我目前正在开发一个产品(用c#开发的)，可以免费下载和安装，但版本非常有限。要获得所有功能，用户必须支付许可费并获得密钥。然后，该密钥将被输入应用程序以“解锁”完整版本。
像这样使用许可密钥是很常见的，我想知道:
这个问题通常是怎么解决的? 如何生成密钥以及应用程序如何验证密钥? 我怎样才能避免一个密钥被发布在互联网上，并被其他没有支付许可证的人使用(一个基本上不是“他们的”密钥)。
我想我还应该以某种方式将密钥绑定到应用程序的版本，这样就有可能在功能版本中对新密钥收费。
在这种情况下，还有什么需要考虑的吗?
当前回答
我不知道你想说得多详细
但我相信。net可以访问硬盘序列号。
你可以让程序把它和其他东西(比如网卡的用户名和MAC地址)发送给你
你在此基础上计算出一个代码，然后把密钥发邮件给他们。
他们会阻止他们在拿到钥匙后换机器。
其他回答
我以前用过Crypkey。这是许多可用的之一。
使用任何许可方案，您只能在一定程度上保护软件。
我通过将我的程序与一个不和谐的服务器连接来解决这个问题，它在一个特定的聊天中检查用户输入的产品密钥是否存在并且仍然有效。通过这种方式获得产品密钥，用户将被迫破解不和谐，这是非常困难的。
生成许可密钥的方法有很多，但真正安全的方法很少。这很遗憾，因为对于公司来说，许可证密钥的价值几乎与真正的现金相同。
理想情况下，您希望您的许可密钥具有以下属性:
Only your company should be able to generate license keys for your products, even if someone completely reverse engineers your products (which WILL happen, I speak from experience). Obfuscating the algorithm or hiding an encryption key within your software is really out of the question if you are serious about controlling licensing. If your product is successful, someone will make a key generator in a matter of days from release. A license key should be useable on only one computer (or at least you should be able to control this very tightly) A license key should be short and easy to type or dictate over the phone. You don't want every customer calling the technical support because they don't understand if the key contains a "l" or a "1". Your support department would thank you for this, and you will have lower costs in this area.
那么如何解决这些挑战呢?
The answer is simple but technically challenging: digital signatures using public key cryptography. Your license keys should be in fact signed "documents", containing some useful data, signed with your company's private key. The signatures should be part of the license key. The product should validate the license keys with the corresponding public key. This way, even if someone has full access to your product's logic, they cannot generate license keys because they don't have the private key. A license key would look like this: BASE32(CONCAT(DATA, PRIVATE_KEY_ENCRYPTED(HASH(DATA)))) The biggest challenge here is that the classical public key algorithms have large signature sizes. RSA512 has an 1024-bit signature. You don't want your license keys to have hundreds of characters. One of the most powerful approaches is to use elliptic curve cryptography (with careful implementations to avoid the existing patents). ECC keys are like 6 times shorter than RSA keys, for the same strength. You can further reduce the signature sizes using algorithms like the Schnorr digital signature algorithm (patent expired in 2008 - good :) ) This is achievable by product activation (Windows is a good example). Basically, for a customer with a valid license key, you need to generate some "activation data" which is a signed message embedding the computer's hardware id as the signed data. This is usually done over the internet, but only ONCE: the product sends the license key and the computer hardware id to an activation server, and the activation server sends back the signed message (which can also be made short and easy to dictate over the phone). From that moment on, the product does not check the license key at startup, but the activation data, which needs the computer to be the same in order to validate (otherwise, the DATA would be different and the digital signature would not validate). Note that the activation data checking do not require verification over the Internet: it is sufficient to verify the digital signature of the activation data with the public key already embedded in the product. Well, just eliminate redundant characters like "1", "l", "0", "o" from your keys. Split the license key string into groups of characters.
除了已经说过的....
由于中间语言的问题，. net应用程序的任何使用本质上都是容易被破坏的。对. net代码进行简单的反汇编就可以向任何人打开您的产品。他们可以很容易地绕过你的授权代码。
你甚至不能再使用硬件值来创建键了。虚拟机现在允许人们创建一个“许可”机器的映像，并在他们选择的任何平台上运行它。
如果软件价格昂贵，还有其他解决方案。如果不是，那就给普通黑客制造足够的难度。接受这个事实，即最终会有未授权的副本出现。
如果你的产品很复杂，固有的支持问题将为你创造一些保护。
在生成密钥时，不要忘记将版本和构建号连接到计算散列的字符串上。这样就不会有一把钥匙能打开你释放的所有东西。
当你在astalavista.box.sk中找到一些密钥或补丁后，你就会知道你成功地让某些东西变得流行，以至于有人费心去破解。喜乐!
