你可以使用带有选项的String#localeCompare

sensitivity Which differences in the strings should lead to non-zero result values. Possible values are: "base": Only strings that differ in base letters compare as unequal. Examples: a ≠ b, a = á, a = A. "accent": Only strings that differ in base letters or accents and other diacritic marks compare as unequal. Examples: a ≠ b, a ≠ á, a = A. "case": Only strings that differ in base letters or case compare as unequal. Examples: a ≠ b, a = á, a ≠ A. "variant": Strings that differ in base letters, accents and other diacritic marks, or case compare as unequal. Other differences may also be taken into consideration. Examples: a ≠ b, a ≠ á, a ≠ A. The default is "variant" for usage "sort"; it's locale dependent for usage "search". numeric Whether numeric collation should be used, such that "1" < "2" < "10". Possible values are true and false; the default is false. This option can be set through an options property or through a Unicode extension key; if both are provided, the options property takes precedence. Implementations are not required to support this property.

var版本=[" 2.0.1”、“2.0”、“1.0”、“1.0.1”,“2.0.0.1”); 版本。sort((a, b) => a.localeCompare(b, undefined， {numeric: true，灵敏度:'base'})); console.log(版本);

我必须比较我的扩展版本，但我没有 在这里找到一个可行的解决方案。在比较1.89 > 1.9或1.24.1 == 1.240.1时，几乎所有提议的期权都被打破了

这里，我从仅在最后的记录1.1 == 1.10和1.10.1 > 1.1.1中0下降的事实开始

compare_version = (new_version, old_version) => {
    new_version = new_version.split('.');
    old_version = old_version.split('.');
    for(let i = 0, m = Math.max(new_version.length, old_version.length); i<m; i++){
        //compare text
        let new_part = (i<m-1?'':'.') + (new_version[i] || 0)
        ,   old_part = (i<m-1?'':'.') + (old_version[i] || 0);
        //compare number (I don’t know what better)
      //let new_part = +((i<m-1?0:'.') + new_version[i]) || 0
      //,   old_part = +((i<m-1?0:'.') + old_version[i]) || 0;
        //console.log(new_part, old_part);
        if(old_part > new_part)return 0;    //change to -1 for sort the array
        if(new_part > old_part)return 1
    }
    return 0
};
compare_version('1.0.240.1','1.0.240.1');   //0
compare_version('1.0.24.1','1.0.240.1');    //0
compare_version('1.0.240.89','1.0.240.9');  //0
compare_version('1.0.24.1','1.0.24');       //1

我不是一个大专家，但我构建了简单的代码来比较两个版本，将第一个返回值更改为-1以对版本数组进行排序

['1.0.240', '1.0.24', '1.0.240.9', '1.0.240.89'].sort(compare_version)
//results ["1.0.24", "1.0.240", "1.0.240.89", "1.0.240.9"]

和短版本的比较全字符串

c=e=>e.split('.').map((e,i,a)=>e[i<a.length-1?'padStart':'padEnd'](5)).join('');

//results "    1    0  2409    " > "    1    0  24089   "

c('1.0.240.9')>c('1.0.240.89')              //true

如果您有意见或改进，请不要犹豫提出建议。

这个非常小，但非常快的比较函数接受每个段的任何长度和任何数字大小的版本号。

返回值: -如果a < b，则数字< 0 -如果是> b，则为> 0 如果a = b - 0

所以你可以使用它作为array。sort()的比较函数;

编辑:修正了版本剥离尾随零识别“1”和“1.0.0”相等的错误

function cmpVersions (a, b) { var i, diff; var regExStrip0 = /(\.0+)+$/; var segmentsA = a.replace(regExStrip0, '').split('.'); var segmentsB = b.replace(regExStrip0, '').split('.'); var l = Math.min(segmentsA.length, segmentsB.length); for (i = 0; i < l; i++) { diff = parseInt(segmentsA[i], 10) - parseInt(segmentsB[i], 10); if (diff) { return diff; } } return segmentsA.length - segmentsB.length; } // TEST console.log( ['2.5.10.4159', '1.0.0', '0.5', '0.4.1', '1', '1.1', '0.0.0', '2.5.0', '2', '0.0', '2.5.10', '10.5', '1.25.4', '1.2.15'].sort(cmpVersions)); // Result: // ["0.0.0", "0.0", "0.4.1", "0.5", "1.0.0", "1", "1.1", "1.2.15", "1.25.4", "2", "2.5.0", "2.5.10", "2.5.10.4159", "10.5"]

你不能把它们转换成数字，然后按大小排序吗?在长度< 4的数的1后面加上0

在主机上玩:

$(["1.0.0.0", "1.0.1.0", "2.0.0.0", "2.0.0.1", "2.0.1", "3.0"]).each(function(i,e) {
    var n =   e.replace(/\./g,"");
    while(n.length < 4) n+="0" ; 
    num.push(  +n  )
});

版本越大，数字越大。 编辑:可能需要调整，以考虑更大的版本系列

我写了一个排序版本的节点模块，你可以在这里找到它:version-sort

特点:

序列“1.0.1.5.53.54654.114.1.154.45”不受限制 不限制序列长度:'1.1546515465451654654654654138754431574364321353734'工作 可以根据版本对对象进行排序(参见README) 阶段(如alpha, beta, rc1, rc2)

如果您需要其他功能，请不要犹豫，打开一个问题。

你可以遍历每个以句点分隔的字符并将其转换为int类型:

var parts = versionString.split('.');

for (var i = 0; i < parts.length; i++) {
  var value = parseInt(parts[i]);
  // do stuffs here.. perhaps build a numeric version variable?
}