
p1 = parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);
p2 = parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);
// with this:
p1 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v1parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);
p2 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v2parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);

因此，除了第一个子数字外，每个子数字都将作为浮点数进行比较，因此09和1将相应地变成0.09和0.1，并以这种方式进行正确比较。2054和3将变成0.2054和0.3。

那么，完整的版本是(归功于@mar10):

/** Compare two dotted version strings (like '10.2.3').
 * @returns {Integer} 0: v1 == v2, -1: v1 < v2, 1: v1 > v2
 */
function versionCompare(v1, v2) {
    var v1parts = ("" + v1).split("."),
        v2parts = ("" + v2).split("."),
        minLength = Math.min(v1parts.length, v2parts.length),
        p1, p2, i;
    // Compare tuple pair-by-pair. 
    for(i = 0; i < minLength; i++) {
        // Convert to integer if possible, because "8" > "10".
        p1 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v1parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v1parts[i], 10);;
        p2 = i/* > 0 */ ? parseFloat('0.' + v2parts[i], 10) : parseInt(v2parts[i], 10);
        if (isNaN(p1)){ p1 = v1parts[i]; } 
        if (isNaN(p2)){ p2 = v2parts[i]; } 
        if (p1 == p2) {
            continue;
        }else if (p1 > p2) {
            return 1;
        }else if (p1 < p2) {
            return -1;
        }
        // one operand is NaN
        return NaN;
    }
    // The longer tuple is always considered 'greater'
    if (v1parts.length === v2parts.length) {
        return 0;
    }
    return (v1parts.length < v2parts.length) ? -1 : 1;
}

注:这是比较慢的，但也可以考虑重用相同的比较函数来操作字符串实际上是字符数组的事实:

 function cmp_ver(arr1, arr2) {
     // fill the tail of the array with smaller length with zeroes, to make both array have the same length
     while (min_arr.length < max_arr.length) {
         min_arr[min_arr.lentgh] = '0';
     }
     // compare every element in arr1 with corresponding element from arr2, 
     // but pass them into the same function, so string '2054' will act as
     // ['2','0','5','4'] and string '19', in this case, will become ['1', '9', '0', '0']
     for (i: 0 -> max_length) {
         var res = cmp_ver(arr1[i], arr2[i]);
         if (res !== 0) return res;
     }
 }

比较不同条件下的功能:

const compareVer = (ver1, middle, ver2) => {
  const res = new Intl.Collator("en").compare(ver1, ver2)
  let comp

  switch (middle) {
    case "=":
      comp = 0 === res
      break

    case ">":
      comp = 1 === res
      break

    case ">=":
      comp = 1 === res || 0 === res
      break

    case "<":
      comp = -1 === res
      break

    case "<=":
      comp = -1 === res || 0 === res
      break
  }

  return comp
}

console.log(compareVer("1.0.2", "=", "1.0.2")) // true
console.log(compareVer("1.0.3", ">", "1.0.2")) // true
console.log(compareVer("1.0.1", ">=", "1.0.2")) // false
console.log(compareVer("1.0.3", ">=", "1.0.2")) // true
console.log(compareVer("1.0.1", "<", "1.0.2")) // true
console.log(compareVer("1.0.1", "<=", "1.0.2")) // true

这是一个巧妙的技巧。如果您正在处理数值，在特定的值范围内，您可以为版本对象的每个级别分配一个值。例如，“largestValue”在这里被设置为0xFF，这为您的版本控制创建了一个非常“IP”的外观。

这也处理字母-数字版本(即1.2a < 1.2b)

// The version compare function
function compareVersion(data0, data1, levels) {
    function getVersionHash(version) {
        var value = 0;
        version = version.split(".").map(function (a) {
            var n = parseInt(a);
            var letter = a.replace(n, "");
            if (letter) {
                return n + letter[0].charCodeAt() / 0xFF;
            } else {
                return n;
            }
        });
        for (var i = 0; i < version.length; ++i) {
            if (levels === i) break;
            value += version[i] / 0xFF * Math.pow(0xFF, levels - i + 1);
        }
        return value;
    };
    var v1 = getVersionHash(data0);
    var v2 = getVersionHash(data1);
    return v1 === v2 ? -1 : v1 > v2 ? 0 : 1;
};
// Returns 0 or 1, correlating to input A and input B
// Direct match returns -1
var version = compareVersion("1.254.253", "1.254.253a", 3);

一个非常简单的方法:

function compareVer(previousVersion, currentVersion) {
 try {
    const [prevMajor, prevMinor = 0, prevPatch = 0] = previousVersion.split('.').map(Number);
    const [curMajor, curMinor = 0, curPatch = 0] = currentVersion.split('.').map(Number);

    if (curMajor > prevMajor) {
      return 'major update';
    }
    if (curMajor < prevMajor) {
      return 'major downgrade';
    }
    if (curMinor > prevMinor) {
      return 'minor update';
    }
    if (curMinor < prevMinor) {
      return 'minor downgrade';
    }
    if (curPatch > prevPatch) {
      return 'patch update';
    }
    if (curPatch < prevPatch) {
      return 'patch downgrade';
    }
    return 'same version';
  } catch (e) {
    return 'invalid format';
  }
}

输出:

compareVer("3.1", "3.1.1") // patch update
compareVer("3.1.1", "3.2") // minor update
compareVer("2.1.1", "1.1.1") // major downgrade
compareVer("1.1.1", "1.1.1") // same version

这里有一个面向对象的有趣方法:

    function versionString(str) {
    var parts = str.split('.');
    this.product = parts.length > 0 ? parts[0] * 1 : 0;
    this.major = parts.length > 1 ? parts[1] * 1 : 0;
    this.minor = parts.length > 2 ? parts[2] * 1 : 0;
    this.build = parts.length > 3 ? parts[3] * 1 : 0;

    this.compareTo = function(vStr){
        vStr = this._isVersionString(vStr) ? vStr : new versionString(vStr);
        return this.compare(this, vStr);
    };

    this.toString = function(){
        return this.product + "." + this.major + "." + this.minor + "." + this.build;
    }

    this.compare = function (str1, str2) {
        var vs1 = this._isVersionString(str1) ? str1 : new versionString(str1);
        var vs2 = this._isVersionString(str2) ? str2 : new versionString(str2);

        if (this._compareNumbers(vs1.product, vs2.product) == 0) {
            if (this._compareNumbers(vs1.major, vs2.major) == 0) {
                if (this._compareNumbers(vs1.minor, vs2.minor) == 0) {
                    return this._compareNumbers(vs1.build, vs2.build);
                } else {
                    return this._compareNumbers(vs1.minor, vs2.minor);
                }
            } else {
                return this._compareNumbers(vs1.major, vs2.major);
            }
        } else {
            return this._compareNumbers(vs1.product, vs2.product);
        }
    };

    this._isVersionString = function (str) {
        return str !== undefined && str.build !== undefined;
    };

    this._compareNumbers = function (n1, n2) {
        if (n1 > n2) {
            return 1;
        } else if (n1 < n2) {
            return -1;
        } else {
            return 0;
        }
    };
}

还有一些测试:

var v1 = new versionString("1.0");
var v2 = new versionString("1.0.1");
var v3 = new versionString("2.0");
var v4 = new versionString("2.0.0.1");
var v5 = new versionString("2.0.1");


alert(v1.compareTo("1.4.2"));
alert(v3.compareTo(v1));
alert(v5.compareTo(v4));
alert(v4.compareTo(v5));
alert(v5.compareTo(v5));